The Role of RNA Methylation in Regulating Stem Cell Fate and Function-Focus on m<sup>6</sup>A

Sun, Weiwei; Zhang, Bin; Bie, Qingli; Ma, Na; Liu, Na; Shao, Zewei

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8874360

Stem Cells International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 8874360 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8874360

The Role of RNA Methylation in Regulating Stem Cell Fate and Function-Focus on m⁶A

Weiwei Sun,¹Bin Zhang,²Qingli Bie,²Na Ma,¹Na Liu,¹and Zewei Shao¹

Academic Editor: Ann Steele

Received14 Jul 2020

Revised18 Jul 2021

Accepted23 Sept 2021

Published28 Oct 2021

Abstract

The biological role of RNA methylation in stem cells has attracted increasing attention. Recent studies have demonstrated that RNA methylation plays a crucial role in self-renewal, differentiation, and tumorigenicity of stem cells. In this review, we focus on the biological role of RNA methylation modifications including N6-methyladenosine, 5-methylcytosine, and uridylation in embryonic stem cells, adult stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, and cancer stem cells, so as to provide new insights into the potential innovative treatments of cancer or other complex diseases.

1. Introduction

More than 150 types of RNA modifications have been identified, and they are widely distributed among various types of RNA, such as messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), ribosomal RNA (rRNA), microRNA (miRNA), and long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) [1]. RNA methylation is one of the most crucial modifications, which mainly includes N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A), 5-methylcytosine (m⁵C), and uridylation (U-tail) [1, 2]. In general, RNA methylation has distinct functions in different types of RNA. Stem cells are a group of cells with self-renewal and multidirectional differentiation potential [3]. They are the core constituent of regenerative medicine and have been widely used in the treatment of various diseases, such as nervous system, immune system, and hematopoietic diseases [4]. Recent studies have shown that RNA methylation plays a crucial role in the self-renewal and differentiation of stem cells and tumorigenicity of cancer stem cells (CSCs) [5].

Among the RNA methylation modifications, m⁶A is one of the most abundant modifications in eukaryotes, and the epitranscriptomic detection technology has been focused on m⁶A, making it the most in-depth modification in stem cells. However, perhaps due to the lack of effective methods for detecting other RNA modification sites, the research on m⁵C and U-tail in stem cells is limited. This review summarizes the molecular mechanisms of RNA methylation and the biological functions of RNA methylation in embryonic stem cells (ESCs), adult stem cells (ASCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), and CSCs, with a focus on m⁶A.

2. RNA Methylation Modifications

RNA methylation modifications mainly include m⁶A, m⁵C, and U-tail, and their molecular mechanisms are summarized as follows.

m⁶A is one of the most abundant modifications in mRNA and lncRNA, which was first discovered in the 1970s [6, 7]. m⁶A accounts for approximately 0.1%–0.4% of adenosines and 50% of total methylated ribonucleotides in mammalian RNA [8]. The m⁶A modification is dynamically reversible and mainly occurs in RRACH (R represents A or G and H represents A, U, or C) sequences [8]. Three key factors are involved in m⁶A modification, including “writers,” “erasers,” and “readers.” “Writers” mediate the RNA methylation process, which is a methyltransferase complex composed of three core components: methyltransferase-like (METTL) 3, METTL14, and Wilms’ tumor 1-associating protein (WTAP) [9, 10]. In addition, zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13 (ZC3H13), RNA-binding motif 15 (RBM15), virilizer-like m⁶A methyltransferase associated (VIRMA), Cb1 protooncogene-like 1 (CBLL1), KIAA1429, and HAKAI are involved in RNA methylation as auxiliary elements [9–11]. METTL5 has recently been identified as an RNA methyltransferase, which catalyzes m⁶A in 18S rRNA [12]. “Erasers” mediate the demethylation of RNA. Fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO) and alkylated DNA repair protein alkB homolog 5 (ALKBH5) are two main demethylases currently known [9]. “Readers” are responsible for “reading” the information of RNA methylation modification and participating in the translation, degradation, and other processes of downstream RNA [13]. YT521-B homology domain-containing family (YTHDF) (including YTHDF1, YTHDF2, YTHDF3, YTHDC1, and YTHDC2), the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) family (HNRNPA2B1, HNRNPC, and HNRNPG), insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 1~3 (IGF2BP1~3), and eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (EIF3) are m⁶A binding proteins [13–15]. Although m⁶A may block nonstandard A:G base pairing and affect RNA structure, it does not alter the coding ability or base pairing of adenine with uracil or thymine [8]. In addition, the occurrence of m⁶A may affect the expression level, translation efficiency, nuclear retention, splicing, and stability of RNA [10, 14]. m⁶A is closely related to human obesity, cancer, and other diseases and participates in the regulation of circadian rhythm, cell meiosis, cell reprogramming, stem cell proliferation, and other biological processes [6, 8, 16, 17].

In addition to m⁶A, m⁵C is another methylated modification form widely present in RNA [18, 19]. It is a crucial regulator of RNA export, ribosome assembly, translation, RNA stability, and other crucial biological processes [20–24]. m⁵C methyltransferases mainly include tRNA methyltransferase 4 (TRM4), tRNA aspartic acid methyltransferase 1 (TRDMT1), and the NOL1/NOP2/SUN domain (NSUN) family [20, 21, 25, 26]. However, enzymes capable of reversing m⁵C methylation have not been found in RNA. Although the demethylation of RNA m⁵C may be catalyzed by Tet, further verification is required [27]. ALYREF and Y-box binding protein 1 (YBX1) act as readers to specifically recognize m⁵C modification [28, 29].

U-tail, first identified in the 1970s [2], can promote the degradation of RNA, affect its processing, and change its pathway or activity [30–32]. U-tail “writers” are mainly terminal uridylyltransferases (TUTs) [2, 32, 33]. TUT4 (also known as ZCCHC11 and TENT3A) and TUT7 (ZCCHC6 or TENT3B) were identified as two important TUTases involved in mRNA degradation [32]. Whether deuridase as an “eraser” plays a regulatory role in the process of U-tail remains unclear. The exonuclease DIS3L2 and Lsm1-7 complex may be the “readers” or “effectors” for selective U-tail recognition [2]. U-tail, associated with many human diseases, such as cancer and cardiac myotonic dystrophy, plays a vital role in virus immune defense and early vertebrate development [2, 30, 33].

The discovery of RNA methyl modifiers and binding proteins and their involvement in the metabolic processing of RNA suggest that RNA methylation has crucial biological functions.

3. m⁶A and Embryonic Stem Cells

The dynamic regulation of m⁶A modification is essential for the pluripotency, self-renewal, and differentiation of ESCs (Table 1).

m⁶A is the most prevalent posttranscriptional modification of mRNA and is involved in mRNA stability, splicing, translation, and other biological processes [34]. Huang et al. demonstrated that m⁶A mRNA modifications are enriched near the peaks of histone H3 trimethylation at Lys36 (H3K36me3), which is a histone marker, and are reduced when H3K36me3 is depleted in mouse ESCs [35]. METTL14, a major component of the m⁶A methyltransferase complex, can recognize and bind to H3K36me3 and then promote the cotranscriptional deposition of m⁶A. In mouse ESCs, METTL14 knockdown and H3K36me3 loss significantly reduced m⁶A levels in transcriptome-wide and pluripotency transcripts, leading to increased cell stemness. H3K36me3 inhibits pluripotency and promotes the differentiation of mouse ESCs partially by regulating the m⁶A modifications of several key pluripotency genes, such as octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4), sex-determining region Y- (SRY-) box 2 (SOX2), and NANOG [35] (Figure 1). These results indicated that m⁶A RNA methylation and histone modification interact in the regulation of ESC pluripotency and differentiation. In addition, m⁶A was identified as a regulator for terminating naive pluripotency in mice to ensure timely pluripotent factor downregulation, which is necessary for proper lineage initiation and differentiation [36]. Loss of METTL3 in preimplantation epiblasts and naive ESCs leads to near complete depletion of m⁶A on mRNA. However, METTL3^−/− ESCs still retain their naive pluripotency. Abnormal and restricted lineage initiation subsequently occurs in the postimplantation phase and results in early embryonic lethality [36]. These results are the foundation for studying the role of m⁶A in other stem cell developmental transitions and exploring other potential m⁶A functions. Sun et al. reported that extracellular regulated protein kinases- (ERK-) dependent phosphorylation of METTL3 and WTAP promotes ESC differentiation [37]. Lack of METTL3/WTAP phosphorylation reduces decay of m⁶A-labeled pluripotent factor transcripts and traps mouse ESCs in the pluripotent state [37] (Figure 1). Another m⁶A methyltransferase METTL5 has recently been shown to be important for ESC pluripotency and differentiation. Ignatova et al. reported that the absence of METTL5 in mouse ESCs results in a decrease in global translation rate, spontaneous loss of pluripotency, and compromised differentiation potential [12]. Xing et al. also found that deletion of METTL5 causes a dramatic differentiation defect in mouse ESCs [38]. ZC3H13, a zinc finger protein, plays a vital role in regulating RNA m⁶A methylation in ESC nuclei. ZC3H13 works together with the WTAP–VIRILIZER–HAKAI complex to promote mRNA m⁶A processing [39]. ZC3H13 is necessary for the nuclear localization of WTAP, VIRILIZER, and HAKAI. ZC3H13 knockout in mouse ESCs remarkably reduced m⁶A levels, damaged self-renewal, and triggered differentiation [39]. The above studies suggested that these m⁶A methyltransferases play an important role in ESC differentiation and pluripotency through different regulatory mechanisms.

The RNA demethylase FTO is typically phosphorylated by glycogen synthase kinase- (GSK-) 3 and leads to polyubiquitination, which is impaired in GSK-3-knockout ESCs, resulting in increased FTO protein levels [40] (Figure 1). The m⁶A levels of pluripotency-related mRNAs Esrrb and c-Myc decreased because of the alteration of FTO protein levels [40]. The study indicated that FTO and GSK-3 interactions are involved in the regulation of stem cell pluripotency.

The YTHDF proteins have recently been proposed to perform different cellular functions. Wang et al. reported that depletion of YTHDF3 in ESCs resulted in the loss of pluripotency with accelerated expressions of marker genes involved in the formation of three germ layers [41]. Liu et al. showed that knockout of METTL3 or YTHDC1 in mouse ESCs increases chromatin accessibility and activates transcription in an m⁶A-dependent manner [42]. Lasman et al. systematically knocked out (KO) each of the YTHDF1/2/3 readers and the three readers together (triple-KO) to analyze the effect in vitro in mouse ESCs and found that only triple-KO ESCs are not able to differentiate properly and present a prolonged mRNA half-life while no significant effect is seen in the single-KOs [43]. This suggested that there is compensation between the three YTHDF reader proteins in mouse ESCs.

Similar to the role of m⁶A mRNA modification on the fate of ESCs, m⁶A on lncRNA also affects ESC pluripotency and differentiation. Yang et al. reported that linc1281 deletion affects the differentiation of mouse ESCs, but linc1281 was not necessary for the self-renewal of mouse ESCs [44]. The m⁶A modification is significantly enriched in linc1281 transcripts. linc1281 containing the RRACU m⁶A sequence motifs could restore the differentiation capacity in linc1281-deficient mouse ESCs [44]. Mechanistically, linc1281 regulates mouse ESC pluripotency and differentiation by sequestering relevant let-7 miRNAs, which depend on m⁶A [44].

4. m⁶A and Adult Stem Cells

Many studies have reported the crucial biological functions of m⁶A modification in different ASCs. Here, we summarize the research results of m⁶A modification in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), neural stem cells (NSCs), and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) (Table 1).

4.1. m⁶A and HSCs

HSCs are derived from ESCs and have high self-renewal and multiple differentiation capabilities [45]. HSCs develop into mature blood cells according to certain rules under the influence of various regulatory factors in the hematopoietic microenvironment [45]. The m⁶A modification plays a key role in hematopoietic development during vertebrate embryogenesis [46].

METTL3 is a key component of the m⁶A methyltransferase complex. METTL3 deletion promotes cell differentiation and reduces cell proliferation in human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) [47]. By contrast, wild-type METTL3 overexpression inhibits cell differentiation and promotes cell growth in vitro [47]. Notably, Lee et al. reported opposite results: the conditional deletion of METTL3 in the adult hematopoietic system resulted in HSC accumulation in bone marrow, and the blockade of HSC differentiation led to a significant reduction of reconstitution potential both in vivo and in vitro [48]. However, the number and function of myeloid cells were not affected by METTL3 deletion. The authors identified m⁶A targets in HSCs through RNA sequencing and found notable enrichment of 2073 genes related to hematopoietic differentiation, and the m⁶A modification of these genes was dependent on METTL3 [48]. In addition, MYC was identified as a major functional target of m⁶A in HSCs. Further validating the difference between the two studies warrants further research, and the role of m⁶A in HSCs and progenitor cells may require individual identification. Cheng et al. uncovered that m⁶A is essential for the maintenance of HSC identity and symmetric commitment, with normal asymmetric commitment upon METTL3 depletion [49]. Gao et al. showed that loss of METTL3 resulted in defective fetal hematopoietic progenitor proliferation, lineage commitment, and maturation, with accumulation of immature HSPCs and resultant hematopoietic failure [50]. Zhang et al. also revealed the crucial role of m⁶A modification in the fate of HSPCs during vertebrate embryogenesis. The authors found that m⁶A peaks are obviously enriched in RRACH motifs in zebrafish, and this result is consistent with studies in mammals [51]. In METTL3-deficient embryos, delayed YTHDF2-mediated mRNA decay of the arterial endothelial genes notch1a and rhoca resulted in a significant decrease of m⁶A levels and blockade of HSPCs [51] (Figure 2). Because the continual activation of Notch signaling in arterial endothelial cells of METTL3-deficient embryos blocked the endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition, the production of the earliest HSPCs was inhibited [51]. These findings indicated that METTL3 may be a central regulator of HSPC fate.

Li et al. confirmed the role of m⁶A reader protein YTHDF2 in the maintenance of ASCs [52]. The authors demonstrated that YTHDF2 plays a crucial role in regulating the expansion of HSCs in vivo by modulating the stability of various mRNAs essential for HSC self-renewal [52].

METTL14, another major m⁶A methyltransferase, is highly expressed in normal HSPCs and reduced during myeloid differentiation. Inhibition of METTL14 promotes terminal myeloid differentiation of normal HSPCs [53].

Collectively, these results clarify the profound effects of m⁶A in the process of hematopoiesis. METTL3, METTL14, and YTHDF2 may serve as key targets for m⁶A to regulate HSC self-renewal and differentiation in clinical research.

4.2. m⁶A and NSCs

m⁶A is critical in regulating neuronal development and adult neurogenesis [54]. Loss of METTL3 considerably reduces m⁶A levels in adult NSCs (aNSCs) and inhibited the proliferation of aNSCs without affecting their homogeneity [55]. METTL3 deficiency not only inhibits the development of neurons but also makes the differentiation of aNSCs more inclined toward glial lineage; the morphological maturation of new neurons in the adult brain is also affected [55]. METTL3-mediated m⁶A modification regulates histone methyltransferase Ezh2 expression at the translational level. Ezh2 overexpression could alter neuronal development and neurogenesis defects caused by METTL3 deficiency [55]. In addition, METTL3 may contribute to spinal cord regeneration. Xing et al. showed a conserved feature of METTL3 changes in a mouse spinal cord injury model, in which the expression of METTL3 is increased in NSCs [56]. Another m⁶A methyltransferase METTL14 is required for NSC proliferation and maintains NSCs in an undifferentiated state. METTL14 knockout decreases NSC proliferation and promotes premature NSC differentiation, which suggests that m⁶A is necessary for NSC self-renewal [57].

Similarly, m⁶A demethylase FTO is key in neurodevelopment and neurogenesis. FTO is strongly expressed in neurons and aNSCs and dynamically expressed during postnatal neurodevelopment [58]. FTO deletion results in reduced brain size and body weight. The lack of FTO can inhibit the proliferation and neuronal differentiation of aNSCs in vivo, leading to learning and memory impairment in mice [58]. Cao et al. showed that FTO deficiency in aNSCs transiently increases the proliferation of aNSCs and promotes neuronal differentiation, but in a long term, FTO deficiency inhibits adult neurogenesis and neuronal development through modulating the Pdgfra/Socs5-Stat3 pathway [59] (Figure 2).

The deletion of the m⁶A reader protein YTHDF2 in the embryonic neocortex seriously affects the self-renewal of neural stem and progenitor cells (NSPCs) and the spatiotemporal generation of neurons and other cell types [60]. NSPC proliferation and differentiation ability were significantly reduced in YTHDF2^−/− embryos in both in vivo and in vitro experiments [60]. YTHDF2^−/− neurons cannot produce normal functional neurites, and expression of genes rich in neural development pathways is remarkably interfered [60]. Increased levels of m⁶A modified transcripts are caused by delayed degradation of mRNAs in YTHDF2^−/− NSPCs, which may result in neurogenesis defects [60].

Taken together, the writers, erasers, and readers of m⁶A modification all participate in the development of the nervous system and have crucial effects on neurogenesis.

4.3. m⁶A and BMSCs

BMSCs have multidirectional differentiation potential, can support hematopoiesis, promote HSC implantation, participate in key biological processes such as tissue regeneration and immune privilege, and have broad application prospects in stem cell therapy and regenerative medicine [61]. The m⁶A modification is involved in the development and differentiation of BMSCs. The expression of m⁶A methyltransferase METTL3 is significantly upregulated in the adipogenic process of porcine BMSCs (pBMSCs) [62]. A lack of METTL3 in pBMSCs can promote adipose formation and mediate Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) expression in an m⁶A–YTHDF2-dependent manner [62]. METTL3 deficiency reduces the m⁶A levels of JAK1, thus enhancing the stability of YTHDF2-dependent JAK1 mRNA. JAK1 affects adipogenesis by regulating STAT5 expression and activity. STAT5 can directly bind to the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) β promoter to regulate its activity and mediate JAK1-regulated adipogenic gene expression and thus affect adipogenesis [62] (Figure 2). This study provides a new perspective for the potential molecular mechanism of m⁶A modification in regulating BMSC differentiation into adipocytes and may provide crucial reference values in stem cell regenerative medicine and obesity treatment.

Moreover, METTL3 deficiency in BMSCs may lead to bone impairment, insufficient osteogenic differentiation ability, and increased adipogenic potential. Yu identified METTL3 as a crucial regulator in the progression of osteogenic differentiation [63]. METTL3 is highly expressed in osteogenically differentiated BMSCs [64]. Loss of METTL3 suppressed the osteogenic differentiation potential of BMSCs [64]. Yan et al. reported that METTL3-induced m⁶A methylation of RNAs promotes osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs through m⁶A-based posttranscriptional regulation of runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) [65]. Silence of METTL3 by short interfering RNA (siRNA) decreased m⁶A methylation levels and inhibited osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs and reduced bone mass [65]. In addition, METTL3 overexpression in BMSCs can prevent osteoporosis caused by estrogen deficiency in mice [66]. In terms of mechanisms, the parathyroid hormone (PTH)/parathyroid hormone receptor-1 (PTH1R) signal axis is a pivotal m⁶A downstream pathway in BMSCs [66]. METTL3 conditional knockout reduces the translation efficiency of PTH1R in BMSCs and interferes with PTH-induced osteogenic and adipogenic effects in vivo [66] (Figure 2). These results provide new insights into the key regulatory role of m⁶A in bone health and disease as well as new evidence for the regulation of stem cell differentiation by m⁶A.

The demethylase activity of FTO is required for MSC differentiation. Wang et al. demonstrated that exposure of MSCs to TNF-α is sufficient to repress FTO expression, leading to increased Nanog mRNA methylation, decreased Nanog mRNA expression, and reduced differentiation potential of MSCs [67].

5. m⁶A and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

iPSCs were originally obtained by using viral vectors to transfer four transcription factors, OCT4, SOX2, Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4), and c-Myc, into differentiated somatic cells and reprogramming them. iPSCs have broad application prospects in the treatment of human diseases and organ transplantation [68]. Because of their similarity to and physiological characteristics in the human genome, porcine iPSCs (piPSCs) have become an ideal alternative research model to human ESCs (hESCs). The m⁶A modification plays a major role in mediating the pluripotency of piPSCs. METTL3 deletion remarkably affects cell self-renewal and pluripotency in piPSCs. METTL3 controls the STAT3–KLF4–SOX2 signal pathway by mediating JAK2 and SOSC3 expression in a YTHDF1/YTHDF2-orchestrated manner to regulate piPSC pluripotency [69] (Figure 3, Table 1).

Bertero et al. reported that the intracellular effectors SMAD2 and SMAD3 (SMAD2/3) interact with the METTL3–METTL14–WTAP complex in an Activin/Nodal signal-dependent manner in both hESCs and human iPSCs (hiPSCs) [70] (Figures 1 and 3, Table 1). The interaction could promote m⁶A deposition on transcript subsets participating in early cell fate determination. The resulting negative feedback makes these transcripts unstable and leads to rapid degradation after inhibiting the Activin/Nodal signal [70]. The mechanism facilitates timely withdrawal of pluripotency and induces neuroectodermal differentiation.

The m⁶A reader proteins YTHDF2 and YTHDF3 are required for reprogramming somatic cells into iPSCs [71]. YTHDF2 is highly expressed in iPSCs and downregulated during neural differentiation [72]. Depletion of YTHDF2 in iPSCs leads to stabilization of a group of m⁶A-modified transcripts associated with neural development, loss of pluripotency, and induction of neural-specific gene expression [72] (Table 1).

6. m⁶A and CSCs

CSCs are a small subset of various tumor types that have the dual characteristics of self-renewal and differentiation and are crucial in tumor occurrence and development. CSCs are resistant to most treatments and are therefore related to cancer recurrence [73]. Therefore, developing a more effective treatment necessitates further exploration of the molecular mechanism of CSC regulation.

6.1. m⁶A and LSCs

Compared with healthy HSPCs or other types of cancer cells, m⁶A methyltransferase METTL3 is more abundant in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells. In addition, METTL3 loss in human myeloid leukemia cell lines can lead to cell differentiation and apoptosis and hinder the progress of leukemia in recipient mice in vivo. m⁶A can promote the translation of c-Myc, Bcl-2, and PTEN mRNAs in the human AML MOLM-13 cell line [47]. Barbieri et al. also demonstrated that METTL3 is a crucial gene for AML cell growth [74]. In immunodeficient mice, downregulation of METTL3 leads to cell-cycle arrest, leukemia cell differentiation, and leukemia establishment failure. METTL3 is related to chromatin and is located at the transcriptional initiation sites of active genes. Moreover, most of these genes have the CAATT-box binding protein CEBPZ at the transcription initiation site, which is necessary for METTL3 to be recruited into chromatin [74]. Promoter-bound METTL3 induces m⁶A modification in the coding region of relevant mRNA transcripts and improves its translation efficiency by mitigating ribosome stagnation [74]. These results suggest that METTL3 may be a potential target for myeloid malignancy treatment.

METTL14, another m⁶A methyltransferase, is strongly expressed in AML cells carrying t(11q23), t(15;17), or t(8;21) and is reduced during myeloid differentiation [53]. METTL14 inhibition promotes terminal myeloid differentiation of AML cells and inhibits AML cell survival and proliferation. METTL14 is essential for the development and maintenance of AML and self-renewal of leukemia stem initiation cells (LSCs or LICs) [53]. METTL14 plays a carcinogenic role by regulating its key targets, such as MYB and MYC, through m⁶A modification.

The demethylase ALKBH5 plays critical roles in leukemic cell transformation, AML development and maintenance, and LSC/LIC self-renewal through posttranscriptional regulation of critical targets via m⁶A-dependent mechanisms [75]. Shen et al. demonstrated that targeting ALKBH5 effectively inhibits AML development/maintenance and suppresses LSC self-renewal while sparing normal hematopoiesis [75]. Wang et al. showed that ALKBH5 is required for maintaining LSC function but is dispensable for normal hematopoiesis and reveal KDM4C-ALKBH5-AXL signaling axis in AML development and maintenance [76] (Figure 4). These findings suggest a potential therapeutic strategy for selectively treating AML by targeting ALKBH5.

The m⁶A reader protein YTHDF2 has been shown to be overexpressed in a broad spectrum of human AML [77]. YTHDF2 is essential for disease initiation and reproduction in mouse and human AML. YTHDF2 can reduce the half-life of m⁶A transcripts, which are crucial for the overall integrity of LSC function [77]. Notably, the authors found that YTHDF2 is not required for normal HSC function and that YTHDF2 deletion may increase HSC activity [77].

6.2. m⁶A and CRC CSCs

One study revealed the basic functions of m⁶A in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and demonstrated the carcinogenic effects of METTL3 in promoting stemness and metastasis of CRC. Colorectal cancer stem-like cells are a cancer cell type with self-renewal and multiple differentiation potential and have strong tumorigenicity and metastasis abilities. METTL3 inhibition could enhance chemotherapy response and reduce CSCs in CRC [78]. METTL3 maintains the expression of the CSC marker SRY-box 2 (SOX2) through the m⁶A–IGF2BP2-dependent regulatory mechanism in CRC cells and then promotes CRC stemness and metastasis [78] (Figure 4). In addition, METTL3 inhibition could reduce the surface antigen expression of colorectal CSCs. Overall, these results highlight the critical role of METTL3 in CRC, indicating that METTL3 may be a CSC marker for CRC diagnosis and treatment.

The m⁶A reader protein YTHDF1 is involved in tumorigenesis. YTHDF1 knockdown considerably inhibited the tumorigenicity of CRC cells in vitro and the growth of mouse xenograft tumors in vivo [79]. YTHDF1 silencing reduced the number of colonospheres, downregulated CRC CSC marker expression, and inhibited Wnt/β-catenin pathway activity by interacting with FZD9 and Wnt6 mRNA in CRC cells [79] (Figure 4). These results indicate that YTHDF1 is key in tumorigenicity and stem cell-like activity in CRC cells and may provide a new potential target for the clinical treatment of CRC.

6.3. m⁶A and GSCs

The m⁶A mRNA modification plays a key role in glioblastoma stem cell (GSC) self-renewal and tumorigenesis. Visvanathan et al. reported that METTL3-mediated m⁶A modification plays a key role in GSC maintenance and glioma cell dedifferentiation [80]. METTL3 expression is elevated in GSC and attenuated during differentiation. The METTL3-dependent GSC maintenance is mediated by SOX2 mRNA stabilization, and human antigen R (HuR) recruitment to m⁶A-modified sites is required for SOX2 mRNA stabilization [80] (Figure 4). METTL3-silenced GSCs exhibited increased sensitivity to γ-irradiation and decreased DNA repair. Exogenous overexpression of 3UTR-less SOX2 exhibited potent DNA repair in METTL3-silenced GSCs [80]. In addition, METTL3 is essential for the expression of GSC-specific actively transcribed genes [81]. The integrated analysis of the m⁶A regulome in METTL3-silenced GSCs showed global disruption in tumorigenic pathways that are indispensable for GSC maintenance and glioma progression [81]. Li et al. identified METTL3 as a modulator of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay to sustain malignancy in glioblastoma (GBM) [82]. Silencing METTL3 or overexpressing dominant-negative mutant METTL3 suppressed the growth and self-renewal of GSCs [82]. These data suggest that METTL3 may be a molecular target for clinical GBM treatment. Moreover, METTL3 or METTL14 deletion can significantly enhance GSC growth, self-renewal, and tumor progression [83]. By contrast, METTL3 overexpression or FTO suppression can inhibit GSC growth and self-renewal. In addition, FTO inhibition can suppress tumor progression and prolong the lifespan of GSC-transplanted mice [83]. Further analysis demonstrated that m⁶A modification participates in regulating the expression of genes with crucial biological functions in GSCs, which may be a target for GBM treatment.

The levels of m⁶A demethylase ALKBH5 are high in GSCs. ALKBH5 is necessary for GSC self-renewal, and increased ALKBH5 expression typically indicates a poor prognosis in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), whereas ALKBH5 deletion can inhibit GSC proliferation and tumorigenesis [84]. Kowalski-Chauvel et al. demonstrated that targeting ALKBH5 increases radiosensitization of GSCs by controlling the homologous repair and represses their invasion capability [85]. These data suggested that ALKBH5 is an attractive therapeutic target to overcome radioresistance and invasiveness of GSCs. Huff et al. showed that FTO inhibitor FTO-04 can impair the self-renewal properties of GSCs to prevent neurosphere formation without significantly altering the growth of human NSC neurospheres [86].

Yarmishyn et al. demonstrated that YTHDF1 is involved in Musashi-1-mediated GBM tumorigenesis processes such as cell proliferation and migration and also regulates the stem-like properties of GBM cells [87]. YTHDF2 was identified as a GSC-specific dependency that regulates glucose metabolism in GSCs through stabilization of MYC transcripts [88].

6.4. m⁶A and BCSCs

The breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) are the crucial factors for the occurrence, growth, metastasis, and recurrence of breast cancer [89]. BCSC phenotype is specified and maintained by the expression of octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4), Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4), SRY-box 2 (SOX2), and NANOG [90]. Hypoxia can promote BCSC enrichment in breast cancer cells, which depends on the activity of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) [90]. Knockout of ZNF217 or ALKBH5 gene can increase m⁶A RNA methylation and decrease the levels of NANOG and KLF4 under hypoxic conditions [91]. The expressions of hypoxia-induced pluripotent factors and ALKBH5 or ZNF217 in breast cancer cell lines are dependent on HIF. The expression of HIF-1α and ALKBH5 were consistent in human breast cancer biopsies analyzed. Knockout of ALKBH5 in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells remarkably reduced breast-to-lung metastasis in immunodeficient mice [91] (Figure 4). This study suggests that m⁶A demethylase ALKBH5 and m⁶A methyltransferase inhibitor ZNF217 have important effects on BCSC phenotype and breast cancer metastasis. Zhu et al. reported that hypoxia-induced lncRNA KB-1980E6.3 is involved in the self-renewal and stemness maintenance of BCSCs by recruiting IGF2BP1 to regulate c-Myc mRNA stability. The lncRNA KB-1980E6.3/IGF2BP1/c-Myc axis may potentially be a therapeutic target for breast cancer [92] (Figure 4).

Overall, these results indicate that m⁶A modification has an important influence on the occurrence and development of various cancers and may be a potential target for cancer treatment (Table 1).

7. m⁵C and Stem Cells

m⁵C is another crucial posttranscriptional RNA modification. However, studies related to this modification and stem cell biology are limited.

An unbiased global analysis of total RNA and nuclear poly(A) RNA m⁵C in mouse ESCs and mouse brains indicated that m⁵C loci accumulated considerably near the codon of translation initiation, depleted from the m⁶A peak region of the translation stop codon, and increased at different locations in 3UTRs in different transcript classes [93]. This study provides a comprehensive map of cytosine methylation in the transcriptome of murine pluripotent and differentiation stages and provides crucial reference values for future studies of the biological function of m⁵C in mammalian RNA. The RNA m⁵C methyltransferase NSUN3 regulates ESC differentiation by affecting mitochondrial activity. NSUN3 mutant cells exhibited significant reductions in mt-tRNA^Met methylation and formylation as well as mitochondrial translation and respiration [94]. Although the proliferation of NSUN3 mutant cells decreased, pluripotency marker gene expression was not affected [94]. ESC differentiation had a tendency toward mesoderm and endoderm lineages at the expense of neuroectoderm [94]. Thus, these findings demonstrate that m⁵C RNA modification plays a crucial role in regulating ESC fate and function (Table 1).

m⁵C RNA methylation is involved in the regulation of NSC differentiation and motility. The m⁵C methyltransferase NSUN2 is expressed in neuroepithelial stem and progenitor cells during early human brain development, and its expression gradually decreases during neural differentiation [95]. Deletion of NSUN2-mediated tRNA methylation increases their endonucleolytic cleavage by angiogenin, resulting in the enrichment of 5-derived tRNA fragments in NSUN2−/− brains [95]. NSUN2 depletion inhibits the migration of neural cells to chemical attractant fibroblast growth factor 2, leading to impaired neural differentiation of neuroepithelial stem cells [95] (Table 1). These findings indicate that m⁵C RNA methylation has crucial effects on neural development, and its role in other stem cells requires further exploration and research.

8. U-Tail and Stem Cells

U-tail is closely related to stem cell differentiation and cancer (Table 1). Zcchc11 (TUT4) was identified as the 3 TUTase responsible for Lin28-mediated pre–let-7 U-tail and blockade of let-7 processing in mouse ESCs [96]. Zcchc6 (TUT7) was also identified as an alternative TUTase that functions with Lin28 in vitro [97]. Zcchc11 and Zcchc6 redundantly control let-7 biogenesis in ESCs [97]. These results provide insight into the mechanism of Lin28-mediated TUTase control of let-7 expression in stem cells and cancer. In addition, Takahashi et al. reported that TUT7 is involved in the neural differentiation of primed pluripotent stem cells via the regulation of human endogenous retrovirus accumulation [98].

DIS3L2 is a 3–5 exonuclease responsible for the decay of uridylated let-7 precursor in mouse ESCs [99, 100]. Pirouz et al. showed that DIS3L2 is required for normal ESC differentiation [101]. DIS3L2 deficiency resulted in the formation of larger embryoid bodies during spontaneous ESC differentiation [101]. Liu et al. found that an lncRNA (AC105461.1), a promoter upstream transcript of DIS3L2, may be a mediator of CRC stem cells [102]. The expression of AC105461.1 was positively correlated with that of DIS3L2 in CRC [102]. AC105461.1 overexpression impaired the CSC properties while knockdown enhanced the CSC properties, including self-renewal, migration, and invasion abilities [102]. The role of U-tail in various stem cells cannot be ignored, and it is worth more exploration in the future.

9. Conclusions and Perspectives

RNA methylation, as a vital posttranscriptional mechanism of gene regulation, is crucial to physiological and pathological processes. As high-throughput sequencing technology is rapidly developing, the understanding of the biological functions of RNA methylation is deepening.

Numerous studies demonstrated a close correlation between RNA methylation and stem cells. RNA methylation plays a key role in regulating stem cell maintenance, differentiation, reprogramming, and controlling in mammalian developmental stages. The regulatory factors of RNA methylation are involved in regulating stem cell fate and function. These findings have opened new directions for the clinical treatment of various diseases, including cancer. The aberrant expression of one or more RNA methylation regulatory factors may be used as a diagnostic or prognostic biomarker. Further in-depth analysis of RNA methylation may aid in developing inhibitors targeting writers, erasers, or readers to further explore the potential mechanisms for controlling gene expression in stem cells in physiology and pathology. However, many obstacles remain that must be overcome when treating diseases by targeting RNA methylation. In addition, although RNA methylation involves many patterns, research on RNA methylation patterns in addition to m⁶A in stem cells is limited and may require further exploration and research as well as more advanced molecular biology techniques to make breakthroughs.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Jining Municipal Science and Technology Development Project (grant number 2016-56-82) and Scientific Research Support Fund for Young Teachers of Jining Medical University (grant number JY2016KJ022Y).

References

V. Haran and N. Lenka, “Deciphering the epitranscriptomic signatures in cell fate determination and development,” Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 474–496, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Lee, B. Kim, and V. N. Kim, “Emerging roles of RNA modification: m⁶A and U-tail,” Cell, vol. 158, no. 5, pp. 980–987, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Shyh-Chang and H. H. Ng, “The metabolic programming of stem cells,” Genes & Development, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 336–346, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Dulak, K. Szade, A. Szade, W. Nowak, and A. Jozkowicz, “Adult stem cells: hopes and hypes of regenerative medicine,” Acta Biochimica Polonica, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 329–337, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Morena, C. Argentati, M. Bazzucchi, C. Emiliani, and S. Martino, “Above the epitranscriptome: RNA modifications and stem cell identity,” Genes, vol. 9, no. 7, p. 329, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Hastings, “m⁶A mRNA methylation: a new circadian pacesetter,” Cell, vol. 155, no. 4, pp. 740-741, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Pan, “_N_ 6-methyl-adenosine modification in messenger and long non-coding RNA,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 204–209, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Chen, Y. J. Hao, Y. Zhang et al., “m⁶A RNA methylation is regulated by microRNAs and promotes reprogramming to pluripotency,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 289–301, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Natalia, S. Stephanie, and J.-L. W. Justin, “Aberrant expression of enzymes regulating m⁶A mRNA methylation: implication in cancer,” Cancer Biology & Medicine, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 323–334, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Knuckles and M. Buhler, “Adenosine methylation as a molecular imprint defining the fate of RNA,” FEBS Letters, vol. 592, no. 17, pp. 2845–2859, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Vissers, A. Sinha, and H. Song, “The epitranscriptome in stem cell biology and neural development,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 146, article 105139, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. V. Ignatova, P. Stolz, S. Kaiser et al., “The rRNA m⁶A methyltransferase METTL5 is involved in pluripotency and developmental programs,” Genes & Development, vol. 34, no. 9-10, pp. 715–729, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Wang, C. Sun, J. Li et al., “Roles of RNA methylation by means of N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) in human cancers,” Cancer Letters, vol. 408, pp. 112–120, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Dai, H. Wang, L. Zhu, H. Jin, and X. Wang, “N6-methyladenosine links RNA metabolism to cancer progression,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 124, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Huang, H. Weng, W. Sun et al., “Recognition of RNA _N_ ⁶-methyladenosine by IGF2BP proteins enhances mRNA stability and translation,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 285–295, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Chen, Y. Li, R. Song, C. Xue, and F. Xu, “Functions of RNA N6-methyladenosine modification in cancer progression,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1383–1391, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chen, C. Wang, W. Fei, X. Fang, and X. Hu, “Epitranscriptomic m6A modification in the stem cell field and its effects on cell death and survival,” American Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 752–764, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Edelheit, S. Schwartz, M. R. Mumbach, O. Wurtzel, and R. Sorek, “Transcriptome-wide mapping of 5-methylcytidine RNA modifications in bacteria, archaea, and yeast reveals m5C within archaeal mRNAs,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 9, no. 6, article e1003602, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Trixl and A. Lusser, “The dynamic RNA modification 5-methylcytosine and its emerging role as an epitranscriptomic mark,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews RNA, vol. 10, no. 1, article e1510, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Cui, Z. Liang, L. Shen et al., “5-Methylcytosine RNA methylation in _Arabidopsis thaliana_,” Molecular Plant, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1387–1399, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. E. Squires, H. R. Patel, M. Nousch et al., “Widespread occurrence of 5-methylcytosine in human coding and non-coding RNA,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 5023–5033, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Sun, S. Xue, H. Xu et al., “Effects of NSUN2 deficiency on the mRNA 5-methylcytosine modification and gene expression profile in HEK293 cells,” Epigenomics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 439–453, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Dominissini and G. Rechavi, “5-Methylcytosine mediates nuclear export of mRNA,” Cell Research, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 717–719, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Li, X. Li, H. Tang et al., “NSUN2-mediated m5C methylation and METTL3/METTL14-mediated m6A methylation cooperatively enhance p21 translation,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 118, no. 9, pp. 2587–2598, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Bohnsack, C. Höbartner, and M. Bohnsack, “Eukaryotic 5-methylcytosine (m⁵C) RNA methyltransferases: mechanisms, cellular functions, and links to disease,” Genes, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 102, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. David, A. Burgess, B. Parker et al., “Transcriptome-wide mapping of RNA 5-methylcytosine in Arabidopsis mRNAs and noncoding RNAs,” The Plant Cell, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 445–460, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Shen, C.-X. Song, C. He, and Y. Zhang, “Mechanism and function of oxidative reversal of DNA and RNA methylation,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 585–614, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Yang, Y. Yang, B.-F. Sun et al., “5-methylcytosine promotes mRNA export -- NSUN2 as the methyltransferase and ALYREF as an m⁵C reader,” Cell Research, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 606–625, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yang, L. Wang, X. Han et al., “RNA 5-methylcytosine facilitates the maternal-to-zygotic transition by preventing maternal mRNA decay,” Molecular Cell, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 1188–202.e11, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yeo and V. N. Kim, “U-tail as a guardian against invading RNAs,” Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 903–905, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Kim, M. Ha, L. Loeff et al., “TUT7 controls the fate of precursor microRNAs by using three different uridylation mechanisms,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 34, no. 13, pp. 1801–1815, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Lim, M. Ha, H. Chang et al., “Uridylation by TUT4 and TUT7 marks mRNA for degradation,” Cell, vol. 159, no. 6, pp. 1365–1376, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Chang, J. Yeo, J.-G. Kim et al., “Terminal uridylyltransferases execute programmed clearance of maternal transcriptome in vertebrate embryos,” Molecular Cell, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 72–82.e7, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Hong, “Emerging function of N6-methyladenosine in cancer (review),” Oncology Letters, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 5519–5524, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Huang, H. Weng, K. Zhou et al., “Histone H3 trimethylation at lysine 36 guides m⁶A RNA modification co-transcriptionally,” Nature, vol. 567, no. 7748, pp. 414–419, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Geula, S. Moshitch-Moshkovitz, D. Dominissini et al., “m6A mRNA methylation facilitates resolution of naïve pluripotency toward differentiation,” Science, vol. 347, no. 6225, pp. 1002–1006, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-L. Sun, A. C. Zhu, Y. Gao et al., “Stabilization of ERK-phosphorylated METTL3 by USP5 increases m⁶A methylation,” Molecular Cell, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 633–647.e7, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Xing, Q. Liu, C. Mao et al., “The 18SrRNAm6A methyltransferaseMETTL5 promotes mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation,” EMBO Reports, vol. 21, no. 10, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wen, R. Lv, H. Ma et al., “Zc3h13 regulates nuclear RNA m⁶A methylation and mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal,” Molecular Cell, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 1028–1038.e6, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. Faulds, J. N. Egelston, L. J. Sedivy et al., “Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) activity regulates mRNA methylation in mouse embryonic stem cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 293, no. 27, pp. 10731–10743, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Wang, J. Zhang, X. Wu, X. Lin, X.-M. Liu, and J. Zhou, “Differential roles of YTHDF1 and YTHDF3 in embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte differentiation,” RNA Biology, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1354–1363, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Liu, X. Dou, C. Chen et al., “N6-methyladenosine of chromosome-associated regulatory RNA regulates chromatin state and transcription,” Science, vol. 367, no. 6477, pp. 580–586, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Lasman, V. Krupalnik, S. Viukov et al., “Context-dependent functional compensation between Ythdf m<sup>6</sup>A reader proteins,” Genes & Development, vol. 34, no. 19-20, pp. 1373–1391, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Yang, J. Qiao, G. Wang et al., “N6-Methyladenosine modification of lincRNA 1281 is critically required for mESC differentiation potential,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 3906–3920, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Kasper and S. Nicoli, “Epigenetic and epitranscriptomic factors make a mark on hematopoietic stem cell development,” Current Stem Cell Reports, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 22–32, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. P. Vu, Y. Cheng, and M. G. Kharas, “The biology of m⁶A RNA methylation in normal and malignant hematopoiesis,” Cancer Discovery, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. P. Vu, B. F. Pickering, Y. Cheng et al., “The N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A)-forming enzyme METTL3 controls myeloid differentiation of normal hematopoietic and leukemia cells,” Nature Medicine, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1369–1376, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Lee, S. Bao, Y. Qian et al., “Stage-specific requirement for Mettl3 -dependent m⁶A mRNA methylation during haematopoietic stem cell differentiation,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 700–709, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Cheng, H. Luo, F. Izzo et al., “m⁶A RNA methylation maintains hematopoietic stem cell identity and symmetric commitment,” Cell Reports, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1703–1716.e6, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Gao, R. Vasic, Y. Song et al., “m⁶A modification prevents formation of endogenous double-stranded RNAs and deleterious innate immune responses during hematopoietic development,” Immunity, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1007–1021.e8, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Zhang, Y. Chen, B. Sun et al., “m⁶A modulates haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell specification,” Nature, vol. 549, no. 7671, pp. 273–276, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Li, P. Qian, W. Shao et al., “Suppression of m⁶A reader Ythdf2 promotes hematopoietic stem cell expansion,” Cell Research, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 904–917, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Weng, H. Huang, H. Wu et al., “METTL14 Inhibits Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Differentiation and Promotes Leukemogenesis via mRNA m⁶A Modification,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 191–205.e9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. Yoon, F. R. Ringeling, C. Vissers et al., “Temporal Control of Mammalian Cortical Neurogenesis by m⁶A Methylation,” Cell, vol. 171, no. 4, pp. 877–89.e17, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chen, Y. C. Zhang, C. Huang et al., “m⁶A regulates neurogenesis and neuronal development by modulating histone methyltransferase Ezh2,” Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 154–168, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Xing, Y. Cai, T. Yang et al., “Epitranscriptomic m6A regulation following spinal cord injury,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 843–857, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, Y. Li, M. Yue et al., “N⁶-Methyladenosine RNA modification regulates embryonic neural stem cell self-renewal through histone modifications,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 195–206, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Li, L. Zang, F. Zhang et al., “Fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) protein regulates adult neurogenesis,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 26, no. 13, pp. 2398–2411, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Cao, Y. Zhuang, J. Chen et al., “Dynamic effects of Fto in regulating the proliferation and differentiation of adult neural stem cells of mice,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 727–735, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Li, X. Zhao, W. Wang et al., “Ythdf2-mediated m⁶A mRNA clearance modulates neural development in mice,” Genome Biology, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 69, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Onodera, T. Teramura, T. Takehara, and K. Fukuda, “Transforming Growth Factor β-Activated kinase 1 regulates mesenchymal stem cell proliferation through stabilization of Yap1/Taz proteins,” Stem Cells, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1595–1605, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yao, Z. Bi, R. Wu et al., “METTL3 inhibits BMSC adipogenic differentiation by targeting the JAK1/STAT5/C/EBPβ pathway via an m⁶A-YTHDF2–dependent manner,” FASEB Journal: official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 7529–7544, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yu, L. Shen, Y. Liu et al., “The m6A methyltransferase METTL3 cooperates with demethylase ALKBH5 to regulate osteogenic differentiation through NF-κB signaling,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 463, no. 1-2, pp. 203–210, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Tian, Y. Huang, Q. Li, Z. Feng, and Q. Xu, “Mettl3 regulates osteogenic differentiation and alternative splicing of Vegfa in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, no. 3, p. 551, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Yan, Y. Yuan, M. He et al., “m⁶A methylation of precursor-miR-320/RUNX2 controls osteogenic potential of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells,” Molecular Therapy-Nucleic Acids, vol. 19, pp. 421–436, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wu, L. Xie, M. Wang et al., “Mettl3-mediated m⁶A RNA methylation regulates the fate of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and osteoporosis,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 4772, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, R. Wang, B. Yao et al., “TNF-α suppresses sweat gland differentiation of MSCs by reducing FTO-mediated m⁶A-demethylation of Nanog mRNA,” Science China Life Sciences, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 80–91, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Bindhya, C. Sidhanth, A. Shabna, S. Krishnapriya, M. Garg, and T. S. Ganesan, “Induced pluripotent stem cells: a new strategy to model human cancer,” The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology., vol. 107, pp. 62–68, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Wu, Y. Liu, Y. Zhao et al., “m⁶A methylation controls pluripotency of porcine induced pluripotent stem cells by targeting SOCS3/JAK2/STAT3 pathway in a YTHDF1/YTHDF2-orchestrated manner,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 171, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Bertero, S. Brown, P. Madrigal et al., “The SMAD2/3 interactome reveals that TGFβ controls m⁶A mRNA methylation in pluripotency,” Nature, vol. 555, no. 7695, pp. 256–259, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Liu, M. Gao, S. Xu et al., “YTHDF2/3 are required for somatic reprogramming through different RNA deadenylation pathways,” Cell Reports, vol. 32, no. 10, p. 108120, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Heck, J. Russo, J. Wilusz, E. O. Nishimura, and C. J. Wilusz, “YTHDF2 destabilizes m6A-modified neural-specific RNAs to restrain differentiation in induced pluripotent stem cells,” RNA, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 739–755, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. B. Toh, J. J. Lim, and E. K. Chow, “Epigenetics in cancer stem cells,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 29, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Barbieri, K. Tzelepis, L. Pandolfini et al., “Promoter-bound METTL3 maintains myeloid leukaemia by m⁶A-dependent translation control,” Nature, vol. 552, no. 7683, pp. 126–131, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Shen, Y. Sheng, A. C. Zhu et al., “RNA demethylase ALKBH5 selectively promotes tumorigenesis and cancer stem cell self-renewal in acute myeloid leukemia,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 64–80.e9, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wang, Y. Li, P. Wang et al., “Leukemogenic chromatin alterations promote AML leukemia stem cells via a KDM4C-ALKBH5-AXL signaling axis,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 81–97.e8, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Paris, M. Morgan, J. Campos et al., “Targeting the RNA m⁶A reader YTHDF2 selectively compromises cancer stem cells in acute myeloid leukemia,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 137–48.e6, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Li, P. S. Hu, Z. Zuo et al., “METTL3 facilitates tumor progression via an m⁶A-IGF2BP2-dependent mechanism in colorectal carcinoma,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 112, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Bai, C. Yang, R. Wu et al., “YTHDF1 regulates tumorigenicity and cancer stem cell-like activity in human colorectal carcinoma,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 9, p. 332, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Visvanathan, V. Patil, A. Arora et al., “Essential role of METTL3-mediated m⁶A modification in glioma stem-like cells maintenance and radioresistance,” Oncogene, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 522–533, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Visvanathan, V. Patil, S. Abdulla, J. Hoheisel, and K. Somasundaram, “N⁶-Methyladenosine landscape of glioma stem-like cells: METTL3 is essential for the expression of actively transcribed genes and sustenance of the oncogenic signaling,” Genes, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 141, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Li, Y. Yi, Y. Miao et al., “N⁶-Methyladenosine modulates nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in human glioblastoma,” Cancer Research, vol. 79, no. 22, pp. 5785–5798, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Cui, H. Shi, P. Ye et al., “m⁶A RNA methylation regulates the self-renewal and tumorigenesis of glioblastoma stem cells,” Cell Reports, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2622–2634, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zhang, B. S. Zhao, A. Zhou et al., “m⁶A Demethylase ALKBH5 Maintains Tumorigenicity of Glioblastoma Stem-like Cells by Sustaining FOXM1 Expression and Cell Proliferation Program,” Cancer Cell, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 591–606.e6, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kowalski-Chauvel, M. G. Lacore, F. Arnauduc et al., “The m6A RNA demethylase ALKBH5 promotes radioresistance and invasion capability of glioma stem cells,” Cancers, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 40, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Huff, S. K. Tiwari, G. M. Gonzalez, Y. Wang, and T. M. Rana, “m⁶A-RNA demethylase FTO inhibitors impair self-renewal in glioblastoma stem cells,” ACS Chemical Biology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 324–333, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Yarmishyn, Y. P. Yang, K. H. Lu et al., “Musashi-1 promotes cancer stem cell properties of glioblastoma cells via upregulation of YTHDF1,” Cancer Cell International, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 597, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Dixit, B. C. Prager, R. C. Gimple et al., “The RNA m6A reader YTHDF2 maintains oncogene expression and is a targetable dependency in glioblastoma stem cells,” Cancer Discovery, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 480–499, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhang, L. Xu, F. Zhang, and E. Vlashi, “Doxycycline inhibits the cancer stem cell phenotype and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer,” Cell Cycle, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 737–745, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Zhang, D. Samanta, H. Lu et al., “Hypoxia induces the breast cancer stem cell phenotype by HIF-dependent and ALKBH5-mediated m⁶A-demethylation of NANOG mRNA,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 113, no. 14, pp. E2047–E2056, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Zhang, W. I. Zhi, H. Lu et al., “Hypoxia-inducible factors regulate pluripotency factor expression by ZNF217- and ALKBH5-mediated modulation of RNA methylation in breast cancer cells,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, no. 40, pp. 64527–64542, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Zhu, F. He, Y. Hou et al., “A novel hypoxic long noncoding RNA KB-1980E6.3 maintains breast cancer stem cell stemness via interacting with IGF2BP1 to facilitate c-Myc mRNA stability,” Oncogene, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1609–1627, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Amort, D. Rieder, A. Wille et al., “Distinct 5-methylcytosine profiles in poly(A) RNA from mouse embryonic stem cells and brain,” Genome Biology, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 1, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Trixl, T. Amort, A. Wille et al., “RNA cytosine methyltransferase Nsun3 regulates embryonic stem cell differentiation by promoting mitochondrial activity,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS, vol. 75, no. 8, pp. 1483–1497, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. V. Flores, L. Cordero-Espinoza, F. Oeztuerk-Winder et al., “Cytosine-5 RNA methylation regulates neural stem cell differentiation and motility,” Stem Cell Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 112–124, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Hagan, E. Piskounova, and R. I. Gregory, “Lin28 recruits the TUTase Zcchc11 to inhibit let-7 maturation in mouse embryonic stem cells,” Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1021–1025, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. E. Thornton, H. M. Chang, E. Piskounova, and R. I. Gregory, “Lin28-mediated control of let-7 microRNA expression by alternative TUTases Zcchc11 (TUT4) and Zcchc6 (TUT7),” RNA, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1875–1885, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Takahashi, D. Jeong, S. Wang et al., “Critical roles of translation initiation and RNA uridylation in endogenous retroviral expression and neural differentiation in pluripotent stem cells,” Cell Reports, vol. 31, no. 9, p. 107715, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-M. Chang, R. Triboulet, J. E. Thornton, and R. I. Gregory, “A role for the Perlman syndrome exonuclease Dis3l2 in the Lin28-let-7 pathway,” Nature, vol. 497, no. 7448, pp. 244–248, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Ustianenko, D. Hrossova, D. Potesil et al., “Mammalian DIS3L2 exoribonuclease targets the uridylated precursors of let-7 miRNAs,” RNA, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1632–1638, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pirouz, C. H. Wang, Q. Liu et al., “The Perlman syndrome DIS3L2 exoribonuclease safeguards endoplasmic reticulum-targeted mRNA translation and calcium ion homeostasis,” Nature Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2619, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Liu, Q. Yu, J. Ma et al., “Knockdown of a DIS3L2 promoter upstream long noncoding RNA (AC105461.1) enhances colorectal cancer stem cell properties in vitro by down-regulating DIS3L2,” OncoTargets and Therapy, vol. Volume 10, pp. 2367–2376, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Weiwei Sun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

600

Downloads

695

Citations

Stem Cells International

The Role of RNA Methylation in Regulating Stem Cell Fate and Function-Focus on m6A

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. RNA Methylation Modifications

3. m6A and Embryonic Stem Cells

4. m6A and Adult Stem Cells

4.1. m6A and HSCs

4.2. m6A and NSCs

4.3. m6A and BMSCs

5. m6A and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

6. m6A and CSCs

6.1. m6A and LSCs

6.2. m6A and CRC CSCs

6.3. m6A and GSCs

6.4. m6A and BCSCs

7. m5C and Stem Cells