Neu5Ac Induces Human Dental Pulp Stem Cell Osteo-/Odontoblastic Differentiation by Enhancing MAPK/ERK Pathway Activation

Li, Changzhou; Xie, Xinghuan; Liu, Zhongjun; Yang, Jianhua; Zuo, Daming; Xu, Shuaimei

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5560872

Stem Cells International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Stem Cell Therapies for Connective Tissue Regeneration toward Joint Preservation

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 5560872 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5560872

Neu5Ac Induces Human Dental Pulp Stem Cell Osteo-/Odontoblastic Differentiation by Enhancing MAPK/ERK Pathway Activation

Changzhou Li,^1,2Xinghuan Xie,¹Zhongjun Liu,³Jianhua Yang,⁴Daming Zuo,^1,5and Shuaimei Xu³

Academic Editor: Liang Gao

Received09 Jan 2021

Revised26 Apr 2021

Accepted09 Aug 2021

Published23 Sept 2021

Abstract

Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) must undergo odontoblastic differentiation in order to facilitate the process of dentin-pulp complex repair. Herein, we sought to explore the ability of Neu5Ac (one form of sialic acid) to influence DPSC osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation via modulating mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling. Methodology. DPSCs were isolated from human third permanent teeth and were grown in vitro. Fluorescent microscopy was used to detect the existence of sialic acid on the DPSC membrane. Following the treatment of different concentrations of Neu5Ac and removing sialic acid from the cell surface by neuraminidase, the osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation of these cells was evaluated via mineralization, alkaline phosphatase, and in vivo assays. In addition, the expression of genes related to osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation and MAPK signaling at different stages of this differentiation process was analyzed in the presence or absence of Neu5Ac. Results. The existence of sialic acid on the DPSC membrane was confirmed by fluorescent microscopy, and the ability of osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation was decreased after removing sialic acid by neuraminidase. Treatment of DPSCs with Neu5Ac (0.1 mM or 1 mM) significantly enhanced their mineralization ability and alkaline phosphatase activity. The expression levels of DMP1, DSPP, BSP, and RUNX2 were also increased. Treatment of nude mice with ManNAc (the prerequisite form of Neu5Ac) also enhanced DPSC mineralization activity in vivo. Furthermore, Neu5Ac treatment enhanced p-ERK expression in DPSCs, while ERK pathway inhibition disrupted the ability of Neu5Ac to enhance the osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation of these cells. Conclusions. Neu5Ac can promote DPSC osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation through a process associated with the modulation of the ERK signaling pathway activity.

1. Introduction

Stem cells from oral cavity are easily harvestable and have shown a great plasticity towards the main lineages, specifically towards bone tissues [1]. Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) are the most investigated and commonly evaluated in the context of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine [2]. Their clinical utility, however, is limited by the fact that relatively few of these cells are available, and they lose their ability to differentiate over the course of in vitro expansion [3]. Enhancing the utility of these cells in clinical tissue engineering contexts will therefore necessitate the development of novel approaches to improving DPSC osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation capacity. Many factors to date have been found to impact this differentiation capacity, such as proinflammatory cytokines [4], growth factors [5], mechanical stretch, bioscaffolds/biomaterials [6, 7], and donor age [8]. Previous studies suggested that tissue inflammation may act against the tooth/bone formation/repair, and some natural compounds may be useful to alleviate this effect [9, 10]. These findings underscore the fact that the external microenvironment is a key determinant of DPSC fate, indicating that accurately recapitulating these conditions may represent a viable approach to apply these cells in the context of tissue regeneration.

Sialic acid (SA) is a component of cell surface sugar moieties that are associated with N- and O-glycan chains and glycolipids wherein it can be attached via α2-3, α2-6, and α2-8 linkages [11]. SA expression is evident across vertebrate and nonvertebrate species and in mammals. It was primarily found in two major forms: N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) and N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc) [12]. Of these forms, only Neu5Ac is found in healthy humans [13], wherein it serves as an important regulator of interactions between cells and of signaling, enzymatic, and antibody-related activities [14].

The functional roles of sialic acid in many experimental contexts are well understood. Li et al. explored its role in the context of tumor cell proliferation and migration by removing sialic acid from the AGS gastric cancer cell line [15]. This led these authors to discover that MAL-II could specifically recognize and interact with terminal sialic acid residues within glycoprotein chains. Furthermore, they found that the treatment of AGS cells with α2,3-neuraminidase, which cleaved cell surface sialic acid, enhanced the repair and migratory capabilities of these cells, highlighting the ability of sialic acid to drive cell-related signaling and behavior. Xu et al. further found that reductions in the SA expression on an osteoblast cell line were associated with decreases in both bone mineralization and the expression of bone sialoprotein (BSP), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and vitamin D receptor, indicating that SA plays key roles in the context of osteogenesis [16]. SA is closely related to many oral diseases such as recurrent aphthous ulcer, oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD), and oral cancers [17]. Patients with OPMD and oral cancers exhibit a high SA concentration in the serum and saliva [17], while patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis and other oral inflammations exhibit a low concentration of sialic acid [18]. As a kind of mesenchymal stem cells, DPSC has a great potential in oral clinical treatment. The specific role played by sialic acid in the context of DPSC osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation, however, has yet to be explored.

The present study was thus designed to assess whether Neu5Ac treatment was sufficient to enhance DPSC osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation, and if so, what signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms underlie such enhancement.

2. Methodology

2.1. DPSC Isolation and Culture

Caries-free third molars from 10 healthy patients (20–24 years old) were collected immediately following the extraction and were used to isolate DPSCs. Dental pulp was isolated under sterile conditions and rinsed with PBS, after which they were minced using a ophthalmological scissors, and pulp aliquots were transferred into 6-well plates containing general medium (GM) composed of α-MEM containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco, USA). Cells were cultured in a 37°C with 5% CO₂ incubator, with media being changed every other day until cells reached confluence, at which time cells were passaged. Cells were used for experimentation following 3-5 passages. Osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation was induced in GM supplemented with 50 mg/ml ascorbic acid, 10 mM β-glycerol phosphates, and 10⁻⁷ mol/l dexamethasone. DPSC cell surface expression of stem cell markers (CD29, CD31, CD34, CD44, CD45, CD90, and CD105) was assessed via flow cytometry using antibodies from BD Biosciences (USA). The ethics committee of the Stomatological Hospital of Southern Medical University approved this study.

2.2. Treatment of DPSC with Neuraminidase or Neu5Ac

To evaluate the role of cell surface sialic acid in the odontoblastic differentiation process, DPSCs were treated with Neu5Ac or neuraminidase, which desialylated cell surface glycoconjugates. The impact of Neu5Ac on DPSCs was assessed by treating them with 0 mM, 0.1 mM, or 1 mM of Neu5Ac (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) added to the cell culture media. With regard to neuraminidase, DPSCs were exposed to neuraminidase (0 mU/ml, 1 mU/ml, 10 mU/ml, or 100 mU/ml, Sigma-Aldrich).

2.3. Cell Viability Assay (CCK-8 Assay)

The cell viability was detected by Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan). Briefly, the cells were exposed to 0 mM, 0.1 mM, or 1 mM of Neu5Ac or 0 mU/ml, 1 mU/ml, 10 mU/ml, or 100 mU/ml of neuraminidase in 96-well plates for 1, 3, 5, or 7 days, and six wells were prepared for each dose of Neu5Ac and neuraminidase. After treatment, 10 μl of CCK-8 solution was added to each well, and the 96-well plate was continuously incubated at 37°C for 1 hour; then, the OD value for each well was read at wavelength 450 nm to determine the cell viability on a microplate reader (Multiskan, Thermo, USA).

2.4. qRT-PCR

Cells were plated at cells/well and were treated for 4, 7, or 14 days with neuraminidase (0 mU/ml, 1 mU/ml, 10 mU/ml, or 100 mU/ml) or Neu5Ac (0 mM, 0.1 mM, or 1 mM), after which TRIzol (Invitrogen, CA, USA) was used to extract total cell RNA based on provided instructions. A First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Gibco, USA) was then used to prepare cDNA from 1 g of total RNA per sample, after which qRT-PCR was conducted with SYBR green (Takara, Japan) and a thermocycler instrument (ABI7500, Applied Biosystems, USA). The 2^-ΔΔCt method was employed to evaluate relative gene expression, with GAPDH being used as a normalization control. Primers used in this analysis are shown in Table 1.

2.5. Western Blotting

Western blotting was used to assess the MAPK signaling pathway and odontoblastic differentiation-related protein expression in DPSCs that were (1) treated with neuraminidase (0, 1, 10, or 100 mU/ml) for 4 days; (2) treated with Neu5Ac (0, 0.1, or 1 mM) for 4, 7, or 14 days; (3) treated with Neu5Ac (1 mM) for 0, 10, 30, 60, 90 minutes or for 3 days; and (4) pretreated with the extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) inhibitor cobimetinib (1 μM) for 4 hours and then treated with or without Neu5Ac (1 mM) for 4 days.

Following the above treatments, DPSCs were washed twice with PBS before resuspension in lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA) supplemented with phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) to facilitate protein extraction. A BCA assay was used to quantify protein levels in these extracts, after which samples were separated via SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. Blots were blocked for 1 hour with 5% nonfat milk, after which they were probed overnight with anti-DSPP, anti-DMP1, anti-RUNX2, anti-phospho-ERK, anti-ERK, anti-phospho-p38, anti-p38, anti-phospho-JNK, or anti-JNK (Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA) at 4°C. Blots were then probed with appropriate secondary antibodies for 1 hour, after which protein bands were detected via a chemiluminescent approach.

2.6. ALP Staining

DPSCs were initially cultured in 6-well plates (/well) in the presence or absence of Neu5Ac or neuraminidase for 7 days. Culture media were then removed, and cells were fixed for 1 hour with 70% ethanol, after which they were stained with 300 μl of ALP staining reagent (1-Step NBT/BCIP solution, Thermo Fisher Scientific) per well. Water was then added to terminate staining, and the stain was extracted via the addition of 10% () cetylpyridinium chloride (Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 minutes. Staining intensity was then quantified using a VERSA max Multiplate Reader by assessing absorbance at 540 nm.

2.7. Alizarin Red Staining

DPSCs were initially grown for 21 days in the presence of neuraminidase, Neu5Ac and/or cobimetinib, after which culture media were removed and cells were rinsed with PBS. Cells were then fixed for 1 hour using 70% chilled ethanol, followed by staining for 15 minutes with 40 mM Alizarin S (pH 4.2) at room temperature with gentle stirring. Cells were then washed five times using PBS, after which staining was quantified via extracting the stain for 15 minutes with 10% () cetylpyridinium chloride (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and evaluating absorbance at 540 nm with a VERSA max Multiplate Reader.

2.8. Fluorescent Microscopy

The existence of sialic acid on the DPSC membrane was detected as described previously [19]. Neuraminidase-treated (100 mU/ml, 3 hour) and untreated DPSCs were washed with PBS three times, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes at room temperature (RT), rinsed with PBS for three times, and then blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Solarbio) for 1 hour. Washed with PBS three times, incubated with 10 μg/ml fluorescein isothiocyanate- (FITC-) labeled lectin A. hypogaea (PNA) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) overnight in a moist chamber at 4°C. PNA can bind to the galactose moiety exposed on cell surface glycoconjugates after removing the terminal sialic acid. The next day, samples were incubated with DAPI (1 : 200) for 15 minutes at room temperature. Fluorescence microscopy images were captured under a fluorescence microscope (IX71 FL, Olympus).

2.9. In Vivo Osteogenesis Assay

In vivo ectopic osteogenesis was evaluated by subcutaneously implanting passage 3 DPSCs that had been mixed with 40 mg of 1.0 mm hydroxyapatite/β-tricalcium phosphate (HA/β-TCP) particles (ratio 3 : 8; Sichuan University Biomaterials Engineering Research Center, Chengdu, China) into the backs of nude mice (BALB/c, 6-weeks-old; Bianco, Kuznetsov, Riminucci, & Gehron Robey, 2006). A total of 8 mice were randomly divided into two groups with 4 mice per group; each group contains 2 female mice and 2 male mice. Mice were gavaged for 6 consecutive weeks with ManNAc (2 g/kg/animal/day) every day. The reason for choosing ManNAc over Neu5Ac is because ManNAc is the prerequisite form of Neu5Ac and can only transform to Neu5Ac in the animal organism. In addition, the absorption of ManNAc in vivo is better than that of Neu5Ac [20], beginning on day 2 following implantation. Control animals were administered PBS in lieu of ManNAc every day. Following the 6-week treatment period, the transplanted region was fixed, demineralized with 10% EDTA solution for 7 days, paraffin-embedded, and cut into 2 μm sections that were then subjected to hematoxylin and eosin staining. DSPP and RUNX2 were then detected via immunohistochemical (IHC) staining with an appropriate antibody (1 : 50; ab122321; Abcam). The immunostained images were analyzed and scored by two pathologists independently in a blinded manner, based on the -score method, which considers the percentage of cells staining positively together with the staining intensity [21, 22]. 10 fields at 400x magnification were chosen randomly. The staining intensity of weak, intermediate, and strong staining was scored as 0, 1, 2, and 3, corresponding to the negative control. The total number of cells and cells stained at each intensity were counted in each field. The -score was calculated according to the formula: . -scores ranged from 0 to 300 where 300 indicated 100% of cells strongly stained (3+). -scores of cells ≥200 were defined as a high expression. The Ethics Committee of Southern Medical University approved these animal studies. In vivo cell viability assay, KI67 was detected via immunohistochemical (IHC) staining with an appropriate antibody (1 : 50; ab122321; Abcam). The immunostained images were analyzed and scored by two pathologists independently in a blinded manner based on the -score method which has mentioned above.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Experiments were conducted in triplicate, and data are . SPSS v17.0 was used for all statistical testing. Data were statistically analyzed using Student’s -test, with as the significance threshold. All graphs were plotted using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. DPSC Identification

We first validated the identity of the DPSCs used in the present study via flow cytometry. This analysis confirmed that these cells were positive for mesenchymal stem cell markers CD29, CD44, CD90, and CD105 while negative for the hematopoietic stem cell markers CD31, CD34, and CD45. These results suggested that we successfully isolated and cultured the DPSCs (Figure 1).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

3.2. Desialylation of DPSC by Neuraminidase Inhibits Osteo-/Odontoblastic Differentiation of DPSC

FITC-PNA fluorescent staining was used to detect the existence of sialic acid on the DPSC surface. We observed no FITC-PNA fluorescent staining in untreated DPSCs, while FITC-PNA fluorescent staining was significant enhanced in neuraminidase-treated DPSCs (Figure 2(a)). This proved that neuraminidase can effectively remove the sialic acid on the DPSC surface and indirectly proved the existence of sialic acid on the DPSC membrane. After we treated DPSC with different concentrations (0, 1, 10, and 100 mU/ml) of neuraminidase for 1, 3, 5, or 7 days, the CCK-8 assay showed that there was no significant difference in the OD value of each group of cells, indicating that the concentrations of neuraminidase used in this study had no significant effect on the viability of DPSC (Figure 2(b)). Removing sialic acid from the DPSC membrane by neuraminidase reduced the mRNA expression levels of osteo-/odontogenic markers DMP1, DSPP, BSP, and RUNX2 (Figure 2(c)). Western blot analysis showed that neuraminidase also inhibited the protein levels of RUNX2, DMP1, and DSPP (Figure 2(d)). Consistent with the results of protein and mRNA expressions, neuraminidase could reduce the staining of ALP and Alizarin red, as indicated that neuraminidase could inhibit the formation of calcified nodules (Figure 2(e)). Together, these results suggested that DPSC odontoblastic differentiation was decreased in the absence of Neu5Ac.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 2

The effect of neuraminidase on DPSC osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation. (a) FITC-PNA lectin staining of DPSCs with or without neuraminidase (100 mU/ml) treatment. (b) CCK-8 assay results of neuraminidase-treated DPSC. (c) mRNA expression of DMP1, DSPP, BSP, and RUNX2 in DPSCs treated with neuraminidase (0, 1, 10, and 100 mU/ml) for 4 days. (d) Protein expression of DSPP, DMP1, and RUNX2 in DPSCs treated with neuraminidase (0, 1, 10, and 100 mU/ml) for 4 days. (e) ALP activity and Alizarin red staining after DPSCs were treated with neuraminidase (0, 1, 10, and 100 mU/ml). μm. , , and . All the experiments were repeated at least three times independently.

3.3. The Impact of Neu5Ac on DPSC Odontoblastic Differentiation

In order to evaluate the impact of Neu5Ac on DPSC odontoblastic differentiation, we firstly treated DPSC with different concentrations (0, 0.1, or 1 mM) of Neu5Ac for an indicated time point, and the CCK-8 assay showed that the concentrations of Neu5Ac used in this study had no significant effect on the viability of DPSC (Figure 3(a)). Next, we assessed the expression of key osteo-/odontogenic marker genes in cells. The data revealed that Neu5Ac treatment was associated with significant increases in the mRNA expressions of DSPP, DMP1, BSP, and RUNX2 (Figure 3(b)). This was further supported by the protein level expressions of DMP1, DSPP, and RUNX2 in Neu5Ac-treated cells (Figure 3(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 3

The impact of Neu5Ac on DPSC osteo-/odotoblastic differentiation. (a) CCK-8 assay results of Neu5Ac-treated DPSC. (b) qRT-PCR detected the expressions of DMP1, DSPP, BSP, and RUNX2 after treating DPSCs with Neu5Ac (0.1 or 1 mM) for 4, 7, or 14 days, with GAPDH used as a normalization control. (c) DMP1, DSPP, and RUNX2 protein expressions were detected by western blotting. (d) The ability of DPSC with Neu5Ac treatment (0.1 and 1 mM) assessed via ALP activity and Alizarin red staining. Data are . , , or . All the experiments were repeated at least three times independently.

We additionally observed clear evidence of dose-dependent enhancement of ALP activity in Neu5Ac-treated cells on day 7 after the induction of osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation. Additionally, Alizarin red staining conducted on day 14 was used to evaluate the impact of Neu5Ac on mineralization activity. The result exhibited enhanced mineralization activity in response to Neu5Ac treatment at this time point compared to control treatment (Figure 3(d)). Furthermore, we conducted in vivo osteogenesis assays and observed enhanced osteogenesis in ManNAc-treated mice compared to control animals, determined by HE staining and IHC staining with DSPP and RUNX2. Notably, KI67 immunohistochemistry showed no significant difference in cell viability between the two groups (Figure 4). Taken together, in vitro and in vivo experiments indicated that Neu5Ac positively correlated with the osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation of DPSCs.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.4. Neu5Ac Activates ERK Signaling to Drive DPSC Mineralization

Lastly, we evaluated the relationship between the MAPK signaling pathway and Neu5Ac-mediated enhancement of DPSC osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation. We observed no changes in the protein level expressions of total ERK, JNK, or p38 following Neu5Ac treatment. Interestingly, we observed significant increases in p-ERK levels that peaked at 30 minutes post-Neu5Ac treatment and remained elevated for at least 90 minutes. Even on day 3 posttreatment, the p-ERK/ERK ratio was obviously higher for cells treated with Neu5Ac (0.1 and 1 mM) relative to that in untreated control cells (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). No changes in p-JNK or p-p38 levels were detected throughout treatment. To evaluate the role of ERK pathway signaling on Neu5Ac-mediated enhancement of DPSC mineralization, we next pretreated DPSCs with the ERK inhibitor cobimetinib. This analysis revealed that ERK inhibition abrogated the Neu5Ac-induced upregulation of DMP1, DSPP, and RUNX2 in these DPSCs (Figures 5(c) and 5(d)). These findings indicated that Neu5Ac influences DPSC differentiation mainly via the ERK pathway.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 5

Neu5Ac enhances DPSC osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation via activating ERK signaling. (a) ERK, p-ERK, p38, p-p38, JNK, and p-JNK levels in DPSCs were evaluated following a 3-day treatment with Neu5Ac (0, 0.1, or 1 mM) via Western blotting. (b) The p-ERK/total ERK, p-p38/total p38, and p-JNK/total JNK ratios were determined for DPSCs following treatment with 1 mM Neu5Ac for 0, 10, 30, 60, or 90 minutes via Western blotting. (c) DMP1, DSPP, and RUNX2 protein levels in DPSCs treated with either Neu5Ac and/or cobimetinib were measured. (d) Alizarin red staining of DPSCs was conducted following a 14-day treatment period with cobimetinib and/or Neu5Ac. , . All the experiments were repeated at least three times independently.

4. Discussion

In recent years, with the in-depth studies of stem cells, many types of stem cells have shown their clinical therapeutic potential [23–27]. The stable and reliable sources of stem cells is particularly important [28]. DPSCs can be readily isolated following the extraction of healthy teeth, and these cells are highly amenable to proliferating and differentiating into osteo-/odontoblasts [29], making them ideally suited to use in bone and dental tissue engineering. However, the clinical applicability of these cells has been limited to date because they rapidly lose their ability to proliferate and undergo multipotent differentiation throughout prolonged in vitro culture [30]. Therefore, it is vital that novel strategies capable of stimulating prolonged DPSC proliferation and differentiation be developed. As such, we herein evaluated the ability of Neu5Ac to enhance DPSC odontoblastic differentiation. To determine whether there is SA on the surface of DPSCs, we firstly assumed that there was SA on the surface of the cells. After treatment with neuraminidase, FITC-PNA fluorescent staining was significantly enhanced. This proved that neuraminidase can effectively remove the sialic acid on the DPSC surface and indirectly proved the existence of sialic acid on the DPSC membrane.

ALP activity and expression are an early indicator of osteoblastogenesis [31], whereas Alizarin red staining can reliably detect mineralized nodules [32]. We found that treating DPSCs with Neu5Ac was sufficient to enhance both ALP activity and the formation of mineralized nodules. We also evaluated the expression of key odontoblastic differentiation-related genes, including the dentin-specific DSPP [33], and the osteogenesis marker genes DMP1, BSP, and RUNX2 [34]. We observed clear increases in DSPP, DMP1, and RUNX2 protein levels as well as BSP mRNA level in DPSCs that had been treated with Neu5Ac, thus emphasizing the ability of Neu5Ac to enhance the osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation of these cells.

The results of the present study suggested that sialic acid played an important role in DPSC odontoblast differentiation. Removing SA from cell surface appeared to strongly inhibit odontoblast differentiation, while treatment with a high concentration of Neu5Ac presented the opposite tendency. These data indicated that SA was involved in the DPSC odontoblast differentiation process. Considering that SA played an important role in the cell-cell adhesion process [35, 36], SA may influence the DPSC odontoblast differentiation through cell-cell fusion.

MAPK are cytoplasmic serine/threonine kinases that are universally expressed in mammalian cells. Many cytokines and other stimuli can induce ERK1/2 activation, thereby modulating cellular proliferation and division. Owing to the ability of ERK pathway signaling to enhance tumor cell proliferation, ERK inhibitors have been considered potential anticancer drugs [37]. p38 MAPK serves as a regulator of cytokine expression and is in turn activated in response to inflammatory cytokine signaling [38]. As such, p38 is a central regulator of the immune system activity in pathological and physiological contexts. JNKs are stress-activated kinases that control cell survival or apoptotic death in response to diverse stress-related stimuli [37]. MAPK pathway activation has been shown to be a key regulator of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation [39]. Treatment of human DPSCs with LPS induced p38 and ERK activation and downstream IL-8 production [40], and ERK activity is also vital for DMP1, DSPP, and RUNX2 activation within DPSCs [41]. Previous research suggested that sialic acid-binding lectin can induce the intracellular activation of signaling cascades, including the MAPK cascades [42]. We speculated that SA-binding lectin and SA may have something in common, so we tested whether sialic acid (Neu5Ac) affected the MAPK pathway. Herein, we observed no changes in total ERK, JNK, or p38 levels in Neu5Ac-treated DPSCs, whereas p-ERK expression was significantly enhanced in these cells. This suggests that ERK pathway activation is crucial for the SA treatment of DPSCs. We detected no changes in p38 or JNK phosphorylation as a function of Neu5Ac treatment, indicating that these pathways were unaffected by Neu5Ac. To further confirm the relevance of ERK signaling in the context of Neu5Ac-induced DPSC osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation, we treated these cells with the ERK inhibitor cobimetinib. Inhibition of ERK activity reduced DSPP, DMP1, and RUNX2 protein expressions compared to the Neu5Ac group, thus confirming that ERK pathway activation is necessary in order for Neu5Ac to enhance DPSC odontoblastic differentiation.

In summary, the results of the present study revealed that desialylation of DPSC by neuraminidase inhibited osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation while Neu5Ac treatment was able to enhance DPSC osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation. We further determined that ERK signaling was necessary for Neu5Ac to mediate such enhanced differentiation in DPSCs. However, this research only studied the effect of Neu5Ac on the osteo-/odontoblastic differentiation of DPSC. Investigations of Neu5Ac on the development and clinical values of the teeth require further scrutiny.

Data Availability

The data, used during the study, is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Changzhou Li and Xinghuan Xie contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81800957).

References

G. Spagnuolo, B. Codispoti, M. Marrelli, C. Rengo, S. Rengo, and M. Tatullo, “Commitment of oral-derived stem cells in dental and maxillofacial applications,” Dentistry journal, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 72, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. C. Kim, H. Bae, I. K. Kwon et al., “Osteoblastic/cementoblastic and neural differentiation of dental stem cells and their applications to tissue engineering and regenerative medicine,” Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 235–244, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yu, H. He, C. Tang et al., “Differentiation potential of STRO-1+ dental pulp stem cells changes during cell passaging,” BMC Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 32, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Yang, S. Zhang, X. Pang, and M. Fan, “Pro-inflammatory cytokines induce odontogenic differentiation of dental pulp-derived stem cells,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 669–677, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. G. Kim, J. Zhou, C. Solomon et al., “Effects of growth factors on dental stem/progenitor cells,” Dental Clinics of North America, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 563–575, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hata, K. Naruse, S. Ozawa et al., “Mechanical stretch increases the proliferation while inhibiting the osteogenic differentiation in dental pulp stem cells,” Tissue Engineering Part A, vol. 19, no. 5-6, pp. 625–633, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ballini, A. Boccaccio, R. Saini, P. Van Pham, and M. Tatullo, “Dental-derived stem cells and their secretome and interactions with bioscaffolds/biomaterials in regenerative medicine: from the in vitro research to translational applications,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2017, Article ID 6975251, 3 pages, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Ma, Z. Ma, X. Zhang et al., “Effect of Age and Extrinsic Microenvironment on the Proliferation and Osteogenic Differentiation of Rat Dental Pulp Stem Cells In Vitro,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 1546–1553, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Inchingolo, M. Tatullo, M. Marrelli et al., “Clinical trial with bromelain in third molar exodontia,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 771–774, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Tatullo, M. Marrelli, M. Amantea et al., “Bioimpedance detection of oral lichen planus used as preneoplastic model,” Journal of Cancer, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 976–983, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. M. Varki and A. Varki, “Diversity in cell surface sialic acid presentations: implications for biology and disease,” Lab Invest, vol. 87, no. 9, article BF3700656, pp. 851–857, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Schauer and J. P. Kamerling, “Exploration of the sialic acid world,” Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, vol. 75, pp. 1–213, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Virion, S. Doly, K. Saha et al., “Sialic acid mediated mechanical activation of β₂ adrenergic receptors by bacterial pili,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 4752, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Macauley, P. R. Crocker, and J. C. Paulson, “Siglec-mediated regulation of immune cell function in disease,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 653–666, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhou, Y. Zhai, C. Liu et al., “Sialidase NEU1 suppresses progression of human bladder cancer cells by inhibiting fibronectin-integrin α5β1 interaction and Akt signaling pathway,” Cell Communication and Signaling: CCS, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 44, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Xu, W. Xu, G. Xu et al., “Effects of cell surface α2-3 sialic acid on osteogenesis,” Glycoconjugate Journal, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 677–685, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Dadhich, V. Prabhu, V. R. Pai, J. D'Souza, S. Harish, and M. Jose, “Serum and salivary sialic acid as a biomarker in oral potentially malignant disorders and oral cancer,” Indian Journal of Cancer, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 214–218, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zad, S. A. Flowers, M. Bankvall, M. Jontell, and N. G. Karlsson, “Salivary mucin MUC7 oligosaccharides in patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 2147–2152, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. M. Stamatos, S. Curreli, D. Zella, and A. S. Cross, “Desialylation of glycoconjugates on the surface of monocytes activates the extracellular signal-related kinases ERK 1/2 and results in enhanced production of specific cytokines,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 307–313, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. K. Niethamer, T. Yardeni, P. Leoyklang et al., “Oral monosaccharide therapies to reverse renal and muscle hyposialylation in a mouse model of GNE myopathy,” Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 748–755, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Früh and M. Pless, “EGFR IHC score for selection of cetuximab treatment: ready for clinical practice?” Translational lung cancer research, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 145-146, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Detre, G. Saclani Jotti, and M. Dowsett, “A "quickscore" method for immunohistochemical semiquantitation: validation for oestrogen receptor in breast carcinomas,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 876–878, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Kuehnle and M. A. Goodell, “The therapeutic potential of stem cells from adults,” BMJ (Clinical Research Ed), vol. 325, no. 7360, pp. 372–376, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Cossu, M. Birchall, T. Brown et al., “Lancet Commission: Stem cells and regenerative medicine,” Lancet (London, England), vol. 391, pp. 883–910, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Gao, R. Guo, Z. Han, J. Liu, and X. Chen, “Clinical trial reporting,” Lancet (London, England), vol. 396, no. 10261, pp. 1488-1489, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Xiong, Y. He, L. Gao et al., “Smurf1-targeting miR-19b-3p-modified BMSCs combined PLLA composite scaffold to enhance osteogenic activity and treat critical-sized bone defects,” Biomaterials Science, vol. 8, no. 21, pp. 6069–6081, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Guo, L. Gao, and B. Xu, “Current evidence of adult stem cells to enhance anterior cruciate ligament treatment: a systematic review of animal trials,” Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery: official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 331–340.e2, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. E. Fibbe, “Mesenchymal stem cells. A potential source for skeletal repair,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 61, Supplement 2, pp. 29ii–2931, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Gronthos, M. Mankani, J. Brahim, P. G. Robey, and S. Shi, “Postnatal human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 25, pp. 13625–13630, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Horibe, M. Murakami, K. Iohara et al., “Isolation of a stable subpopulation of mobilized dental pulp stem cells (MDPSCs) with high proliferation, migration, and regeneration potential is independent of age,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 5, article e98553, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Magnusson and J. R. Farley, “Differences in sialic acid residues among bone alkaline phosphatase isoforms: a physical, biochemical, and immunological characterization,” Calcified Tissue International, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 508–518, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Wang, G. Wang, B. Wang, and H. Yang, “Activation of TGR5 promotes osteoblastic cell differentiation and mineralization,” Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie, vol. 108, pp. 1797–1803, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Chen, Y. Zhang, A. Ramachandran, and A. George, “DSPP is essential for normal development of the dental-craniofacial complex,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 302–310, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Zhou, Q. Li, X. Lin et al., “BMP2 induces chondrogenic differentiation, osteogenic differentiation and endochondral ossification in stem cells,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 366, no. 1, pp. 101–111, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. T. Keppler, S. Hinderlich, J. Langner, R. Schwartz-Albiez, W. Reutter, and M. Pawlita, “UDP-GlcNAc 2-epimerase: a regulator of cell surface sialylation,” Science (New York, NY), vol. 284, no. 5418, pp. 1372–1376, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Hartnell, J. Steel, H. Turley, M. Jones, D. G. Jackson, and P. R. Crocker, “Characterization of human sialoadhesin, a sialic acid binding receptor expressed by resident and inflammatory macrophage populations,” Blood, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 288–296, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. L. Johnson and R. Lapadat, “Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways mediated by ERK, JNK, and p38 protein kinases,” Science (New York, NY), vol. 298, no. 5600, pp. 1911-1912, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Su, S. Zong, C. Wei et al., “Salidroside promotes rat spinal cord injury recovery by inhibiting inflammatory cytokine expression and NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 234, no. 8, pp. 14259–14269, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Binétruy, L. Heasley, F. Bost, L. Caron, and M. Aouadi, “Concise review: regulation of embryonic stem cell lineage commitment by mitogen-activated protein kinases,” Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1090–1095, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. He, T. Qu, Q. Yu et al., “LPS induces IL-8 expression through TLR4, MyD88, NF-kappaB and MAPK pathways in human dental pulp stem cells,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 128–136, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Huang, R. G. Hill, and S. C. F. Rawlinson, “Strontium (Sr) elicits odontogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs): a therapeutic role for Sr in dentine repair?” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 38, pp. 201–211, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Kariya, T. Tatsuta, S. Sugawara, Y. Kariya, K. Nitta, and M. Hosono, “RNase activity of sialic acid-binding lectin from bullfrog eggs drives antitumor effect via the activation of p38 MAPK to caspase-3/7 signaling pathway in human breast cancer cells,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1334–1342, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Changzhou Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

499

Downloads

763

Citations