|
Study | Design | Study location | Population mean age | M/F ratio | Intervention | Outcomes | Follow-up | Flap placement |
|
[19] | RCT BA | Department of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Budapest | 32–56 years | 13 M/11 F | EMD + NBM + PRP versus EMD + NBM | Regenerative surgery of deep infrabony defects | 12 months, 5 years | Coronal advancement |
[18] | RCT SM | University of Dammam, College of Dentistry, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia | 41.4 ± 2.61 years | 7 M/5 F | PRP + torus mandibularis chips versus torus mandibularis chips | Treatment for periodontal infrabony defects | 6 months | Original |
[20] | RCT | Department of Periodontics, Government Dental College and Research Institute, Bangalore, India | 36.8 years | NA | PRP versus OFD | Treatment for periodontal infrabony defects | 9 months | Coronal advancement |
[21] | RCT | Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey | 48.96 ± 6.6 years | 9 M/5 F | B-TCP + PRP versus B-TCP | Therapeutic efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in infrabony defects | 6 months | Original |
[22] | RCT SM | Department of Periodontia, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals Chennai | 20 and 50 years | NA | PRP + HA + B-TCP versus HA + TCP | Clinical effectiveness of regenerative techniques | 6 months | Original |
[23] | RCT BA | Department of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary | 28 to 65 years | 9 M/21 F | PRP + ABBM versus ABBM | Modality to enhance the outcome of regenerative surgery | 12 months | Coronal advancement |
[24] | RCT SM | School of Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Republic of Serbia | 47 ± 10 years | 9 M/14 F | BPBM + GTR + PRP versus BPBM + GTR | Additional benefits provided by the incorporation of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) into a regenerative protocol | 6 months | Original |
[25] | RCT | Division of Periodontology, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona Torrette, Italy | 47 to 72 years | 31 M/29 F | DFDBA + PRP versus DFDBA | Compare PRP combined with DFDBA to DFDBA in the treatment of human intrabony defects | 12 months | Coronal advancement |
[26] | RCT BA | Department of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary | 28 to 58 years | 12 M/16 F | PRP + B-TCP + GTR versus B-TCP + GTR | To enhance the outcome of regenerative surgery | 12 months | Coronal advancement |
[27] | RCT | Department of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary | 32–56 years | 12 M/14 F | EMD + NBM + PRP versus EMD + NBM | To enhance the outcomes of regenerative surgery significantly | 12 months | Coronal advancement |
[28] | RCT BA | Department of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary | 26 to 55 years | 10 M/14 F | PRP + ABBM + GTR or ABBM + GTR | To clinically evaluate the effect of PRP on the healing of deep intrabony defects | 12 months | Coronal advancement |
[29] | RCT | Division of Periodontology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan | 55.5 ± 8.2 years | 21 M/49 F | PRP + HA versus HA + saline | To compare platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combined with a biodegradable ceramic in the treatment of human intrabony defects | 12 months | Original |
[30] | RCT SM | School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles | 41 ± 13 years | 16 M/12 F | BPBM + GTR + PRP versus OFD | Clinical effectiveness of a combination therapy in the regeneration of periodontal intrabony defects in humans | 6 months | Original |
[31] | RCT SM | Private practice, Houston and Department of Periodontics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX | 37 to 74 years | 5 M/8 F | PRP + BDX versus BDX | The combination of PRP and BDX to those obtained from the use of the bone replacement graft alone | 6 months | Coronal advancement |
[32] | RCT SM | Clinical Specialties, Section of Periodontics, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, USA | 39 ± 9 years | 8 M/10 F | PRP + BPBM + GTR versus GTR | Combination therapy in promoting clinical signs of periodontal regeneration in intrabony defects | 6 months | Original |
|