Primary Cilia: A Cellular Regulator of Articular Cartilage Degeneration

Zhou, Haiqi; Wu, Sha; Ling, Huixian; Zhang, Changjie; Kong, Ying

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2560441

Stem Cells International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Novel Biological and Stem Cell-Based Management of Osteoarthritis

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 2560441 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2560441

Primary Cilia: A Cellular Regulator of Articular Cartilage Degeneration

Haiqi Zhou,¹Sha Wu,¹Huixian Ling,¹Changjie Zhang,¹and Ying Kong¹

Academic Editor: Mark Slevin

Received30 Nov 2021

Revised29 Jan 2022

Accepted02 Sept 2022

Published23 Sept 2022

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease that can cause pain and disability in adults. The main pathological characteristic of OA is cartilage degeneration, which is caused by chondrocyte apoptosis, cartilage matrix degradation, and inflammatory factor destruction. The current treatment for patients with OA focuses on delaying its progression, such as oral anti-inflammatory analgesics or injection of sodium gluconate into the joint cavity. Primary cilia are an important structure involved in cellular signal transduction. Thus, they are very sensitive to mechanical and physicochemical stimuli. It is reported that the primary cilia may play an important role in the development of OA. Here, we review the correlation between the morphology (location, length, incidence, and orientation) of chondrocyte primary cilia and OA and summarize the relevant signaling pathways in chondrocytes that could regulate the OA process through primary cilia, including Hedgehog, Wnt, and inflammation-related signaling pathways. These data provide new ideas for OA treatment.

1. Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease that severely influences the quality of life and is characterized by joint pain, swelling, stiffness, and motor dysfunction [1]. According to the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, OA affects 7% of the global population, more than 500 million people worldwide, which is the 15th highest cause of years lived with disability (YLDs) worldwide and is responsible for 2% of the total global YLDs [2]. Its pathological features are dominated by cartilage degeneration associated with subchondral bone remodeling, osteophyte formation, and synovial inflammation, involving complex inflammatory, mechanical, and metabolic factors [3, 4]. However, the exact mechanism of the pathogenesis of OA is still poorly understood.

Chondrocyte, the sole cell type in articular cartilage, are essential to maintain the normal structure and integrity of cartilage matrix [5]. Nevertheless, due to its complex anisotropic structure and avascularity, the cartilage exhibits limited self-repairing capacity. Thus, chondrocytes may cause OA-like chondrogenic degeneration after apoptosis. Under normal physiological conditions, chondrocyte apoptosis is important to maintain the homeostasis of various tissues in the human body, as well as to regulate normal cartilage development, while excessive apoptosis in chondrocytes causes damage to the repair and reconstruction of articular cartilage, leading to further cartilage degeneration and aggravating OA progression [6].

The primary cilium is a singular, immobile organelle present in most cells. As early as 1967, it has been demonstrated that primary cilia also present on chondrocytes [7]. Primary cilia are considered to function as cellular sensory organelles that can respond to diverse mechanical, chemical, and biological stimuli and play a key regulatory role in multiple biological processes, including cell proliferation, maturation, differentiation, and secretion. Many receptors for a variety of important signaling pathways are expressed in the primary cilia, such as Hedgehog (Hh), Wnt, Notch, transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), G protein-coupled receptor, and calcium signaling pathways. Dysfunctions or genetic mutations of the primary cilium cause a number of human diseases, classified as ciliopathies [8], such as polycystic kidney diseases [9], retinitis pigmentosa [10], and Bardet–Biedl syndrome [11], which can also manifest as abnormal cartilage formation [12].

Currently, several reports have associated the pathogenesis of OA with the function of primary cilia. Although the underlying mechanisms have not been clearly defined, there is growing evidence that primary cilia play an important role in cartilage degeneration in OA. Therefore, this paper will discuss the following aspects: the basic structure and material transport of primary cilia, the morphology of chondrocyte primary cilia, and their related signaling regulation mechanisms. We hope that this literature review will provide a new idea for OA treatment.

2. The Structure of Primary Cilia

Primary cilia are a highly specialized cell structure that protrudes from the surface of the cell membrane [13]. Each cell has only one cilium, which is widely present in most types of tissues. As a cellular “antenna,” it receives various signals from the extracellular environment, including light, low molecular weight chemicals, proteins, and mechanical stimuli [14]. The structure of the cilium mainly contains three parts: the basal body, the transition zone, and the axoneme (Figure 1). The basal body is derived from the mother centriole, containing ciliary rootlets (or striated rootlets), which is providing structural support for primary cilia [15]. In cycling cells, the centrosome is made up of mother centrioles, daughter centrioles, and a protein matrix called pericentriolar material. After mitosis, the paired centrioles become disengaged. In G0 cell cycle stage, the mother centriole is associated with Golgi-derived ciliated vesicles and migrates near the plasma membrane to become a basal body [15, 16]. Subsequently, the distal appendages carried by the mother centriole form transition fibers (connected to the cell membrane), while the subdistal appendages become the basal foot [17, 18]. The transition zone, an intermediate region between the basal body and the axoneme, consists of transition fibers and Y-links, which act as a ciliary gate, controlling soluble proteins and selected components in and out of cilia [19–21]. Here, the nine microtubules of the basal body are transformed from triplets into doublets, which form the backbone of the ciliary axoneme (known as the arrangement, it lacks one pair of central microtubules and dynein arms, which is different from motor cilia) [22]. In addition, the axoneme is covered with a ciliary membrane that extends to the plasma membrane, but has different components. The ciliary membrane contains a pore complex for size-based exclusion—only specific proteins can be located in the primary cilia [23, 24]. This feature makes primary cilia form a special subcellular microdomain to play its unique signaling role. Hundreds of ciliary proteins have been identified [25, 26], and we listed some of the proteins associated with cartilage (Table 1). Remarkably, the deep hole between cell membrane and ciliary membrane is called the ciliary pocket, which engages in endocytic activity and interacts with the actin-based cytoskeleton [27].

Figure 1

The structure of primary cilium. The cilium structure mostly contains three parts: the basal body, transition zone, and axoneme. The basal body locates at the ciliary bottom, which is associated with other cellular organelles (such as the nucleus and Golgi body). The transition zone is between the basal body and the axoneme, acting as a “gatekeeper”; it controls the entry and exit of various substances and proteins. The axoneme consists of nine pairs of doublet microtubules and covers with a ciliary membrane, which is the main component of primary cilia sensing the extracellular signal.

3. The Material Transport of Primary Cilia

Intraflagellar transport (IFT) is a two-way cargo transport system, and all signaling within the primary cilia must be IFT-dependent to complete. Generally, it is divided into anterograde IFT (moves from the base of a cilium to the tip) and retrograde IFT (moves from the tip back to the base), which are mediated by heterotrimeric kinesin-2 and cytoplasmic dynein 2 motor (some call cytoplasmic dynein 1b motor), respectively [36, 37]. In this IFT train, when the cargo needs to be transported in the basal body, the IFT-B complex aggregates and activates kinesin-2 and moves the cargo to the tip of axoneme and they dissociate, releasing the substance; then, the new cargo comes in and kinesin-2 deactivates whereas dynein 2 activates in bonding with the IFT-A complex and transports the new cargo to the basal body [38]. This transport mechanism is essential for the structure and function of primary cilia, as targeting interference with IFT proteins in animal models leads to the loss of primary cilia and phenotypes similar to human genetic ciliopathies [39, 40]. For example, in a Col2α1; IFT80f/f mouse model, the deletion of IFT80 results in growth retardation, shortened growth plate, thickening of the articular cartilage, and defects of the primary cilia [41].

4. Chondrocyte Primary Cilia

Chondrocytes are the only cell type located in the articular cartilage. Similar to most mammalian cells, chondrocytes contain primary cilia [42]. The characteristics of primary cilia, such as location, morphology, and incidence, are usually determined by distinct differentiated cell states [43]. For example, the length of the primary cilia increased after chondrogenic induction in ATDC5 cells (one type of prechondrocyte cell line), while the incidence was apparently not altered and ranged from 80% to 88%. In recent years, many scholars have detected the morphology of primary cilia in chondrocytes. Thereinto, the vast majority of literature reports describe the location of the primary cilia, which extends from the inner chondrocyte and interacts with the extracellular matrix [44, 45]. Here are some more specific comments describing the location of the primary cilia in chondrocytes. Reportedly, in agreement with the transmission electron microscopy, the immunocytochemistry images in situ and live cell confocal ex vivo depict that the chondrocyte primary cilia from femora in mature female Balb/C mice and horses were positioned within membranous invaginations into the cell (as already mentioned above “ciliary pocket”) and close to the nucleus without protrusion in the extracellular matrix, rather than projecting out from the cell membrane at the cell margin as seen in other cell types [46, 47]. In another way, McGlashan et al. [48] reported that primary cilia in the chondrocyte/agarose constructs were lying against the chondrocyte cell membrane or extending into the extracellular microenvironment. The inconsistency of the two results may be related to the different culture methods (in vivo or in vitro, explants, agarose constructs, or cell culture) or different types and sites of cultured animal cells, suggesting that the morphological manifestations of the chondrocyte primary cilia are affected by many factors.

The orientation of primary cilia appears to be important in the development of motor and sensory functions [49]. Stockwell [50] found that the adjacent chondrocytes of sheep could not show any consistent cilia localization. Furthermore, the orientation of chondrocyte primary cilia from load bearing and nonload regions of the equine femoral condyles in the coronal plane was random, and the orientation in the superficial area and in the radiation area was different [47]. The axoneme orientation of the chondrocyte primary cilia in the superficial region is parallel to the articular surface, while others in the radiation region point directly to the articular surface. Besides, ultrastructural studies have shown that chondrocyte primary cilia are located on the basal side of individual chondrocytes in the superficial and middle cartilage zones, on either of the two sides perpendicular to the articular surface in the cartilage/bone interface region and on the side adjacent to the second cell within a chondron [46]. This seems to be somewhat different from previous findings, possibly resulting from factors such as the orientation and location of the slice.

Like previously reported mesenchymal stem cells [51], epithelial cells [52], and trophoblastic cells [53], the incidence of articular chondrocyte cilia is also a cilia per cell [49, 54]. In particular, studies have shown that the incidence of primary cilia is positively related to cell density, cell density increases, and the expression of primary cilia increases [55]. In addition, the incidence and length of primary cilia in normal chondrocytes changed by the zonal region, all of which increased with the distance from the surface of the joint [56]. At the same time, they can also be affected by the surrounding environment of chondrocytes, such as inflammation, osmotic pressure, and mechanical load. In this process, the length, incidence, and orientation of primary cilia change accordingly. The length and incidence of chondrocyte primary cilia in OA have been reported to increase [56]. Under imaging of the femoral condyle in mice, chondrocyte primary cilia length decreased significantly after hypo- or hyperosmotic stimulation while primary cilia incidence remained unchanged [46]. This indicates that primary cilia are sensitive to physical and chemical stimuli and can help chondrocytes perceive and respond to mechanical stress [29]. During prolonged periods (>24 hours) of compressive strain, primary cilia length and incidence decrease on chondrocytes from bovine metacarpophalangeal joints seeded in agarose, but the changes were reversible after removal of compression and culture for an additional 72 h [48]. Similarly, Xiang et al. [57] found that the primary cilia expression was inhibited in rat knee chondrocytes under high-intensity pressure (4000 μstrain) and that the length was shortened. The above findings indicate that mechanical stress is quite closely related to the chondrocyte primary cilia. We hypothesized that chondrocyte primary cilia affect cartilage development through multiple signaling pathways and influence the development of OA.

In the human articular cartilage, no new chondrocytes are produced once bone growth is completed. Therefore, damage to or apoptosis of chondrocytes will lead to an imbalance in cartilage homeostasis, the degradation of the extracellular matrix, and the degeneration of cartilage [58]. OA is a degenerative joint disease characterized by an imbalance between the catabolism and anabolism of the cartilage matrix. In this process, the primary cilia, a signal receiver, are important components of chondrocyte signal transduction, with the cilium believed to be involved in and mediating extrachondrogenic matrix degradation [59]. Mechanical stimulation is an important stimulus most commonly felt by chondrocytes and an important influencing factor in cartilage degeneration. The prevailing theory is that mechanical stimulation causes chondrocyte primary cilia to alter morphology to initiate a downstream signaling cascade [60]. In the following, we will discuss the signaling transduction pathways related to OA that have been shown to be coordinated by primary cilia, such as the Hedgehog (Hh) signal pathways and Wnt signal pathways.

5.1. Hedgehog Signaling Pathways

In mammals, the Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway is mainly composed of Hh ligands, receptors, smoothened protein (SMO), suppressor of fused (Sufu), and Gli. There are three Hh ligands: sonic hedgehog (Shh), Indian hedgehog (Ihh), and desert hedgehog (Dhh). The transmembrane receptor patched (Ptc), as a common receptor in the Hh ligand, plays a key role in the reception and transduction of Hh signals [61]. SMO, a transmembrane protein of the GPCR superfamily that acts downstream of Ptc, is an important positive regulator of Hh signaling and whose activity is regulated by Ptc [62]. Suppressor of fused (Sufu) is a highly conserved protein with strong inhibitory activity, and its removal leads to ectopic activation of the Hh pathway [63]. In the absence of Hh signaling, the interaction between the Sufu and Gli proteins plays a key role in promoting the processing of Gli into truncated repressor forms [64, 65]. As a transcription factor, Gli is a key effector of Hh activity. Among them, Gli1, which lacks the repressor domain of the N-terminal region, acts only as a transcriptional activator [66]. Gli2 and Gli3 have dual activity, but the main function of Gli3 in the Hh signaling pathway is an inhibitor (GliR), and GLI2 is an activator (GliA) [67]. Without Hh ligand, Ptc inhibits SMO activity, puts it in a closed state, increases PKA activity, promotes the phosphorylation of the Sufu and Gli complexes, processes it into a truncated repressor form of GliR at the C-terminus, and suppresses Hh target genes in the nucleus. When the Hh pathway is activated, Hh ligands bind to the Ptc receptor to release inhibition of SMO, which inhibits Gli processing, prompting the full-length Gli transcription factor into the nucleus to activate relevant target genes.

As research progresses, the role of Hh signaling in OA chondrocytes has been preliminarily clarified. Hh signaling regulates the growth and differentiation of normal chondrocytes, in which Indian hedgehog (Ihh) is the major ligand expressed in the OA cartilage [68–70]. In this regard, primary cilia are necessary for both ligand Indian hedgehog- (Ihh-) mediated and mechanical loading-mediated Hh signaling activation in chondrocytes [71, 72]. Chondrocyte hypertrophy is a common manifestation of OA. The Ihh is secreted by prehypertrophic chondrocytes to regulate hypertrophy and mineralization of chondrocytes during chondrogenesis [73]. Instead, parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) can inhibit chondrocyte hypertrophy and maintain chondrocyte proliferation [74, 75]. Multiple studies have demonstrated that increased Ihh signaling activates the PTHrP signaling pathway in hypertrophic chondrocytes, causing overexpression of genes associated with cartilage degeneration and the development of OA [76–78]. The overexpression of PTHrP also causes negative feedback, resulting in inhibition of the expression of the Ihh signal, which reverses the chondrocyte hypertrophy and protects the cartilage. The imbalance or disorder of the Ihh-PTHrP signaling pathway may be one of the mechanisms that causes cartilage degeneration in OA [79–81]. Regardless, the importance of the Ihh-PTHrP negative feedback loop is recognized in OA progression. As described above, this suggests the possibility that blocking Ihh signaling can be used as a treatment to prevent or delay cartilage degeneration. Nevertheless, Ihh knockout may not be a treatment option as it has greater uncertainty in animal experiments. The col2α1-Cre; Ihh^d/Ihh^d mutants died shortly after birth and were smaller in size, exhibiting malformed and retarded growth of limbs with severe skeletal deformities [82]. Another Col2a1-CreER (T2); Ihh (fl/fl) mouse genetic study provides direct evidence that conditional knockout of Ihh in chondrocytes can reduce catabolism, increase anabolic biomarkers production, and slow OA progression [83]. These findings suggest that Ihh is possibly a target point in OA treatment.

The primary cilia are the signal transduction centers of Hh [84], and their length is thought to regulate the function of the cilium, partially controlled by IFT activity. In the articular cartilage, the primary cilia length of OA increases, and Hh signaling is activated. Lin et al. and Thompson et al. [85, 86] demonstrated that the activation level of the Hh signal in human and animal samples is positively correlated with the severity of OA. Upregulation of the Hh signal leads to an increase in osteoarthritis markers, such as ADAMTS5, RUNX2, and MMP13, which accelerate the progression of OA. The pathological mechanism may be that the increased cilia length and incidence of articular cartilage are affected by pathological stimulation, resulting in abnormal activation of Hh signals and promoting the cartilage degeneration in OA (Figure 2). Therefore, blocking Hh signals may be a new treatment for osteoarthritis. Moreover, it has been reported that lithium chloride injection in animal models of OA can protect joints and reduce cartilage damage by regulating primary cilia elongation and inhibiting Hh signals in chondrocytes [87]. This paradox suggests that more researches focused on the mechanisms of the interaction of primary cilia length and Hh signaling in OA are needed. Together, these studies indicated that Hh signaling is a potent therapeutic target for preventing or delaying cartilage degeneration.

(a)

(b)

Figure 2

A brief diagram of Hh signaling under pathological stimuli. Histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) is a tubulin deacetylase that regulates the length of the primary cilia. Under normal conditions, the expression of HDAC6 maintains the length of the primary cilia. When the Hh ligand is not activated, Ptc inhibits SMO activity, puts it in a closed state, increases PKA activity, promotes phosphorylation of the SuFu and Gli complex, processes into a truncated repressor form of Gli repressor (GliR), and suppresses Hh target genes in the nucleus (a). Upon pathological stimulation, HDAC6 expression is abnormally increased, promoting primary ciliary elongation and activating the Hh signaling pathway. When the Hh ligand binds to the Ptc receptor to release inhibition of SMO, Smo inhibits Gli processing, causing the full-length Gli activator (GliA) to enter the nucleus to activate relevant target genes such as ADAMTS5 and RUNX2, which causes changes in OA.

5.2. Wnt Signaling Pathways

Primary cilia act as “antennae” of cells and are involved in the regulation of numerous signaling pathways, including Wnt [88]. Wnt signaling pathways are generally divided into canonical Wnt-β-catenin pathways and noncanonical Wnt-planar cell polarity (PCP) pathways. However, it is not clear what specific role primary cilia play in the Wnt signaling pathway. The first is that primary cilia negatively regulate canonical Wnt signaling. Elevated β-catenin levels are a hallmark of the activation of canonical Wnt signaling [89]. Lancaster et al. [90] reported stronger nuclear β-catenin staining in nonciliated cells compared to neighboring ciliated cells and that loss of cilia leads to enhanced Wnt signaling. Alternatively, Hassounah et al. [91] found that the presence of primary cilia was inversely associated with nuclear β-catenin in normal prostate tissue. This is consistent with the finding that primary cilia in cells inhibit canonical Wnt signaling. The second view is that primary cilia play a molecular switch between canonical and noncanonical Wnt signaling activity. Specifically, as in renal tubular epithelial cells, the presence of primary cilia can facilitate noncanonical Wnt signaling responses, while the loss of intact cilia enhances canonical Wnt signaling [92]. This seems to be an extension of the first view. The third opinion is that there is no relationship between cilia and Wnt signaling. For example, the IFT mutant mouse model did not change its Wnt activity compared to the wild-type [93]. These findings were validated in the zebrafish models. The maternal zygote ovule mutants that lack Ift88 lost all primary cilia, but still retained normal canonical and noncanonical Wnt signaling [94]. In recent years, apart from the signaling role of primary cilia, researchers have also argued about the role of Wnt signaling in ciliogenesis. Canonical Wnt signaling has been reported to induce primary ciliogenesis, while noncanonical Wnt signaling induced primary cilia disassembly [95]. In contrast, Bernatik et al. [96] blocked Wnt signaling by using the porcupine inhibitor LGK974, suggesting that Wnt ligand-mediated signaling is not required for primary ciliogenesis. The difference in these two conclusions can be attributed to differences in methodology, such as nutrient fluid, antibodies that mark the primary cilia, and experimental timing. Taken together, Wnt ligands may transmit signals in two cilia-dependent or independent ways.

Currently, research on cartilage-related pathways is mainly focused on canonical Wnt-β-catenin pathways. Canonical Wnt signaling pathways are mediated by β-catenin, which accumulates in the cytoplasm and then is transferred to the nucleus to form complexes with DNA-binding T-cell factors (TCFs), resulting in the activation of target gene transcription. The Wnt signaling network is active in adult cartilage and is involved in the regulation of differentiation, proliferation, and maturation during the life cycle of chondrocytes [97]. According to the human genetic experimental analysis, FRZB and DKK1, which are secreted inhibitor of Wnt, can inhibit the hypertrophic differentiation of articular cartilage and reduce the OA-like alterations [98, 99]. Thus, the activation of canonical Wnt signaling may play a detrimental role in OA development. Furthermore, increased levels of β-catenin and activation of the Wnt signal result in premature differentiation of chondrocytes and destruction of OA-like articular cartilage in Col2a1-CreER^T2 and β-catenin^fx(Ex3)/wt transgenic mice [100]. It indicates that inhibition of Wnt signaling may be a therapeutic target to attenuate OA phenotypes. However, inhibition of β-catenin signal transduction in articular chondrocytes leads to increased chondrocyte apoptosis and articular cartilage destruction in Col2a1-ICAT transgenic mice [101]. Taken together, human and animal experiments provide evidence that canonical Wnt signaling is involved in OA pathogenesis and suggest that Wnt signaling appears to have a dual role in articular cartilage. There is evidence that a certain level of Wnt signaling is required to maintain the healthy state of articular cartilage [102]. How Wnt signals should be regulated in the future to restore articular cartilage homeostasis requires further study.

5.3. IL-1β-Related Signaling Pathways

In the development of OA, the role of inflammatory factors cannot be ignored. In inflammatory pathologies, the quintessentially proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and its receptors are upregulated as part of the broad spectrum of inflammatory mediators activated in many cell types. In chondrocytes, the IFT system in primary cilia is required for proinflammatory signaling of IL-1β [31]. Reportedly, IL-1β induces primary cilia elongation through protein kinases (including PKA) and NFκB signaling pathways, which in turn increases nitric oxide and prostaglandin E2 release and promotes the occurrence of inflammatory reactions, while mutations in the IFT88 gene lead to cilia deletion in chondrocytes, resulting in a reduction in the inflammatory response [103–105]. Moreover, according to the research of Fu et al. [28], IL-1β (1 ng/ml) intervention in isolated chondrocytes increased the length of primary cilia to a median value of 2.21–2.84 μm. However, this extension can be blocked by mechanical load, hypotonic challenge, and TRPV4 activation.

5.4. Hypoxia-Related Signaling Pathway

There is no capillary network in cartilage, so the chondrocyte microenvironment is usually in an anoxic state. Due to the hypoxic microenvironment of cartilage, hypoxia-inducible factors play an important role in cartilage development and homeostasis [106]. Among them, hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) is a protective factor for cartilage destruction, while HIF-2α is a catabolic factor in OA [107, 108]. It has been found that nuclear expression of both HIF-1α and HIF-2α was elevated under hypoxia stimulation, along with a decrease in the incidence of primary cilia [109]. This proves that the two may participate together in the regression of the primary cilia. Interestingly, knockout or overexpression HIF-1α or HIF-2α individually suggests that HIF-2α can induce a reduction in primary cilia and promote OA development, rather than HIF-1α [110]. This finding indicates that HIF-2α may be a new target for OA therapy. In addition, the presence of HIF-2 was found at the base of the chondrocyte primary cilia [33]. IL-1β-treated chondrocytes, with increased HIF-2α expression and gradual accumulation at the ciliary base and axoneme, further drive primary ciliary elongation and exacerbate inflammation.

5.5. Other Signaling Pathways

Studies have found the presence of multiple matrix receptors such as integrins (α2, α3, and β1) and NG2 on chondrocyte primary cilia, implicating that primary cilia participate in the signaling process associated with the synthesis and maintenance of the extracellular matrix [111]. The most typical receptor is integrin, a heterogeneous dimer transmembrane receptor that binds to many cartilage extracellular matrix molecules [112]. Within the cell, these receptors form complexes with associated ligands (including collagen, fibronectin, and laminin), activate the intracellular signal cascade, and regulate the gene expression of matrix molecules [113]. Therefore, primary cilia mutations that cause integrin signaling abnormalities may be the main cause of cartilage extracellular matrix degradation and one of the possible mechanisms of OA. In addition, GAL3, a key regulator of cartilage homeostasis and primary cilia formation in mice, is the base of chondrocyte primary cilia, whose absence promotes chondrocyte apoptosis through the mitochondrial pathway [114].

6. Conclusions and Perspectives

OA is a disabling joint disorder, and mechanical loading is an important pathogenesis [115]. A wide variety of cell types exhibit mechanosensitive behavior across cell activity, and there is growing evidence that primary cilia are key mechanosensory organelles in chondrocytes [29, 116]. In the articular cartilage, mechanical loading is essential for development, health, and homeostasis through the control of ECM synthesis and catabolism. It is therefore to be expected that primary cilia will have a significant impact not only on bone dysplasia but also on joint degenerative diseases, including OA [117–119].

Primary cilia are found in all murine chondrocytes and in 96% of equine chondrocytes, as well as in human and bovine chondrocytes [54, 56, 120]. Through transmission electron microscopy, electron tomography, and confocal microscopy, all cilia were straight in the absence of matrix, while various bending patterns were observed in chondrocyte cilia within a cartilage matrix or in situ [121, 122]. Thus, this observation suggests that, in addition to cilia lengthening, cilia bending is also a form of response to mechanical forces in the cartilage matrix. However, no research has been performed to clarify how the amplitude and frequency of cilia bending can affect OA diseases. Additionally, there are several key questions remain to be addressed, including but not limited to the morphological changes and specific signaling mechanisms of primary cilia-mediated OA, how to regulate primary cilia to repair articular cartilage, and the interaction between the chondrocyte primary cilia and the extracellular matrix. Regardless, targeting primary cilia may be a hot topic for future OA therapy.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Ying Kong and Changjie Zhang are assigned to the conceptualization. Haiqi Zhou and Sha Wu prepared the original draft. Haiqi Zhou and Huixian Ling are responsible for writing the review and editing. Ying Kong and Changjie Zhang are assigned to the supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This article is supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 8206090154). We thank Professor Zhi Tian for the scientific editing of the manuscript.

References

B. Abramoff and F. E. Caldera, “Osteoarthritis: pathology, diagnosis, and treatment options,” The Medical Clinics of North America, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 293–311, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Hunter, L. March, and M. Chew, “Osteoarthritis in 2020 and beyond: a Lancet commission,” The Lancet, vol. 396, no. 10264, pp. 1711-1712, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Kolasinski, T. Neogi, M. C. Hochberg et al., “2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the management of osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee,” Arthritis & Rhematology, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 220–233, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Hunter and S. Bierma-Zeinstra, “Osteoarthritis,” The Lancet, vol. 393, no. 10182, pp. 1745–1759, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Duan, H. Xie, and Z. Z. Liu, “The role of autophagy in osteoarthritis,” Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology, vol. 8, article 608388, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. S. Hwang and H. A. Kim, “Chondrocyte apoptosis in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 26035–26054, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Scherft and W. T. Daems, “Single cilia in chondrocytes,” Journal of Ultrastructure Research, vol. 19, no. 5-6, pp. 546–555, 1967.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Hildebrandt, T. Benzing, and N. Katsanis, “Ciliopathies,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, no. 16, pp. 1533–1543, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Cassidy, J. Slyne, M. Higgins et al., “Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is localised to the primary cilium in renal tubular epithelial cells - a novel source of urinary biomarkers of renal injury,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1865, no. 12, article 165532, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Ghosh, C. A. Murga-Zamalloa, L. Chan, P. F. Hitchcock, A. Swaroop, and H. Khanna, “Human retinopathy-associated ciliary protein retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator mediates cilia-dependent vertebrate development,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 90–98, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Wormser, L. Gradstein, Y. Yogev et al., “_SCAPER_ localizes to primary cilia and its mutation affects cilia length, causing Bardet-Biedl syndrome,” European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 928–940, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Irianto, G. Ramaswamy, R. Serra, and M. M. Knight, “Depletion of chondrocyte primary cilia reduces the compressive modulus of articular cartilage,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 579–582, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Li, S. Yang, V. Deepak, Z. Chinipardaz, and S. Yang, “Identification of cilia in different mouse tissues,” Cell, vol. 10, no. 7, p. 1623, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Malicki and C. A. Johnson, “The cilium: cellular antenna and central processing unit,” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 126–140, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kobayashi and B. D. Dynlacht, “Regulating the transition from centriole to basal body,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 193, no. 3, pp. 435–444, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Devi, L. Pelletier, and S. L. Prosser, “Charting the complex composite nature of centrosomes, primary cilia and centriolar satellites,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 66, pp. 32–40, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Joukov and A. De Nicolo, “The centrosome and the primary cilium: the yin and yang of a hybrid organelle,” Cells, vol. 8, no. 7, p. 701, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Molla-Herman, K. M. Davis, K. Mykytyn, and A. Benmerah, “Monitoring β-arrestin 2 targeting to the centrosome, basal body, and primary cilium by fluorescence microscopy,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1957, pp. 271–289, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Fry, M. J. Leaper, and R. Bayliss, “The primary cilium: guardian of organ development and homeostasis,” Organogenesis, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 62–68, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. G. Czarnecki and J. V. Shah, “The ciliary transition zone: from morphology and molecules to medicine,” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 201–210, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Lapart, M. Gottardo, E. Cortier et al., “Dzip1 and Fam92 form a ciliary transition zone complex with cell type specific roles in drosophila,” eLife, vol. 8, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. A. Petriman and E. Lorentzen, “Structural insights into the architecture and assembly of eukaryotic flagella,” Microb Cell, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 289–299, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. K. Breslow, E. F. Koslover, F. Seydel, A. J. Spakowitz, and M. V. Nachury, “An in vitro assay for entry into cilia reveals unique properties of the soluble diffusion barrier,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 203, no. 1, pp. 129–147, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. L. Kee, J. F. Dishinger, T. Lynne Blasius, C. J. Liu, B. Margolis, and K. J. Verhey, “A size-exclusion permeability barrier and nucleoporins characterize a ciliary pore complex that regulates transport into cilia,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 431–437, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ishikawa, J. Thompson, J. R. Yates III., and W. F. Marshall, “Proteomic analysis of mammalian primary cilia,” Current Biology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 414–419, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. U. Mick, R. B. Rodrigues, R. D. Leib et al., “Proteomics of primary cilia by proximity labeling,” Developmental Cell, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 497–512, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Molla-Herman, R. Ghossoub, T. Blisnick et al., “The ciliary pocket: an endocytic membrane domain at the base of primary and motile cilia,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 123, no. 10, pp. 1785–1795, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Fu, H. Meng, S. Inamdar et al., “Activation of TRPV4 by mechanical, osmotic or pharmaceutical stimulation is anti-inflammatory blocking IL-1β mediated articular cartilage matrix destruction,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 89–99, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Wann, N. Zuo, C. J. Haycraft et al., “Primary cilia mediate mechanotransduction through control of ATP-induced Ca²⁺ signaling in compressed chondrocytes,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1663–1671, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Thompson, M. McFie, J. P. Chapple, P. Beales, and M. M. Knight, “Polycystin-2 is required for chondrocyte mechanotransduction and traffics to the primary cilium in response to mechanical stimulation,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 22, no. 9, p. 4313, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Fu, C. L. Thompson, A. Ali et al., “Mechanical loading inhibits cartilage inflammatory signalling via an HDAC6 and IFT-dependent mechanism regulating primary cilia elongation,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1064–1074, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. D. Thorpe, S. Gambassi, C. L. Thompson, C. Chandrakumar, A. Santucci, and M. M. Knight, “Reduced primary cilia length and altered Arl13b expression are associated with deregulated chondrocyte hedgehog signaling in alkaptonuria,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 232, no. 9, pp. 2407–2417, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Wann, C. L. Thompson, J. P. Chapple, and M. M. Knight, “Interleukin-1β sequesters hypoxia inducible factor 2α to the primary cilium,” Cilia, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 17, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kawasaki, Y. Ezura, T. Hayata, T. Notomi, Y. Izu, and M. Noda, “TGF-β suppresses Ift88 expression in chondrocytic ATDC5 cells,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 230, no. 11, pp. 2788–2795, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Hwang, K. A. White, B. N. Somatilaka, J. M. Shelton, J. A. Richardson, and S. Mukhopadhyay, “The G protein-coupled receptor Gpr161 regulates forelimb formation, limb patterning and skeletal morphogenesis in a primary cilium-dependent manner,” Development, vol. 145, no. 1, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Huang, L. L. Dougherty, and P. Avasthi, “Separable roles for RanGTP in nuclear and ciliary trafficking of a kinesin-2 subunit,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 296, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, Y. Dai et al., “Ciliary localization of folliculin mediated via a kinesin-2-binding motif is required for its functions in mTOR regulation and tumor suppression,” FEBS Letters, vol. 595, no. 1, pp. 123–132, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Chien, S. M. Shih, R. Bower, D. Tritschler, M. E. Porter, and A. Yildiz, “Dynamics of the IFT machinery at the ciliary tip,” eLife, vol. 6, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Yuan, R. A. Serra, and S. Yang, “Function and regulation of primary cilia and intraflagellar transport proteins in the skeleton,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1335, no. 1, pp. 78–99, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. J. Haycraft, Q. Zhang, B. Song et al., “Intraflagellar transport is essential for endochondral bone formation,” Development, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 307–316, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Yuan and S. Yang, “Deletion of IFT80 impairs epiphyseal and articular cartilage formation due to disruption of chondrocyte differentiation,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 6, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Yuan and S. Yang, “Primary cilia and intraflagellar transport proteins in bone and cartilage,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 95, no. 12, pp. 1341–1349, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Upadhyai, V. S. Guleria, and P. Udupa, “Characterization of primary cilia features reveal cell-type specific variability in in vitro models of osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation,” PeerJ, vol. 8, article e9799, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Poole, C. G. Jensen, J. A. Snyder, C. G. Gray, V. L. Hermanutz, and D. N. Wheatley, “Confocal analysis of primary cilia structure and colocalization with the Golgi apparatus in chondrocytes and aortic smooth muscle cells,” Cell Biology International, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 483–494, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. J. Wilsman, “Cilia of adult canine articular chondrocytes,” Journal of Ultrastructure Research, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 270–281, 1978.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. R. Rich and A. L. Clark, “Chondrocyte primary cilia shorten in response to osmotic challenge and are sites for endocytosis,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 923–930, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. E. Farnum and N. J. Wilsman, “Orientation of primary cilia of articular chondrocytes in three-dimensional space,” Anat Rec (Hoboken), vol. 294, no. 3, pp. 533–549, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. McGlashan, M. M. Knight, T. T. Chowdhury et al., “Mechanical loading modulates chondrocyte primary cilia incidence and length,” Cell Biology International, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 441–446, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. J. Wislman and T. F. Fletcher, “Cilia of neonatal articular chondrocytes incidence and morphology,” The Anatomical Record, vol. 190, no. 4, pp. 871–889, 1978.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Stockwell, “The ultrastructure of cartilage canals and the surrounding cartilage in the sheep fetus,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 397–410, 1971.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Ma, M. Qin, H. Liang et al., “Primary cilia-dependent signaling is involved in regulating mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and pluripotency maintenance,” Journal of Molecular Histology, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 241–250, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Jamal, A. C. F. Nunes, N. D. Vaziri et al., “Rapamycin treatment correlates changes in primary cilia expression with cell cycle regulation in epithelial cells,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 178, article 114056, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ritter, S. Roth, N. N. Kreis et al., “Primary cilia in trophoblastic cells: potential involvement in preeclampsia,” Hypertension, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 1491–1505, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. J. Wilsman, C. E. Farnum, and D. K. Reed-Aksamit, “Incidence and morphology of equine and murine chondrocytic cilia,” The Anatomical Record, vol. 197, no. 3, pp. 355–361, 1980.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. N. Wheatley, A. M. Wang, and G. E. Strugnell, “Expression of primary cilia in mammalian cells,” Cell Biology International, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 73–81, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. McGlashan, E. C. Cluett, C. G. Jensen, and C. A. Poole, “Primary cilia in osteoarthritic chondrocytes: from chondrons to clusters,” Developmental Dynamics, vol. 237, no. 8, pp. 2013–2020, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Xiang, T. Jiang, X. Hao et al., “Primary cilia and autophagy interaction is involved in mechanical stress mediated cartilage development via ERK/mTOR axis,” Life Sciences, vol. 218, pp. 308–313, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Loening, I. E. James, M. E. Levenston et al., “Injurious mechanical compression of bovine articular cartilage induces chondrocyte apoptosis,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 381, no. 2, pp. 205–212, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Collins and A. K. T. Wann, “Regulation of the extracellular matrix by ciliary machinery,” Cell, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 278, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Spasic and C. R. Jacobs, “Primary cilia: cell and molecular mechanosensors directing whole tissue function,” Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, vol. 71, pp. 42–52, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Marigo, R. A. Davey, Y. Zuo, J. M. Cunningham, and C. J. Tabin, “Biochemical evidence that patched is the hedgehog receptor,” Nature, vol. 384, no. 6605, pp. 176–179, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Huangfu and K. V. Anderson, “Signaling from Smo to Ci/Gli: conservation and divergence of hedgehog pathways fromDrosophilato vertebrates,” Development, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 3–14, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Svard, K. H. Henricson, M. Persson-Lek et al., “Genetic elimination of suppressor of fused reveals an essential repressor function in the mammalian hedgehog signaling pathway,” Developmental Cell, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 187–197, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. W. Humke, K. V. Dorn, L. Milenkovic, M. P. Scott, and R. Rohatgi, “The output of hedgehog signaling is controlled by the dynamic association between suppressor of fused and the Gli proteins,” Genes & Development, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 670–682, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Methot and K. Basler, “Suppressor of fused opposes hedgehog signal transduction by impeding nuclear accumulation of the activator form of Cubitus interruptus,” Development, vol. 127, no. 18, pp. 4001–4010, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Dai, H. Akimaru, Y. Tanaka, T. Maekawa, M. Nakafuku, and S. Ishii, “Sonic hedgehog-induced activation of the _Gli1_ promoter is mediated by GLI3,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 12, pp. 8143–8152, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. L. Park, C. Bai, K. A. Platt et al., “Mouse Gli1 mutants are viable but have defects in SHH signaling in combination with a Gli2 mutation,” Development, vol. 127, no. 8, pp. 1593–1605, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Wei, J. Zhou, X. Wei et al., “Activation of Indian hedgehog promotes chondrocyte hypertrophy and upregulation of MMP-13 in human osteoarthritic cartilage,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 755–763, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Zhang, X. Wei, C. Chen et al., “Indian hedgehog in synovial fluid is a novel marker for early cartilage lesions in human knee joint,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 7250–7265, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhou, X. Wei, and L. Wei, “Indian hedgehog, a critical modulator in osteoarthritis, could be a potential therapeutic target for attenuating cartilage degeneration disease,” Connective Tissue Research, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 257–261, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Han, H. R. Park, E. J. Lee et al., “Dicam promotes proliferation and maturation of chondrocyte through Indian hedgehog signaling in primary cilia,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 945–953, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. He, R. Subramanian, F. Bangs et al., “The kinesin-4 protein Kif7 regulates mammalian hedgehog signalling by organizing the cilium tip compartment,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 663–672, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Li and S. Dong, “The signaling pathways involved in chondrocyte differentiation and hypertrophic differentiation,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2016, Article ID 2470351, 12 pages, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Lanske, A. C. Karaplis, K. Lee et al., “PTH/PTHrP receptor in early development and Indian hedgehog-regulated bone growth,” Science, vol. 273, no. 5275, pp. 663–666, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kamper, M. Paulsson, and F. Zaucke, “Absence of collagen IX accelerates hypertrophic differentiation in the embryonic mouse spine through a disturbance of the Ihh-PTHrP feedback loop,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 367, no. 2, pp. 359–367, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Vortkamp, K. Lee, B. Lanske, G. V. Segre, H. M. Kronenberg, and C. J. Tabin, “Regulation of rate of cartilage differentiation by Indian hedgehog and PTH-related protein,” Science, vol. 273, no. 5275, pp. 613–622, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Yoshida, M. Noshiro, T. Kawamoto, S. Tsutsumi, Y. Kuruta, and Y. Kato, “Direct inhibition of Indian hedgehog expression by parathyroid hormone (PTH)/PTH-related peptide and up-regulation by retinoic acid in growth plate chondrocyte cultures,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 265, no. 1, pp. 64–72, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Nishimura, K. Hata, E. Nakamura, T. Murakami, and Y. Takahata, “Transcriptional network systems in cartilage development and disease,” Histochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 149, no. 4, pp. 353–363, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Wang, J. M. Taboas, and R. S. Tuan, “PTHrP overexpression partially inhibits a mechanical strain-induced arthritic phenotype in chondrocytes,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 213–221, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Guo, X. Wei, Z. Zhang et al., “Ipriflavone attenuates the degeneration of cartilage by blocking the Indian hedgehog pathway,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 109, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Luo, Y. Zhang, and Y. Huang, “Icariin reduces cartilage degeneration in a mouse model of osteoarthritis and is associated with the changes in expression of Indian hedgehog and parathyroid hormone-related protein,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 24, pp. 6695–6706, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Razzaque, D. W. Soegiarto, D. Chang, F. Long, and B. Lanske, “Conditional deletion of Indian hedgehog from collagen type 2α1-expressing cells results in abnormal endochondral bone formation,” The Journal of Pathology, vol. 207, no. 4, pp. 453–461, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhou, Q. Chen, B. Lanske et al., “Disrupting the Indian hedgehog signaling pathway in vivo attenuates surgically induced osteoarthritis progression in Col2a1-CreERT2; Ihhfl/fl mice,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 16, no. 1, p. R11, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Goetz, P. J. Ocbina, and K. V. Anderson, “The primary cilium as a hedgehog signal transduction machine,” Methods in Cell Biology, vol. 94, pp. 199–222, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Lin, B. L. Seeto, J. M. Bartoszko et al., “Modulating hedgehog signaling can attenuate the severity of osteoarthritis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1421–1425, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Thompson, J. P. Chapple, and M. M. Knight, “Primary cilia disassembly down-regulates mechanosensitive hedgehog signalling: a feedback mechanism controlling ADAMTS-5 expression in chondrocytes,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 490–498, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Thompson, A. Wiles, C. A. Poole, and M. M. Knight, “Lithium chloride modulates chondrocyte primary cilia and inhibits hedgehog signaling,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 716–726, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. C. Oh and N. Katsanis, “Context-dependent regulation of Wnt signaling through the primary cilium,” J Am Soc Nephrol, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Nusse, “Wnt signaling in disease and in development,” Cell Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 28–32, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Lancaster, J. Schroth, and J. G. Gleeson, “Subcellular spatial regulation of canonical Wnt signalling at the primary cilium,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 700–707, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. B. Hassounah, R. Nagle, K. Saboda, D. J. Roe, B. L. Dalkin, and K. M. McDermott, “Primary cilia are lost in preinvasive and invasive prostate cancer,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 7, article e68521, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Saito, B. Tampe, G. A. Müller, and M. Zeisberg, “Primary cilia modulate balance of canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling responses in the injured kidney,” Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 6, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Ocbina, M. Tuson, and K. V. Anderson, “Primary cilia are not required for normal canonical Wnt signaling in the mouse embryo,” PLoS One, vol. 4, no. 8, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Huang and A. F. Schier, “Dampened hedgehog signaling but normal Wnt signaling in zebrafish without cilia,” Development, vol. 136, no. 18, pp. 3089–3098, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. H. Lee, “Involvement of Wnt signaling in primary cilia assembly and disassembly,” The FEBS Journal, vol. 287, no. 23, pp. 5027–5038, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Bernatik, P. Paclikova, A. Kotrbova, V. Bryja, and L. Cajanek, “Primary cilia formation does not rely on WNT/β-catenin signaling,” Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology, vol. 9, article 623753, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. E. Yates, S. Shortkroff, and R. G. Reish, “Wnt influence on chondrocyte differentiation and cartilage function,” DNA and Cell Biology, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 446–457, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Leijten, J. Emons, C. Sticht et al., “Gremlin 1, frizzled-related protein, and Dkk-1 are key regulators of human articular cartilage homeostasis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 3302–3312, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Leijten, S. D. Bos, E. B. M. Landman et al., “GREM1, FRZB and DKK1 mRNA levels correlate with osteoarthritis and are regulated by osteoarthritis-associated factors,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 15, no. 5, p. R126, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhu, D. Tang, Q. Wu et al., “Activation of beta-catenin signaling in articular chondrocytes leads to osteoarthritis-like phenotype in adult beta-catenin conditional activation mice,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 12–21, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhu, M. Chen, M. Zuscik et al., “Inhibition of β‐catenin signaling in articular chondrocytes results in articular cartilage destruction,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 2053–2064, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Usami, A. T. Gunawardena, M. Iwamoto, and M. Enomoto-Iwamoto, “Wnt signaling in cartilage development and diseases: lessons from animal studies,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 186–196, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Wann and M. M. Knight, “Primary cilia elongation in response to interleukin-1 mediates the inflammatory response,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 69, no. 17, pp. 2967–2977, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Wann, J. P. Chapple, and M. M. Knight, “The primary cilium influences interleukin-1β-induced NFκB signalling by regulating IKK activity,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1735–1742, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Fu, H. Meng, F. Freer, J. Kwon, J. C. Shelton, and M. M. Knight, “Sub-toxic levels of Co²⁺ are anti-inflammatory and protect cartilage from degradation caused by IL-1β,” Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), vol. 79, article 104924, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Cheng, S. Pourteymoor, C. Alarcon, and S. Mohan, “Conditional deletion of the _Phd2_ gene in articular chondrocytes accelerates differentiation and reduces articular cartilage thickness,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 45408, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Pfander, B. Swoboda, and T. Cramer, “The role of HIF-1alpha in maintaining cartilage homeostasis and during the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 104, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Pi, X. Zhang, Z. Shao, F. Zhao, X. Hu, and Y. Ao, “Intra-articular delivery of anti-Hif-2α siRNA by chondrocyte-homing nanoparticles to prevent cartilage degeneration in arthritic mice,” Gene Therapy, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 439–448, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Xu, H. Li, B. Wang et al., “VHL inactivation induces HEF1 and Aurora kinase a,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 2041–2046, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Yang, Y. Zhou, P. Cai et al., “Up-regulated HIF-2α contributes to the osteoarthritis development through mediating the primary cilia loss,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 75, article 105762, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. McGlashan, C. G. Jensen, and C. A. Poole, “Localization of extracellular matrix receptors on the chondrocyte primary cilium,” The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 1005–1014, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Hirose, Y. Okamoto, M. Yanoshita et al., “Protective effects of cilengitide on inflammation in chondrocytes under excessive mechanical stress,” Cell Biology International, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 966–974, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Kim, F. Ye, and M. H. Ginsberg, “Regulation of integrin activation,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 321–345, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Hafsia, M. Forien, F. Renaudin et al., “Galectin 3 deficiency alters chondrocyte primary cilium formation and exacerbates cartilage destruction via mitochondrial apoptosis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 21, no. 4, p. 1486, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. He, P. Nie, J. Lu et al., “Less mechanical loading attenuates osteoarthritis by reducing cartilage degeneration, subchondral bone remodelling, secondary inflammation, and activation of NLRP3 inflammasome,” Bone & Joint Research, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 731–741, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Satir and S. T. Christensen, “Overview of structure and function of mammalian cilia,” Annual Review of Physiology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 377–400, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. J. Haycraft and R. Serra, “Chapter 11 cilia involvement in patterning and maintenance of the skeleton,” Current Topics in Developmental Biology, vol. 85, pp. 303–332, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. F. Chang, G. Ramaswamy, and R. Serra, “Depletion of primary cilia in articular chondrocytes results in reduced Gli3 repressor to activator ratio, increased hedgehog signaling, and symptoms of early osteoarthritis,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 152–161, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. D. Sheffield, M. A. McGee, S. J. Glenn et al., “Osteoarthritis-like changes in Bardet-Biedl syndrome mutant ciliopathy mice (Bbs1M390R/M390R): evidence for a role of primary cilia in cartilage homeostasis and regulation of inflammation,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 9, p. 708, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. B. Kouri, S. A. Jiménez, M. Quintero, and A. Chico, “Ultrastructural study of chondrocytes from fibrillated and non-fibrillated human osteoarthritic cartilage,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 111–125, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Ruhlen and K. Marberry, “The chondrocyte primary cilium,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1071–1076, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. G. Jensen, C. A. Poole, S. R. McGlashan et al., “Ultrastructural, tomographic and confocal imaging of the chondrocyte primary cilium in situ,” Cell Biology International, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 101–110, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Haiqi Zhou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

245

Downloads

568

Citations

Stem Cells International

Novel Biological and Stem Cell-Based Management of Osteoarthritis

Primary Cilia: A Cellular Regulator of Articular Cartilage Degeneration

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. The Structure of Primary Cilia

3. The Material Transport of Primary Cilia

4. Chondrocyte Primary Cilia

5. Related Signaling Regulation Mechanisms of the Chondrocyte Primary Cilium and OA

5.1. Hedgehog Signaling Pathways

5.2. Wnt Signaling Pathways

5.3. IL-1β-Related Signaling Pathways

5.4. Hypoxia-Related Signaling Pathway

5.5. Other Signaling Pathways

6. Conclusions and Perspectives

Conflicts of Interest

Authors’ Contributions

Acknowledgments

References

Copyright