Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Scientifica
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 127562, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.6064/2012/127562
Research Article

Large-Scale Survey of Unselected Automated Visual Fields in a Major Reading Center: Patterns and Data Analysis

1Deptartment of Ophthalmology, MOR Institute for Medical Data, 51108 Bnei Brak, Israel
2Department of Ophthalmology, Wolfson Medical Center, 58100 Holon, Israel
3Department of Ophthalmology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, 49100 Petach Tikva, Israel
4Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
5Department of Epidemiology, Wolfson Medical Center, 58100 Holon, Israel

Received 20 March 2012; Accepted 9 May 2012

Academic Editors: R. Kröger and H. Noma

Copyright © 2012 Lilly Zborowski-Naveh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. C. Leske, A. Heijl, L. Hyman, and B. Bengtsson, “Early manifest glaucoma trial: design and baseline data,” Ophthalmology, vol. 106, no. 11, pp. 2144–2153, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. E. Gaasterland, F. Ederer, E. K. Sullivan, J. Caprioli, and M. N. Cyrlin, “Advanced glaucoma intervention study: 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability,” Ophthalmology, vol. 101, no. 8, pp. 1445–1455, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. A. Johnson, J. L. Keltner, K. E. Cello et al., “Baseline visual field characteristics in the ocular hypertension treatment study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 432–437, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. C. Musch, P. R. Lichter, K. E. Guire, and C. L. Standardi, “The collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study: study design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients,” Ophthalmology, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 653–662, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Heijl, G. Lindgren, and J. Olsson, “Perimetric threshold variability and age,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 450–452, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Heijl, M. C. Leske, B. Bengtsson et al., “Measuring visual field progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial,” Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 286–293, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. O. Gordon and M. A. Kass, “The ocular hypertension treatment study. Design and baseline description of the participants,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 573–583, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Israel Bureau of Statistics, 2004.
  9. J. M. Tielsch, A. Sommer, J. Katz, R. M. Royall, H. A. Quigley, and J. Javitt, “Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma: the Baltimore eye survey,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 266, no. 3, pp. 369–374, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. E. K. Klein, R. Klein, W. E. Sponsel et al., “Prevalence of glaucoma: the Beaver Dam Eye Study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 99, no. 10, pp. 1499–1504, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. Mitchell, W. Smith, K. Attebo, and P. R. Healey, “Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Australia: the blue mountains eye study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 103, no. 10, pp. 1661–1669, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. Hyman, S. Y. Wu, A. M. S. Connell et al., “Prevalence and causes of visual impairment in the Barbados Eye Study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 108, no. 10, pp. 1751–1756, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. A. Kahn, H. M. Leibowitz, J. P. Ganley et al., “The Framingham eye study. I. Outline and major prevalence findings,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 17–32, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. I. Dielemans, J. R. Vingerling, R. C. W. Wolfs, A. Hofman, D. E. Grobbee, and P. T. de Jong, “The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in a population-based study in The Netherlands. The Rotterdam Study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 101, no. 11, pp. 1851–1855, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Rodriguez, R. Sanchez, B. Munoz et al., “Causes of blindness and visual impairment in a population-based sample of U.S. Hispanics,” Ophthalmology, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 737–743, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. F. Delgado, N. T. A. Nguyen, T. A. Cox et al., “Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology,” Ophthalmology, vol. 109, no. 12, pp. 2362–2374, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Heijl and B. Bengtsson, “The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 19–22, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Matsuo, G. Tomita, Y. Suzuki, and M. Araie, “Learning effect and measurement variability in frequency-doubling technology perimetry in chronic open-angle glaucoma,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 467–473, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Iester, P. Capris, A. Pandolfo, M. Zingirian, and C. E. Traverso, “Learning effect, short-term fluctuation, and long-term fluctuation in frequency doubling technique,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 160–164, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. Koucheki, K. Nouri-Mahdavi, G. Patel, D. Gaasterland, and J. Caprioli, “Visual field changes after cataract extraction: the AGIS experience,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 138, no. 6, pp. 1022–1028, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. E. Gaasterland, F. Ederer, A. Beck et al., “The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 429–440, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. I. Goldberg, “Relationship between intraocular pressure and preservation of visual field in glaucoma,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 48, supplement 1, pp. S3–S7, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus