Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Scientifica
Volume 2012, Article ID 858037, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.6064/2012/858037
Review Article

Empirical and Theoretical Studies on Number Comparison: Design Parameters and Research Questions

1Center for Complex Systems and Brain Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA
2Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7160, USA

Received 8 May 2012; Accepted 28 May 2012

Academic Editors: P. Cavallari and P. N. Dannon

Copyright © 2012 Meltem Ballan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Dehaene and R. Akhavein, “Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 314–326, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. W. Galton, “Mental imaginary,” Forthnightly Review, vol. 28, pp. 312–324, 1880. View at Google Scholar
  3. F. Galton, “Visualised numerals,” Nature, vol. 21, no. 533, pp. 252–256, 1880. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. S. Moyer and T. K. Landauer, “Time required for judgements of numerical inequality,” Nature, vol. 215, no. 5109, pp. 1519–1520, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Dehaene, E. Dupoux, and J. Mehler, “Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 626–641, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Dehaene, S. Bossini, and P. Giraux, “The mental representation of parity and number magnitude,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 371–396, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Dehaene and J. Mehler, “Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words,” Cognition, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. McCloskey, A. Caramazza, and A. Basili, “Cognitive mechanisms in number processing and calculation: evidence from dyscalculia,” Brain and Cognition, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 171–196, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Dehaene, “Varieties of numerical abilities,” Cognition, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 1–42, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. I. D. Campbell, “Architectures for numerical cognition,” Cognition, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 1–44, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. F. Restle, “Speed of adding and comparing numbers,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 274–278, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. Cipolotti, E. K. Warrington, and B. Butterworth, “Selective impairment in manipulating arabic numerals,” Cortex, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 73–86, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. McCloskey, “Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: evidence from acquired dyscalculia,” Cognition, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 107–157, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. P. Noel and X. Seron, “Lexicalization errors in writing arabic numerals—a single-case study,” Brain and Cognition, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 151–179, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. McCloskey, P. Macaruso, and T. Whetstone, “Chapter 13 the functional architecture of numerical processing mechanisms: defending the modular model,” Advances in Psychology, vol. 91, no. C, pp. 493–537, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Henik and J. Tzelgov, “Is three greater than five: the relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks,” Memory and Cognition, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 389–395, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. Besner and M. Coltheart, “Ideographic and alphabetic processing in skilled reading of English,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 467–472, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. Fitousi and D. Algom, “Size congruity effects with two-digit numbers: expanding the number line?” Memory and Cognition, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 445–457, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. G. S. Foltz, S. E. Poltrock, and G. R. Potts, “Mental comparison of size and magnitude: size congruity effects,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 442–453, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. Borgmann, J. Fugelsang, D. Ansari, and D. Besner, “Congruency proportion reveals asymmetric processing of irrelevant physical and numerical dimensions in the size congruity paradigm,” Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 98–104, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  21. R. C. Kadosh and A. Henik, “A common representation for semantic and physical properties: a cognitive-anatomical approach,” Experimental Psychology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 87–94, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Dehaene, “The psychophysics of numerical comparison: a reexamination of apparently incompatible data,” Perception and Psychophysics, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 557–566, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. Burr and J. Ross, “A visual sense of number,” Current Biology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 425–428, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. F. H. Durgin, “Texture density adaptation and visual number revisited,” Current Biology, vol. 18, no. 18, pp. R855–R856, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. Nys and A. Content, “Judgement of discrete and continuous quantity in adults: number counts!,” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 675–690, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. W. Schwarz and A. Ischebeck, “Sequential effects in number comparison,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1606–1621, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. Naccache and S. Dehaene, “Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli,” Cognition, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 215–229, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. O. Neumann and W. Klotz, “Motor-responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli—where is the limit of direct parameter specification,” in Attention and Performance XV, C. Umiltá and M. Moscovitch, Eds., pp. 123–150, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  29. I. Stoianov, P. Kramer, C. Umiltà, and M. Zorzi, “Visuospatial priming of the mental number line,” Cognition, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 770–779, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. I. Campbell and S. G. Sacher, “Semantic alignment and number comparison,” Psychological Research, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 119–128, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. M. Sigman and S. Dehaene, “Parsing a cognitive task: a characterization of the mind's bottleneck,” PLoS Biology, vol. 3, no. 2, p. e37, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C. Oriet, M. Tombu, and P. Jolicœur, “Symbolic distance affects two processing loci in the number comparison task,” Memory and Cognition, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 913–926, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. Santens, S. Goossens, and T. Verguts, “Distance in motion: response trajectories reveal the dynamics of number comparison,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 9, Article ID e25429, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. J. H. Song and K. Nakayama, “Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 360–366, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. L. Goldfarb, A. Henik, O. Rubinsten, Y. Bloch-David, and L. Gertner, “The numerical distance effect is task dependent,” Memory & Cognition, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1508–1517, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. D. Ganor-Stern and J. Tzelgov, “Across-notation automatic numerical processing,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 430–437, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. T. Verguts and Van Opstal, “Dissociation of the distance effect and size effect in one-digit numbers,” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 925–930, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. E. Ratinckx and W. Fias, “Bilateral processing of redundant information: the influence of stimulus notation and processing speed in number comparison,” Cortex, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 207–218, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. H. C. Nuerk, B. E. Geppert, M. Van Herten, and K. Willmes, “On the impact of different number representations in the number bisection task,” Cortex, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 691–715, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. Van Herten, Number Processing, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 1999.
  41. E. M. Brannon, C. J. Wusthoff, C. R. Gallistel, and J. Gibbon, “Numerical subtraction in the pigeon: evidence for a linear subjective number scale,” Psychological Science, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 238–243, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. D. Ganor-Stern, M. Pinhas, and J. Tzelgov, “Comparing two-digit numbers: the importance of being presented together,” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 444–452, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. V. Hinrichs, D. S. Yurko, and J. M. Hu, “Two-digit number comparison: use of place information,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 890–901, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. H. C. Nuerk, U. Weger, and K. Willmes, “Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins,” Cognition, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. B25–B33, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. D. Ganor-Stern and J. Tzelgov, “Across-notation automatic processing of two-digit numbers,” Experimental Psychology, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 147–153, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. K. Moeller, S. Huber, H. C. Nuerk, and K. Willmes, “Two-digit number processing: holistic, decomposed or hybrid? A computational modelling approach,” Psychological Research, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 290–306, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. J. Zhang and H. Wang, “The effect of external representations on numeric tasks,” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 817–838, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. H. C. Nuerk, U. Weger, and K. Willmes, “On the perceptual generality of the unit-decade compatibility effect,” Experimental Psychology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 72–79, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. D. Ganor-Stern, J. Tzelgov, and R. Ellenbogen, “Automaticity and two-digit numbers,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 483–496, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. B. Butterworth, M. Zorzi, L. Girelli, and A. R. Jonckheere, “Storage and retrieval of addition facts: the role of number comparison,” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1005–1029, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. P. Charras, G. Brod, and J. Lupianez, “Is 26 + 26 smaller than 24 + 28? Estimating the approximate magnitude of repeated versus different numbers,” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 163–173, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. S. Ashkenazi, O. Rubinsten, and A. Henik, “Attention, automaticity, and developmental dyscalculia,” Neuropsychology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 535–540, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. R. Newman, “The dyscalculia sendrome,” 1998, http://www.dyscalculia.org/thesis.html.
  54. S. Carlomagno, A. Iavarone, G. Nolfe, G. Bourène, C. Martin, and G. Deloche, “Dyscalculia in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease,” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 166–174, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. L. Martini, F. Domahs, T. Benke, and M. Delazer, “Everyday numerical abilities in Alzeimer's disease,” Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 871–878, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus