Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Stem Cells International
Volume 2018, Article ID 7906531, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7906531
Research Article

Comparison of Teratoma Formation between Embryonic Stem Cells and Parthenogenetic Embryonic Stem Cells by Molecular Imaging

1Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin 300071, China
2The Key Lab of Bioactive Materials, Ministry of Education, The College of Life Science, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
3Department of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology and Visual Science Key Lab of PLA, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
4State Key Laboratory of Kidney Diseases Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
5Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang 310058, China
6Department of Cardiology, Rizhao Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong 276800, China
7Beijing Engineering Laboratory of Perinatal Stem Cells, Beijing Institute of Health and Stem Cells, Health & Biotech Co., Beijing 100176, China
8State Key Lab of Experimental Hematology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300020, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Xiaojing Wang; nc.ca.smachi@gnijoaixgnaw and Zongjin Li; nc.ude.iaknan@ilnijgnoz

Received 7 November 2017; Accepted 27 December 2017; Published 25 March 2018

Academic Editor: Hui Li

Copyright © 2018 Hongyan Tao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

With their properties of self-renewal and differentiation, embryonic stem (ES) cells hold great promises for regenerative therapy. However, teratoma formation and ethical concerns of ES cells may restrict their potential clinical applications. Currently, parthenogenetic embryonic stem (pES) cells have attracted the interest of researchers for its self-renewing and pluripotent differentiation while eliciting less ethic concerns. In this study, we established a model with ES and pES cells both stably transfected with a double-fusion reporter gene containing renilla luciferase (Rluc) and red fluorescent protein (RFP) to analyze the mechanisms of teratoma formation. Transgenic Vegfr2-luc mouse, which expresses firefly luciferase (Fluc) under the promoter of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (Vegfr2-luc), was used to trace the growth of new blood vessel recruited by transplanted cells. Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) of Rluc/Fluc provides an effective tool in estimating the growth and angiogenesis of teratoma in vivo. We found that the tumorigenesis and angiogenesis capacity of ES cells were higher than those of pES cells, in which VEGF/VEGFR2 signal pathway plays an important role. In conclusion, pES cells have the decreased potential of teratoma formation but meanwhile have similar differentiating capacity compared with ES cells. These data demonstrate that pES cells provide an alternative source for ES cells with the risk reduction of teratoma formation and without ethical controversy.

1. Introduction

ES cells are unique among all stem cell populations owing to their high pluripotency and differentiation capacity, which makes them one of the most promising cells for regenerative medicine [1, 2]. Currently, successful differentiation methods of ES cells have been developed into multiple tissue types, including bladder [3], pancreas [4], liver [5], and female reproductive [6]. However, the possibility of teratoma formation after cell transplantation has restricted their applications in clinical [7]. More importantly, ethical concerns limit the isolation and application of human ES cell in clinical translation. Recently, parthenogenetic embryonic stem (pES) cells have attracted the interest of researchers for their pluripotent differentiation without ethical issues [8]. These cells can be derived from embryos resulted from artificial activation of oocytes without fertilization [9, 10]. The pES cell lines are similar to ES cells in terms of proliferation, expression of pluripotency markers, and capacity to differentiate into several cell lines including tenocyte-like cells [11], osteogenic cells [12], and neural cells [12].

Although the biological characterization of pES cells is well documented, available analysis about the biological behavior and teratoma formation mechanism of pES cells is limited. Thus, a detailed observation and functional analyses between pES cells and ES cells would gain insight into the teratoma formation of cells from different sources. To date, despite several attempts at blocking teratoma formation, including introduction of suicide genes [13], inhibition of cell-cycle regulatory proteins [14], immunodepletion [15], selecting the desired cell type [16], or introducing cytotoxic antibody [17], a clinically viable strategy to eliminate teratoma formation needs to be developed [18]. In previous study, after establishment in vivo, the typical behavior of teratoma is remodeling microenvironment especially the formation of blood vessels for nutrients to support their growth [19], in which angiogenesis plays a crucial role. Therefore, monitoring the processes of teratoma angiogenesis may provide novel approach for inhibiting the formation of teratoma and direct future clinical translational application of pES cells.

In this study, we developed a teratoma model to monitor the behavior of pES and ES cells in transgenic mice by molecular imaging. A lentiviral vector carrying EF1α promoter, which drives double-fusion construct containing renilla luciferase (Rluc) and red fluorescent protein (RFP) reporter genes, was used to achieve localization of the transplanted cells [20, 21]. Molecular imaging provides the possibility to visually monitor the cellular processes after transplantation, including proliferation and angiogenesis. In addition, transgenic Vegfr2-luc mice expressing Fluc under the promoter of Vegfr2-luc allow us to capture and quantify teratoma angiogenesis in vivo.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

ES cell line was obtained from fertilized embryos of mice while pES cell line was isolated from activated oocytes [22]. These two cell lines were maintained with DMEM (Gibco, Grand Island, NY) on mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) feeder layers, which were preliminary treated with 10 μg/ml mitomycin C. The medium contains 15% ES-qualified fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone, Australia), 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 1% nonessential amino acids (NEAA; Gibco), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco), and 1000 units/ml leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF; Millipore). To detect the trace of transplanted cells in vivo, pES cells and ES cells were transduced with lentiviral vector, which carries an EF1α promoter, driving renilla luciferase (Rluc) and red fluorescent protein (RFP) double-fusion reporter genes (RR), and were named pES-RR and ES-RR, respectively. A bright micrograph of each group was taken to observe cells’ morphology. Culture medium was changed daily, and pES-RR or ES-RR was passaged once every two days.

2.2. Characterization of Reporter Gene-Labeled Cells

The expression of RFP in reporter gene-labeled cells was observed with an inverted fluorescence microscope; meanwhile, the activity of Rluc in these cells was measured by bioluminescence imaging (BLI). BLI was performed using IVIS Lumina II system (Xenogen Corporation, Hopkinton, MA) as described [23]. In sequential noninvasive imaging, pES-RR or ES-RR were cultured in a 24-well plate and then exposed to 1 μg/ml of coelenterazine (NanoLight, Technology, Pinetop, AZ) directly. Imaging was performed immediately with a cooled charge-coupled device (CCD) bioluminescence camera for 3 min. Subsequently, bioluminescence was quantified in units of maximum photons per second per centimeter square per steradian (p/s/cm2/sr). A linear relation between signal intensity and cell number was analyzed using Graphpad Prism 6.0 Software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA).

2.3. Cell Proliferation Assay

Cell proliferation was determined using a trypan blue (Gibco) exclusion assay in triplicate, and population doublings were calculated. pES cells, ES cells, and reporter gene-labeled cells were seeded in 24-well plate at a density of 2 × 104 per well. Five fields per well were selected randomly and marked carefully. Cells in the chosen fields were counted at 24, 48, and 72 h time points.

2.4. Alkaline Phosphatase Staining

To determine the undifferentiated state of transduced cells, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was measured using alkaline phosphatase kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). ES cell, pES cell, and reporter gene-labeled cells were first fixed in 10% formalin, then cells were washed with deionized water for 30 s and incubated with alizarin red premixed solution in a dark environment for 15 mins at room temperature. After a brief rinse, samples were counterstained for 30 s and then washed thrice to remove the dissociative dye. After drying, staining cells were observed with an optical microscopy [24].

2.5. Embryoid Body Formation

To detect differentiation capacity of pES-RR and ES-RR, cells were trypsinized to carry out a single-cell suspension and achieved at a density of 1 × 105 per ml in LIF-deficient ES cell medium. Then, 20 μl cell suspension was seeded on uncoated Petri dishes using hanging drop culture [25]. Primary embryoid body (EB) was formed after 48 hours and then replanted into a 6-well plate-coated gelatin previously cultured with 2 ml ES cell medium without LIF. EBs of each group were harvested at day 6 and day 12 for following gene expression analysis.

2.6. Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Teratoma from day 28 was analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Total RNA was extracted from the samples with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) according to instructions supplied by the manufacturer. Then, 2 μg of total RNA was used for the first-strand cDNA template synthesis, and the manipulation was the same as above. Afterwards, qPCR was performed in triplicate on Opticon® System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and the relative gene expression level of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), VEGFR2, CD34, angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1), angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), and tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin-like loops and epidermal growth factor homology domains 2 (Tie-2) was quantified using TransStart Top Green qPCR SuperMix Kit (TransGen Biotech, China). Relative mRNA folding changes were determined by the 2−ΔΔCT method.

2.7. Teratoma Model

The experiments were approved by the Nankai University Animal Care and Use Committee. All protocols were performed in strict accordance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health (8th edition, 2011). 8–10-week-old female transgenic mice (Xenogen Corp., Hopkinto, MA), expressing firefly luciferase (Fluc) under the promoter of murine vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (vegfr2), were housed under standard laboratory conditions [26]. Mice were injected with 3 × 106 of pES-RR into the right fourth pair of mammary fat pad and 3 × 106 of ES-RR into the opposite site in 100 μl of phosphate-buffered saline (day 0). Teratoma development was tracked by BLI of Rluc, and tumor angiogenesis was evaluated by BLI of Fluc simultaneously. All mice were euthanized and teratomas were harvested for further analysis 4 weeks posttransplantation (day 28).

2.8. Semiquantitative RT-PCR

Complementary DNA (cDNA) template was synthesized from 2 μg of total RNA isolated from EBs collected in advance by using TIANScript RT kit (TIANGEN Biotech, China) and diluted to 50 μl. 1 μl of first-strand cDNA mixture was added to the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) system. Ectodermal-, mesodermal-, endodermal-, and pluripotent-specific marker (Nestin, Brachyury, Gata6, Oct4 and Nanog) were compared among all groups.

2.9. Optical Bioluminescence Imaging

Imaging of Rluc and Fluc expression was aimed at monitoring teratoma development and tumor angiogenesis, respectively. Tumor BLI was performed using IVIS Lumina II system (Xenogen Corporation, Hopkinton, MA) [27]. In short, 2.5 mg/kg of coelenterazine was injected intravenously into transgenic mice, and mice were imaged for 1-2 min to assess Rluc expression immediately. In addition, the same mice with intraperitoneal injection of 150 mg/kg of reporter probe D-Luciferin (Biosynth International, Naperville, IL), were imaged for 1–10 min to evaluate Fluc expression. All animals were scanned from day 0 to day 28. Region of interest (ROI) was drawn over the signals on both mammary fat pads, and imaging signals were analyzed as previously mentioned [28].

2.10. Histological Analysis

The isolated teratoma was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and dehydrated in 30% sucrose overnight. Subsequently, these samples were embedded into optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound (Sakura Finetek, Japan) or paraffin, respectively. Frozen samples or paraffin specimens were both cut into 5 μm thick sections for next staining. For immunofluorescence staining, rat anti-mouse CD31 antibody (BD, San Jose, CA) and Alexa Fluor 488 fluorescent secondary antibody were used to determine angiogenesis in teratomas. Nuclei were visualized with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL), and four representative fields were measured to detect microvascular density (MVD) under fluorescence microscope. Moreover, to investigate differentiation status of teratomas, five consecutive sections of each paraffin sample were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE).

2.11. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was accomplished by using Graphpad Prism 6.0 Software (Graphpad Software Inc.). Two-way repeated measures ANOVA as well as two-tailed Student’s t-test were used. Differences were considered significant at values of <0.05. Unless specified, data were given as mean ± SEM.

3. Result

3.1. Labeling of pES Cells and ES Cells with DF Reporter Genes

To monitor the dynamic processes in teratoma development, we created two cell lines, pES-RR and ES-RR, labeled with double-fusion reporter genes (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). Positive RFP cells were screened by Bsd (Blasticidin), and immunofluorescence assay revealed robust expression of RFP. A strong correlation between Rluc activity and cell number was observed in both pES-RR and ES-RR using Xenogen IVIS system (Figure 1(c)), which demonstrated the possibility to assess cell number in vitro and teratoma growth in vivo by analyzing Rluc signal intensity. Cell number of labeled of pES-RR and ES-RR correlated linearly with Rluc activity (R2 = 0.99).

Figure 1: Generation of pES cells and ES cells labeled with double-fusion reporter genes. (a) Schema of lentiviral construct showing EF1α promoter driving Rluc and RFP. (b) Brightfield and fluorescence microscopy showing RFP expression in pES cells and ES cells. (c) BLI of pES cells and ES cells shows a robust correlation between cell number and Rluc activity.
3.2. Characteristics of pES-RR and ES-RR

After establishing these two cell lines, we examined the proliferation ability of ES-RR (Figure 2(a)) and pES-RR (Figure 2(b)) cultured in standard ES cell conditions. There is no significant difference between pES cells, ES cells, and their wild-type in live cell image and colony formation. These results proved that the transfection of reporter genes does not affect the proliferation ability of pES cells and ES cells. Simultaneously, according to the ALP staining on transfected cells (Figure 2(c)), there is no significant difference in pluripotency of transfected cells compared with wild-type cells. These data indicated that the transfection of reporter gene did not alter the characteristics of pES cells and ES cells, which means we could monitor the behavior of transplanted cells with the expression of reporter gene.

Figure 2: The characterization of reporter gene-labeled cells. (a, b) Cell proliferation activity between wild-type cells and labeled cells shows no significant difference in vitro. (c) The pluripotency of the cells was detected by ALP staining, and undifferentiated cells appear red, whereas MEF cells appear colorless. ALP staining of each group exhibited the transfected report genes does not affect the pluripotency of pES cells and ES cells.
3.3. Visualization of the Teratoma Growth and VEGFR2 Expression Dynamic Processes In Vivo

The restriction of ES cells in potential clinical applications is mainly attributed to the teratoma formation. Therefore, a deeper research in the behavior of teratoma after cell injection is necessary and molecular imaging techniques were used to monitor this process. Within 4 weeks of transplantation, we performed BLI of Rluc in selected time points and analyzed with living imaging software. Results showed that pES-RR is similar to ES-RR. Both of them can form tumor in vivo at the 14th day after transplantation (Figure 3(a)), and the growth rate of tumor was increased over time. However, the tumor formed by pES-RR was significantly smaller than that of ES-RR. Such difference was constantly observed for the entire experimental period up to 28 days. Meanwhile, the formation and development of tumors require recruitment of new blood vessels, which plays an important role in microenvironment formation to support tumor growth. ES-RR and pES-RR were transplanted into VEGFR2-luc transgenic mice. The expression of VEGFR2 induced by angiogenesis could act as an indicator for blood vessel formation monitored by BLI in real time. Increased BLI signal was found in ES-RR group, which suggests that VEGF/VEGFR2 pathways were activated while ES cells have the enhanced capacity of recruiting for host blood vessels (Figure 3(b)).

Figure 3: Visualization of the teratoma growth and VEGFR2 expression in vivo. (a) Rluc imaging of teratoma progression of Rluc signals showed that the teratoma formed in pES-RR group was smaller than that in ES-RR group. Quantification analysis demonstrated there was a significant difference between the two groups. (b) Fluc imaging and quantification analysis of VEGFR2 expression in transgenic mice revealed enhanced angiogenesis in ES cell-derived teratomas. compared with the ES-RR group.
3.4. Histological Analysis

Molecular imaging revealed that teratoma formed by pES cells is significantly weaker than that of ES cells; we speculate on the two major causes of this difference, angiogenesis and multipotential differentiation. To determine the degree of angiogenesis after the cell transplantation, sections were stained with the anti-CD31 antibody. The expression of CD31 could reflect the angiogenesis in teratoma. Results showed that the density of new blood vessels of pES-RR group was significantly weaker than that of ES-RR group (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)).

Figure 4: Analysis of teratoma angiogenesis. (a) Angiogenesis observed in pES-RR group and ES-RR group by CD31 immunofluorescence staining. (b) Microvessel density (MVD) of teratoma tissue was measured by computer image analyzing system. (c) The expression of CD34/VEGF/VEGFR2 was significantly lower in pES-RR group compared with ES-RR group, whereas there was no significant difference in the expression of ANG-1/ANG-2/Tie-2 between these two groups. ; ; .

This difference between pES-RR and ES-RR reminds us to gain insight into the mechanisms of blood vessel formation; we conducted a comparison of gene expression of these two groups. We detected the expression of angiogenesis-related genes including CD34, VEGFA, VEGFR2, Ang-1, Ang-2, and their receptor (Tie-2) by real-time PCR. The results showed that the expression of CD34/VEGF/VEGFR2 in pES-RR was significantly lower than that in ES-RR ( and ). Meanwhile, there is no significant difference in the expression of Ang-1, Ang-2, and Tie-2 between pES-RR group and ES-RR group (Figure 4(c)). Those results indicate that pES-RR has weaker proangiogenic effect than ES-RR, and VEGF/VEGFR2 signal pathway plays a vital role in it.

3.5. Differentiation Potential of pES-RR and ES-RR

After confirming the role of angiogenesis in teratoma formation, we want to test the differentiation potential of pES cells to make sure they retain an extensive differentiation capability in vitro. ES and pES cell differentiation were done by EB formation. EBs were collected after 48 hours and then cultured in differentiation medium to be spontaneously differentiated. The markers of three germ layers including gata6, brachy, nestin, and the stemness marker Oct4 on day 6 and day 12 were detected both in ES-RR group and in pES-RR group (Figure 5(a)). Results showed that there was no significant variation in the differentiation potential between pES-RR and ES-RR in vitro.

Figure 5: Differentiation potential between two cell lineages. (a) RT-PCR analysis of the expression of stemness-related genes of EBs from two groups in D6 and D12, which displayed no significant difference. (b) Teratoma formation of pES-RR and ES-RR. Histological analysis of teratoma identifying the presence of derivatives of all three germ layers: neural tissue (ectoderm), vascular tissue (mesoderm), and glandular tissue (endoderm).

To further investigate the potential of the multidirectional differentiation between ES and pES cells, HE staining was applied for detection of the differentiation of three germ layers in the teratoma tissue. Through the staining results, we can find the markers of three germ layers in the teratoma tissue formed by both pES-RR and ES-RR: the ectoderm (nerve tissue), mesoderm (vascular system), and endoderm (glandular tissue) (Figure 5(b)). The gene expression shows that there is no obvious difference between these two cells in the ability of differentiation in vitro and in vivo.

4. Discussion

Recently, stem cell-based regenerative medicine is rapidly progressing as a promising tool for the repair and replacement of damaged cells, tissues, and organs. In this study, two kinds of stem cells, pES cells and ES cells, were obtained from hybrid mice to make a comparison of their teratoma-forming potentials. With transgenic vegfr2-luc mice [29], we observed transplanted stem cell behavior as well as angiogenesis process dynamically in living animals [21]. Results showed that pES is capable of differentiation into all three germ layers suggesting that there was no significant difference in differentiation potential between pES cells and ES cells. The VEGF/VEGFR2 pathway-related angiogenesis process was paralleled to teratoma growth proving that angiogenesis reflected the growth of teratoma and act as an important diagnosis and treatment target.

In the field of stem cell-based therapy, three types of cells, ES cells, somatic stem cells, and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells), are mainly focused on. ES cells hold great potential in stem cell-based regenerative medicine for their capability to undergo unlimited self-renewal and differentiation. Compared with MSCs derived from mesodermal, ES cells are able to differentiate into every cell type [30], while the immunogenicity and safety of iPS cells produced from genetic method are considered major obstacles to regenerative medicine. ES cells with ability to differentiate into specific target tissues can eliminate some untreated diseases. For example, human ES cell-derived oligodendrocyte progenitors were used in the treatment of depletion of oligodendrocyte progenitors and demyelination following radiation [31].

However, many concerns are hindering the progress in ES cell-based replacement therapy, especially ethical issue, which cannot be solved by research or legislation. Therefore, some other cell resources are seeking to replace ES cells as agent of cell-based tissue regeneration. As a promising alternative, pES cells are further investigated. Their differentiation ability is considered to be similar with ES cells, while ethical issue is not existing in these cells. Recent studies have shown the treatment effects of pES cells in ischemic heart disease, neurodegenerative disease, and tendon injury indicate the active role of pES cells [11, 22, 32]. Although some researchers found that pES cells could form teratoma after cell transplantation, its occurrence and size are smaller than those in ES cells [22]. Thus, the elimination of the teratoma formation risk would greatly facilitate the development of stem cell replacement therapy using pES cells.

In summary, the teratoma model in our present study using transgenic mice with VEGFR2 promoter characterized the behavior of ES cells and pES cells after transplantation. BLI revealed survival and angiogenesis processes of these labeled cells after transplantation in real time. Overall, angiogenesis was paralleled to teratoma growth in initiation, development, and regression, which provides direct evidence for the role of angiogenesis in teratoma formation. Our study confirmed this effect and further demonstrated that VEGF/VEGFR2 signal pathway is closely related with angiogenesis during teratoma formation. We believe that an extensive understanding about teratoma formation mechanisms and angiogenesis stimulated by pES cells can help improve stem cell-based therapeutic in safety and efficacy.

5. Conclusion

Transplanted mouse pES cell-formed teratoma was significantly smaller than that produced by ES cells. These data revealed that the inhibition of VEGF/VEGFR2 signal pathway may reduce the probability of residual cells to form teratomas of ES and pES cells. Therefore, we believed that pES cells might provide safer sources for clinical translational application. However, detailed elucidation of the mechanisms of teratoma formation of ES and pES cells underlying the angiogenesis stimulation awaits further investigation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Hongyan Tao and Xiaoniao Chen contributed equally to this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFA0103200) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (81671734, 81500134).

References

  1. G. Lin, Q. OuYang, X. Zhou et al., “A highly homozygous and parthenogenetic human embryonic stem cell line derived from a one-pronuclear oocyte following in vitro fertilization procedure,” Cell Research, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 999–1007, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. E. Reubinoff, M. F. Pera, C. Y. Fong, A. Trounson, and A. Bongso, “Embryonic stem cell lines from human blastocysts: somatic differentiation in vitro,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 399–404, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Oottamasathien, Y. Wang, K. Williams et al., “Directed differentiation of embryonic stem cells into bladder tissue,” Developmental Biology, vol. 304, no. 2, pp. 556–566, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. H. Kim, H. W. Kim, K. J. Cha et al., “Nanotopography promotes pancreatic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells,” ACS Nano, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 3342–3355, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Rambhatla, C. P. Chiu, P. Kundu, Y. Peng, and M. K. Carpenter, “Generation of hepatocyte-like cells from human embryonic stem cells,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. Ye, R. Mayberry, C. Y. Lo et al., “Generation of human female reproductive tract epithelium from human embryonic stem cells,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 6, article e21136, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. Su, M. Zhou, Y. Zheng et al., “Bioluminescence reporter gene imaging characterize human embryonic stem cell-derived teratoma formation,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 840–848, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. B. Cibelli, K. A. Grant, K. B. Chapman et al., “TParthenogenetic stem cells in nonhuman primates,” Science, vol. 295, no. 5556, p. 819, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. Kim, K. Ng, P. J. Rugg-Gunn et al., “Recombination signatures distinguish embryonic stem cells derived by parthenogenesis and somatic cell nuclear transfer,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 346–352, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. J. Evans and M. H. Kaufman, “Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos,” Nature, vol. 292, no. 5819, pp. 154–156, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. W. Liu, L. Yin, X. Yan et al., “Directing the differentiation of parthenogenetic stem cells into tenocytes for tissue-engineered tendon regeneration,” Stem Cells Translational Medicine, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 196–208, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. A. Isaev, I. Garitaonandia, T. V. Abramihina et al., “In vitro differentiation of human parthenogenetic stem cells into neural lineages,” Regenerative Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Schuldiner, J. Itskovitz-Eldor, and N. Benvenisty, “Selective ablation of human embryonic stem cells expressing a “suicide” gene,” Stem Cells, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 257–265, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. N. E. Huskey, T. Guo, K. J. Evason et al., “CDK1 inhibition targets the p53-NOXA-MCL1 axis, selectively kills embryonic stem cells, and prevents teratoma formation,” Stem Cell Reports, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 374–389, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Tang, A. S. Lee, J. P. Volkmer et al., “An antibody against SSEA-5 glycan on human pluripotent stem cells enables removal of teratoma-forming cells,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 829–834, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Chung, B. S. Shin, E. Hedlund et al., “Genetic selection of sox1GFP-expressing neural precursors removes residual tumorigenic pluripotent stem cells and attenuates tumor formation after transplantation,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 1467–1480, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. B. Choo, H. L. Tan, S. N. Ang et al., “Selection against undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells by a cytotoxic antibody recognizing podocalyxin-like protein-1,” Stem Cells, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1454–1463, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. S. Knoepfler, “Deconstructing stem cell tumorigenicity: a roadmap to safe regenerative medicine,” Stem Cells, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1050–1056, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. W. Y. Zhang, P. E. de Almeida, and J. C. Wu, Teratoma Formation: A Tool for Monitoring Pluripotency in Stem Cell Research, StemBook, Cambridge (MA), 2008.
  20. W. Su, L. Leng, Z. Han, Z. He, and Z. Li, “Bioluminescence imaging of human embryonic stem cell-derived endothelial cells for treatment of myocardial infarction,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1052, pp. 203–215, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. L. Leng, Y. Wang, N. He et al., “Molecular imaging for assessment of mesenchymal stem cells mediated breast cancer therapy,” Biomaterials, vol. 35, no. 19, pp. 5162–5170, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Y. Liu, X. Ye, L. Mao et al., “Transplantation of parthenogenetic embryonic stem cells ameliorates cardiac dysfunction and remodelling after myocardial infarction,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 208–218, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. L. Liang, Z. Yue, W. Du et al., “Molecular imaging of inducible VEGF expression and tumor progression in a breast cancer model,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 407–415, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. Wang, H. Sang, K. Zhang et al., “Stat3 phosphorylation is required for embryonic stem cells ground state maintenance in 2i culture media,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 19, pp. 31227–31237, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Z. J. Li, Z. Z. Wang, Y. Z. Zheng et al., “Kinetic expression of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1/CD31) during embryonic stem cell differentiation,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 559–570, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. Mao, M. Zhu, X. Zhang et al., “A macroporous heparin-releasing silk fibroin scaffold improves islet transplantation outcome by promoting islet revascularisation and survival,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 59, pp. 210–220, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. Wang, K. Zhang, H. Tao et al., “Molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis and therapeutic effects with dual bioluminescence,” Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 422–428, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. N. He, G. Feng, Y. Li et al., “Embryonic stem cell preconditioned microenvironment suppresses tumorigenic properties in breast cancer,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 95, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. G. Feng, J. Zhang, Y. Li et al., “IGF-1 C domain-modified hydrogel enhances cell therapy for AKI,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 2357–2369, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Z. Rong, X. Fu, M. Wang, and Y. Xu, “A scalable approach to prevent teratoma formation of human embryonic stem cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 39, pp. 32338–32345, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. Piao, T. Major, G. Auyeung et al., “Human embryonic stem cell-derived oligodendrocyte progenitors remyelinate the brain and rescue behavioral deficits following radiation,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 198–210, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. Gonzalez, I. Garitaonandia, M. Poustovoitov et al., “Neural stem cells derived from human parthenogenetic stem cells engraft and promote recovery in a nonhuman primate model of Parkinson’s disease,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1945–1966, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus