Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Scientifica
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 579684, 24 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/579684
Review Article

Improving the Performance of Phase-Change Perfluorocarbon Droplets for Medical Ultrasonography: Current Progress, Challenges, and Prospects

Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of North Carolina and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

Received 10 February 2014; Accepted 2 April 2014; Published 1 June 2014

Academic Editor: Gaio Paradossi

Copyright © 2014 Paul S. Sheeran and Paul A. Dayton. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. L. Szabo, Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: Inside Out, Elsevier, 2004.
  2. M. Hashefi, “Ultrasound in the diagnosis of noninflammatory musculoskeletal conditions,” Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 74–90, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Mondillo, M. Galderisi, D. Mele et al., “Speckle-tracking echocardiography: a new technique for assessing myocardial function,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 71–83, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Youssef, G. Salsi, F. Bellussi et al., “Three-dimensional ultrasound is an accurate and reproducible technique for fetal crown-rump length measurement,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 220–227, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Tanter, J. Bercoff, A. Athanasiou et al., “Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1373–1386, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Bercoff, M. Tanter, and M. Fink, “Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 396–409, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. A. Lediju, G. E. Trahey, B. C. Byram, and J. J. Dahl, “Short-lag spatial coherence of backscattered echoes: imaging characteristics,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1377–1388, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. W. Smith, H. G. Pavy Jr., and O. T. von Ramm, “High-speed ultrasound volumetric imaging system I: transducer design and beam steering,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 100–108, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. Hynynen, N. McDannold, N. A. Sheikov, F. A. Jolesz, and N. Vykhodtseva, “Local and reversible blood-brain barrier disruption by noninvasive focused ultrasound at frequencies suitable for trans-skull sonications,” NeuroImage, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. Hynynen, “Ultrasound for drug and gene delivery to the brain,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 1209–1217, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. F. A. Jolesz and N. McDannold, “Current status and future potential of MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 391–399, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. R. Porter and F. Xie, “Transient myocardial contrast after initial exposure to diagnostic ultrasound pressures with minute doses of intravenously injected microbubbles: demonstration and potential mechanisms,” Circulation, vol. 92, no. 9, pp. 2391–2395, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. R. Wilson and P. N. Burns, “Microbubble-enhanced US in body imaging: what role?” Radiology, vol. 257, no. 1, pp. 24–39, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. B. Goldberg, J. S. Raichlen, and F. Forsberg, Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications, Martin Dunitz, London, UK, 2nd edition, 2001.
  15. K. H. Martin and P. A. Dayton, “Current status and prospects for microbubbles in ultrasound theranostics,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, vol. 5, pp. 329–345, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  16. K. Ferrara, R. Pollard, and M. Borden, “Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery,” Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 9, pp. 415–447, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. B. Mullin, L. C. Phillips, and P. A. Dayton, “Nanoparticle delivery enhancement with acoustically activated microbubbles,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, vol. 60, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  18. Definity [package insert], 2008.
  19. A. M. Spence, M. Muzi, M. M. Graham et al., “Glucose metabolism in human malignant gliomas measured quantitatively with PET, 1-[C-11]glucose and FDG: analysis of the FDG lumped constant,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 440–448, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. H. C. Roberts, T. P. L. Roberts, R. C. Brasch, and W. P. Dillon, “Quantitative measurement of microvascular permeability in human brain tumors achieved using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histologic grade,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 891–899, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H.-J. Weinmann, W. Ebert, B. Misselwitz, and H. Schmitt-Willich, “Tissue-specific MR contrast agents,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 33–44, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. L. Mullin, R. Gessner, J. Kwan, M. Kaya, M. A. Borden, and P. A. Dayton, “Effect of anesthesia carrier gas on in vivo circulation times of ultrasound microbubble contrast agents in rats,” Contrast Media and Molecular Imaging, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 126–131, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. S. Xu, J. Huang, R. Qin et al., “Synthesizing and binding dual-mode poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanobubbles for cancer targeting and imaging,” Biomaterials, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1716–1722, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Z. Xing, J. Wang, H. Ke et al., “The fabrication of novel nanobubble ultrasound contrast agent for potential tumor imaging,” Nanotechnology, vol. 21, no. 14, Article ID 145607, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. A. Wheatley, F. Forsberg, N. Dube, M. Patel, and B. E. Oeffinger, “Surfactant-stabilized contrast agent on the nanoscale for diagnostic ultrasound imaging,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 83–93, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. Patel, P. Dayton, J. Gut, E. Wisher, and K. W. Ferrara, “Optical and acoustical interrogation of submicron contrast agents,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 1641–1651, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. E. Stride and M. Edirisinghe, “Novel preparation techniques for controlling microbubble uniformity: a comparison,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 883–892, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. D. Tiukinhoy-Laing, S. Huang, M. Klegerman, C. K. Holland, and D. D. McPherson, “Ultrasound-facilitated thrombolysis using tissue-plasminogen activator-loaded echogenic liposomes,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 777–784, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. K. D. Buchanan, S. Huang, H. Kim, R. C. MacDonald, and D. D. McPherson, “Echogenic liposome compositions for increased retention of ultrasound reflectivity at physiologic temperature,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 2242–2249, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. O. D. Kripfgans, J. B. Fowlkes, D. L. Miller, O. P. Eldevik, and P. L. Carson, “Acoustic droplet vaporization for therapeutic and diagnostic applications,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1177–1189, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. P. S. Sheeran and P. A. Dayton, “Phase-change contrast agents for imaging and therapy,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 18, no. 15, pp. 2152–2165, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. O. D. Kripfgans, J. B. Fowlkes, D. L. Miller, O. P. Eldevik, and P. L. Carson, “Acoustic droplet vaporization for therapeutic and diagnostic applications,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1177–1189, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. F. Mattrey, “Perfluorooctylbromide: a new contrast agent for CT, sonography, and MR imaging,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 152, no. 2, pp. 247–252, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. R. F. Mattrey, “The potential role of perfluorochemicals (PFCS) in diagnostic imaging,” Artificial Cells, Blood Substitutes, and Immobilization Biotechnology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 295–313, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. E. G. Schutt, D. H. Klein, R. M. Mattrey, and J. G. Riess, “Injectable microbubbles as contrast agents for diagnostic ultrasound imaging: the key role of perfluorochemicals,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 42, no. 28, pp. 3218–3235, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. B. Campbell, “Tumor physiology and delivery of nanopharmaceuticals,” Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 503–512, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. K. Hobbs, W. L. Monsky, F. Yuan et al., “Regulation of transport pathways in tumor vessels: role of tumor type and microenvironment,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 4607–4612, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. N. Rapoport, “Phase-shift, stimuli-responsive perfluorocarbon nanodroplets for drug delivery to cancer,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, vol. 4, pp. 492–510, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  39. K. E. Wilson, T. Y. Wang, and J. K. Willmann, “Acoustic and photoacoustic molecular imaging of cancer,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 54, pp. 1851–1854, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  40. B. E. O'Neill and N. Rapoport, “Phase-shift, stimuli-responsive drug carriers for targeted delivery,” Therapeutic Delivery, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 1165–1187, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. R. E. Apfel, “Activatable infusable dispersions containing drops of a superheated liquid for methods of therapy and diagnosis,” US Patent 5840276, 1998.
  42. J. M. Correas and S. D. Quay, “EchoGen emulsion: a new ultrasound contrast agent based on phase shift colloids,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 51, supplement 1, pp. 11–14, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  43. N. Rapoport, Z. Gao, and A. Kennedy, “Multifunctional nanoparticles for combining ultrasonic tumor imaging and targeted chemotherapy,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 99, no. 14, pp. 1095–1106, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. T. Giesecke and K. Hynynen, “Ultrasound-mediated cavitation thresholds of liquid perfluorocarbon droplets in vitro,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1359–1365, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. N. Y. Rapoport, A. M. Kennedy, J. E. Shea, C. L. Scaife, and K.-H. Nam, “Controlled and targeted tumor chemotherapy by ultrasound-activated nanoemulsions/microbubbles,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 268–276, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. L. Fabiilli, K. J. Haworth, N. H. Fakhri, O. D. Kripfgans, P. L. Carson, and J. B. Fowlkes, “The role of inertial cavitation in acoustic droplet vaporization,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1006–1017, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. K. C. Schad and K. Hynynen, “In vitro characterization of perfluorocarbon droplets for focused ultrasound therapy,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 55, no. 17, pp. 4933–4947, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. W. G. Pitt, R. N. Singh, K. X. Perez, G. A. Husseini, and D. R. Jack, “Phase transitions of perfluorocarbon nanoemulsion induced with ultrasound: a mathematical model,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 21, pp. 879–891, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  49. P. Zhang and T. Porter, “An in vitro study of a phase-shift nanoemulsion: a potential nucleation agent for bubble-enhanced HIFU tumor ablation,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1856–1866, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. P. S. Sheeran, V. P. Wong, S. Luois et al., “Decafluorobutane as a phase-change contrast agent for low-energy extravascular ultrasonic imaging,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1518–1530, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. T. D. Martz, P. S. Sheeran, D. Bardin, A. P. Lee, and P. A. Dayton, “Precision manufacture of phase-change perfluorocarbon droplets using microfluidics,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1952–1957, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. N. Reznik, O. Shpak, E. Gelderblom et al., “The efficiency and stability of bubble formation by acoustic vaporization of submicron perfluorocarbon droplets,” Ultrasonics, vol. 53, pp. 1368–1376, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  53. O. Shpak, L. Stricker, M. Versluis, and D. Lohse, “The role of gas in ultrasonically driven vapor bubble growth,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 58, pp. 2523–2535, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  54. O. Couture, M. Faivre, N. Pannacci et al., “Ultrasound internal tattooing,” Medical Physics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1116–1123, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. K. Kawabata, N. Sugita, H. Yoshikawa, T. Azuma, and S. Umemura, “Nanoparticles with multiple perfluorocarbons for controllable ultrasonically induced phase shifting,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 44, article 5, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  56. T. A. Whittingham, “Contrast-specific imaging techniques: technical perspective,” in Contrast Media in Ultrasonography: Medical Radiology, pp. 43–70, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. O. D. Kripfgans, J. B. Fowlkes, M. Woydt, O. P. Eldevik, and P. L. Carson, “In vivo droplet vaporization for occlusion therapy and phase aberration correction,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 726–738, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. O. D. Kripfgans, M. L. Fabiilli, P. L. Carson, and J. B. Fowlkes, “On the acoustic vaporization of micrometer-sized droplets,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 272–281, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. A. H. Lo, O. D. Kripfgans, P. L. Carson, and J. B. Fowlkes, “Spatial control of gas bubbles and their effects on acoustic fields,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 95–106, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. D. Huh, J. H. Bahng, Y. Ling et al., “Gravity-driven microfluidic particle sorting device with hydrodynamic separation amplification,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 1369–1376, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. H. A. Nieuwstadt, R. Seda, D. S. Li, J. B. Fowlkes, and J. L. Bull, “Microfluidic particle sorting utilizing inertial lift force,” Biomedical Microdevices, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 97–105, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. J. A. Feshitan, C. C. Chen, J. J. Kwan, and M. A. Borden, “Microbubble size isolation by differential centrifugation,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 329, no. 2, pp. 316–324, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. S. L. Anna, N. Bontoux, and H. A. Stone, “Formation of dispersions using “flow focusing” in microchannels,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 364–366, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. K. Hettiarachchi, E. Talu, M. L. Longo, P. A. Dayton, and A. P. Lee, “On-chip generation of microbubbles as a practical technology for manufacturing contrast agents for ultrasonic imaging,” Lab on a Chip: Miniaturisation for Chemistry and Biology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 463–468, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. D. L. Miller, O. D. Kripfgans, J. B. Fowlkes, and P. L. Carson, “Cavitation nucleation agents for nonthermal ultrasound therapy,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 107, no. 6, pp. 3480–3486, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. M. Zhang, M. L. Fabiilli, K. J. Haworth et al., “Initial investigation of acoustic droplet vaporization for occlusion in canine kidney,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1691–1703, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. M. Zhang, M. L. Fabiilli, K. J. Haworth et al., “Acoustic droplet vaporization for enhancement of thermal ablation by high intensity focused ultrasound,” Academic Radiology, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1123–1132, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. D. Bardin, T. D. Martz, P. S. Sheeran, R. Shih, P. A. Dayton, and A. P. Lee, “High-speed, clinical-scale microfluidic generation of stable phase-change droplets for gas embolotherapy,” Lab on a Chip: Miniaturisation for Chemistry and Biology, vol. 11, no. 23, pp. 3990–3998, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. T. D. Martz, D. Bardin, P. S. Sheeran, A. P. Lee, and P. A. Dayton, “Microfluidic generation of acoustically active nanodroplets,” Small, vol. 8, pp. 1876–1879, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  70. S. L. Anna and H. C. Mayer, “Microscale tipstreaming in a microfluidic flow focusing device,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 18, no. 12, Article ID 121512, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. Y.-C. Tan and A. P. Lee, “Microfluidic separation of satellite droplets as the basis of a monodispersed micron and submicron emulsification system,” Lab on a Chip: Miniaturisation for Chemistry and Biology, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1178–1183, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. D. Bardin, M. R. Kendall, P. A. Dayton, and A. P. Lee, “Parallel generation of uniform fine droplets at hundreds of kilohertz in a flow-focusing module,” Biomicrofluidics, vol. 7, Article ID 034112, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. L. C. Clark Jr. and F. Gollan, “Survival of mammals breathing organic liquids equilibrated with oxygen at atmospheric pressure,” Science, vol. 152, no. 3730, pp. 1755–1756, 1966. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. B. P. Fuhrman, P. R. Paczan, and M. DeFrancisis, “Perfluorocarbon-associated gas exchange,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 712–722, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. C. J. Koch, P. R. Oprysko, A. L. Shuman, W. T. Jenkins, G. Brandt, and S. M. Evans, “Radiosensitization of hypoxic tumor cells by dodecafluoropentane: a gas-phase perfluorochemical emulsion,” Cancer Research, vol. 62, no. 13, pp. 3626–3629, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. P. S. Sheeran, S. Luois, P. A. Dayton, and T. O. Matsunaga, “Formulation and acoustic studies of a new phase-shift agent for diagnostic and therapeutic ultrasound,” Langmuir, vol. 27, no. 17, pp. 10412–10420, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. P. S. Sheeran, S. H. Luois, L. B. Mullin, T. O. Matsunaga, and P. A. Dayton, “Design of ultrasonically-activatable nanoparticles using low boiling point perfluorocarbons,” Biomaterials, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 3262–3269, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. S. Hernot and A. L. Klibanov, “Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 1153–1166, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. R. Gessner and P. A. Dayton, “Advances in molecular imaging with Ultrasound,” Molecular Imaging, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 117–127, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. L. C. Phillips, C. Puett, P. S. Sheeran, G. Wilson Miller, T. O. Matsunaga, and P. A. Dayton, “Phase-shift perfluorocarbon agents enhance high intensity focused ultrasound thermal delivery with reduced near-field heating,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 134, pp. 1473–1482, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  81. J. J. Choi, J. A. Feshitan, B. Baseri et al., “Microbubble-size dependence of focused ultrasound-induced bloodBrain barrier opening in mice in vivo,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 145–154, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. J. E. Streeter, R. Gessner, I. Miles, and P. A. Dayton, “Improving sensitivity in ultrasound molecular imaging by tailoring contrast agent size distribution: in vivo studies,” Molecular Imaging, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 87–95, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. O. Shpak, M. Verweij, H. J. Vos, N. de Jong, D. Lohse, and M. Versluis, “Acoustic droplet vaporization is initiated by superharmonic focusing,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 5, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  84. N. Reznik, G. Lajoinie, O. Shpak et al., “On the acoustic properties of vaporized submicron perfluorocarbon droplets,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1379–1384, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  85. S. Sirsi, C. Pae, D. K. Taek Oh et al., “Lung surfactant microbubbles,” Soft Matter, vol. 5, no. 23, pp. 4835–4842, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. A. L. Martin, M. Seo, R. Williams, G. Belayneh, F. S. Foster, and N. Matsuura, “Intracellular growth of nanoscale perfluorocarbon droplets for enhanced ultrasound-induced phase-change conversion,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 38, pp. 1799–1810, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  87. E. Vlaisavljevich, Y. Durmaz, A. Maxwell, M. ElSayed, and Z. Xu, “Nanodroplet-mediated histotripsy for image-guided targeted ultrasound cell ablation,” Theranostics, vol. 3, pp. 851–864, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  88. M. Seo and N. Matsuura, “Monodisperse, submicrometer droplets via condensation of microfluidic-generated gas bubbles,” Small, vol. 8, pp. 2704–2714, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  89. A. E. Forbrich, T. J. Harrison, R. Paproski, and R. J. Zemp, “Realtime flash-difference ultrasound imaging of phase-change perfluorocarbon nanodroplet activation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS '12), pp. 687–690, Dresden, Germany, 2012.
  90. R. J. Paproski and R. J. Zemp, “Comparing nanodroplets and microbubbles for enhanced ultrasound-mediated gene transfection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS '13), pp. 65–67, Prague, Czech Republic, 2013.
  91. P. S. Sheeran, T. O. Matsunaga, and P. A. Dayton, “Phase-transition thresholds and vaporization phenomena for ultrasound phase-change nanoemulsions assessed via high-speed optical microscopy,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 58, article 4513, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  92. S. Xu, Y. Zong, W. Li, S. Zhang, and M. Wan, “Bubble size distribution in acoustic droplet vaporization via dissolution using an ultrasound wide-beam method,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 21, pp. 975–983, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  93. P. S. Sheeran, T. O. Matsunaga, and P. A. Dayton, “Phase change events of volatile liquid perfluorocarbon contrast agents produce unique acoustic signatures,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 59, article 379, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  94. R. Asami, T. Ikeda, T. Azuma, S. Umemura, and K. Kawabata, “Acoustic signal characterization of phase change nanodroplets in tissue-mimicking phantom gels,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 49, no. 7, Article ID 07HF16, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. N. Reznik, R. Williams, and P. N. Burns, “Investigation of vaporized submicron perfluorocarbon droplets as an ultrasound contrast agent,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1271–1279, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. M. A. Ainslie and T. G. Leighton, “Review of scattering and extinction cross-sections, damping factors, and resonance frequencies of a spherical gas bubble,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 3184–3208, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. A. Qamar, Z. Z. Wong, J. B. Fowlkes, and J. L. Bull, “Dynamics of acoustic droplet vaporization in gas embolotherapy,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 96, no. 14, Article ID 143702, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. C.-H. Wang, S.-T. Kang, Y.-H. Lee, Y.-L. Luo, Y.-F. Huang, and C.-K. Yeh, “Aptamer-conjugated and drug-loaded acoustic droplets for ultrasound theranosis,” Biomaterials, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1939–1947, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. P. S. Sheeran, J. E. Streeter, L. B. Mullin, T. O. Matsunaga, and P. Dayton, “Toward ultrasound molecular imaging with phase-change contrast agents: an in vitro proof of principle,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 39, pp. 893–902, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  100. C. C. Coussios, C. H. Farny, G. ter Haar, and R. A. Roy, “Role of acoustic cavitation in the delivery and monitoring of cancer treatment by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU),” International Journal of Hyperthermia, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 105–120, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. Z. Kyriakou, M. I. Corral-Baques, A. Amat, and C.-C. Coussios, “HIFU-induced cavitation and heating in ex vivo porcine subcutaneous fat,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 568–579, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. C. Puett, L. Phillips, P. Sheeran, and P. Dayton, “In vitro parameter optimization for spatial control of focused ultrasound ablation when using low boiling point phase-change nanoemulsions,” Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound, vol. 1, article 16, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  103. L. C. Phillips, P. S. Sheeran, C. Puett et al., “Dual perfluorocarbon nanodroplets enhance high intensity focused ultrasound heating and extend therapeutic window in vivo,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 134, no. 5, p. 4049, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  104. G. Samiotaki, F. Vlachos, Y.-S. Tung, and E. E. Konofagou, “A quantitative pressure and microbubble-size dependence study of focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening reversibility in vivo using MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 769–777, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. N. J. McDannold, N. I. Vykhodtseva, and K. Hynynen, “Microbubble contrast agent with focused ultrasound to create brain lesions at low power levels: MR imaging and histologic study in rabbits,” Radiology, vol. 241, no. 1, pp. 95–106, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. Y.-S. Tung, F. Vlachos, J. J. Choi, T. Deffieux, K. Selert, and E. E. Konofagou, “In vivo transcranial cavitation threshold detection during ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening in mice,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 55, no. 20, pp. 6141–6155, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. C. C. Chen, P. S. Sheeran, S.-Y. Wu, O. O. Olumolade, P. A. Dayton, and E. E. Konofagou, “Targeted drug delivery with focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening using acoustically-activated nanodroplets,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 172, pp. 795–804, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  108. Y.-S. Tung, F. Vlachos, J. A. Feshitan, M. A. Borden, and E. E. Konofagou, “The mechanism of interaction between focused ultrasound and microbubbles in blood-brain barrier opening in mice,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 3059–3067, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. O. Couture, A. Urban, A. Bretagne, L. Martinez, M. Tanter, and P. Tabeling, “In vivo targeted delivery of large payloads with an ultrasound clinical scanner,” Medical Physics, vol. 39, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  110. A. L. Klibanov, “Targeted delivery of gas-filled microspheres, contrast agents for ultrasound imaging,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 37, no. 1–3, pp. 139–157, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. J. K. Willmann, Z. Cheng, C. Davis et al., “Targeted microbubbles for imaging tumor angiogenesis: assessment of whole-body biodistribution with dynamic micro-pet in Mice,” Radiology, vol. 249, no. 1, pp. 212–219, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. G. M. Lanza, P. M. Winter, S. D. Caruthers et al., “Theragnostics for tumor and plaque angiogenesis with perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions,” Angiogenesis, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 189–202, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus