Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Scientifica
Volume 2015, Article ID 235184, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/235184
Research Article

Effects of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in a Pig and Human Epithelial Intestinal Cell Model

1Institute of Veterinary Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany
2Institute of Microbiology and Epizootics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany
3Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, 01968 Senftenberg, Germany

Received 18 December 2014; Accepted 5 March 2015

Academic Editor: Michael H. Kogut

Copyright © 2015 Ulrike Lodemann et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. C. Kyriakis, V. K. Tsiloyiannis, J. Vlemmas et al., “The effect of probiotic LSP 122 on the control of post-weaning diarrhoea syndrome of piglets,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 223–228, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. Alexopoulos, A. Karagiannidis, S. K. Kritas, C. Boscos, I. E. Georgoulakis, and S. C. Kyriakis, “Field Evaluation of a Bioregulator Containing Live Bacillus cereus Spores on Health Status and Performance of Sows and their Litters,” Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series A: Physiology Pathology Clinical Medicine, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 137–145, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Kirchgessner, F. X. Roth, U. Eidelsburger, and B. Gedek, “The nutritive efficiency of Bacillus cereus as a probiotic in the raising of piglets. 1. Effect on the growth parameters and gastrointestinal environment,” Archiv für Tierernährung, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 111–121, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. Taras, W. Vahjen, M. Macha, and O. Simon, “Performance, diarrhea incidence, and occurrence of Escherichia coli virulence genes during long-term administration of a probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain to sows and piglets,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 608–617, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Zeyner and E. Boldt, “Effects of a probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain supplemented from birth to weaning on diarrhoea patterns and performance of piglets,” Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, vol. 90, no. 1-2, pp. 25–31, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. Scharek, J. Guth, K. Reiter et al., “Influence of a probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain on development of the immune system of sows and piglets,” Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 105, no. 1-2, pp. 151–161, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. Scharek, J. Guth, M. Filter, and M. F. G. Schmidt, “Impact of the probiotic bacteria Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 (SF68) and Bacillus cereus var. toyoi NCIMB 40112 on the development of serum IgG and faecal IgA of sows and their piglets,” Archives of Animal Nutrition, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 223–234, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. J. Broom, H. M. Miller, K. G. Kerr, and J. S. Knapp, “Effects of zinc oxide and Enterococcus faecium SF68 dietary supplementation on the performance, intestinal microbiota and immune status of weaned piglets,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 45–54, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. U. Lodemann, K. Hübener, N. Jansen, and H. Martens, “Effects of Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 as probiotic supplement on intestinal transport and barrier function of piglets,” Archives of Animal Nutrition, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 35–48, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Czerucka, I. Roux, and P. Rampal, “Saccharomyces boulardii inhibits secretagogue-mediated adenosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate induction in intestinal cells,” Gastroenterology, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. A. Zyrek, C. Cichon, S. Helms, C. Enders, U. Sonnenborn, and M. A. Schmidt, “Molecular mechanisms underlying the probiotic effects of Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 involve ZO-2 and PKCzeta redistribution resulting in tight junction and epithelial barrier repair,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 804–816, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Dahan, G. Dalmasso, V. Imbert, J.-F. Peyron, P. Rampal, and D. Czerucka, “Saccharomyces boulardii interferes with enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli-induced signaling pathways in T84 cells,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 766–773, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. M. Kandil, R. A. Argenzio, W. Chen et al., “L-glutamine and L-asparagine stimulate ODC activity and proliferation in a porcine jejunal enterocyte line,” The American Journal of Physiology—Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 269, no. 4, part 1, pp. G591–G599, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. M. Rhoads, W. Chen, P. Chu, H. M. Berschneider, R. A. Argenzio, and A. M. Paradiso, “L-Glutamine and L-asparagine stimulate Na+-H+ exchange in porcine jejunal enterocytes,” The American Journal of Physiology—Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 266, no. 5, pp. G828–G838, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. Schierack, M. Nordhoff, M. Pollmann et al., “Characterization of a porcine intestinal epithelial cell line for in vitro studies of microbial pathogenesis in swine,” Histochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 293–305, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Marciňáková, T. D. Klingberg, A. Lauková, and B. B. Budde, “The effect of pH, bile and calcium on the adhesion ability of probiotic enterococci of animal origin to the porcine jejunal epithelial cell line IPEC-J2,” Anaerobe, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 120–124, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Bevilacqua, C. Altieri, M. R. Corbo, M. Sinigaglia, and L. I. I. Ouoba, “Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from italian bella di cerignola table olives: selection of potential multifunctional starter cultures,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 75, no. 8, pp. M536–M544, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. van der Aa Kühle, K. Skovgaard, and L. Jespersen, “In vitro screening of probiotic properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii and food-borne Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 29–39, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. Schierack, S. Kleta, K. Tedin et al., “E. coli Nissle 1917 affects Salmonella adhesion to porcine intestinal epithelial cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 2, Article ID e14712, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. A. Skjolaas, T. E. Burkey, S. S. Dritz, and J. E. Minton, “Effects of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, or serovar Choleraesuis, Lactobacillus reuteri and Bacillus licheniformis on chemokine and cytokine expression in the swine jejunal epithelial cell line, IPEC-J2,” Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 115, no. 3-4, pp. 299–308, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. T. Botić, T. D. Klingberg, H. Weingartl, and A. Cencič, “A novel eukaryotic cell culture model to study antiviral activity of potential probiotic bacteria,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 227–234, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Michail and F. Abernathy, “Lactobacillus plantarum reduces the in vitro secretory response of intestinal epithelial cells to enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection,” Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 350–355, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. N. Parassol, M. Freitas, K. Thoreux, G. Dalmasso, R. Bourdet-Sicard, and P. Rampal, “Lactobacillus casei DN-114 001 inhibits the increase in paracellular permeability of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli-infected T84 cells,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 256–262, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. Varma, K. R. Dinesh, K. K. Menon, and R. Biswas, “Lactobacillus fermentum isolated from human colonic mucosal biopsy inhibits the growth and adhesion of enteric and foodborne pathogens,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 75, no. 9, pp. M546–M551, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. H. Putaala, R. Barrangou, G. J. Leyer et al., “Analysis of the human intestinal epithelial cell transcriptional response to Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius, Bifidobacterium lactis and Escherichia coli,” Beneficial Microbes, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 283–295, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. RestaLenert and K. E. Barrett, “Enteroinvasive bacteria alter barrier and transport properties of human intestinal epithelium: role of iNOS and COX-2,” Gastroenterology, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 1070–1087, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. G. Wilson, I. F. Hassan, C. J. Dix et al., “Transport and permeability properties of human Caco-2 cells: an in vitro model of the intestinal epithelial cell barrier,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 11, no. 1–3, pp. 25–40, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. I. J. Hidalgo, T. J. Raub, and R. T. Borchardt, “Characterization of the human colon carcinoma cell line (Caco-2) as a model system for intestinal epithelial permeability,” Gastroenterology, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 736–749, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. H. von Bonsdorff, S. D. Fuller, and K. Simons, “Apical and basolateral endocytosis in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells grown on nitrocellulose filters.,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 2781–2792, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. B. Ewaschuk, H. Diaz, L. Meddings et al., “Secreted bioactive factors from Bifidobacterium infantis enhance epithelial cell barrier function,” The American Journal of Physiology—Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 295, no. 5, pp. G1025–G1034, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J.-M. Otte and D. K. Podolsky, “Functional modulation of enterocytes by gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms,” American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 286, no. 4, pp. G613–G626, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. Resta-Lenert and K. E. Barrett, “Live probiotics protect intestinal epithelial cells from the effects of infection with enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC),” Gut, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 988–997, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. P. M. Sherman, K. C. Johnson-Henry, H. P. Yeung, P. S. C. Ngo, J. Goulet, and T. A. Tompkins, “Probiotics reduce enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7- and enteropathogenic E. coli O127:H6-induced changes in polarized T84 epithelial cell monolayers by reducing bacterial adhesion and cytoskeletal rearrangements,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 73, no. 8, pp. 5183–5188, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. Czerucka, S. Dahan, B. Mograbi, B. Rossi, and P. Rampal, “Saccharomyces boulardii preserves the barrier function and modulates the signal transduction pathway induced in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli-infected T84 cells,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 5998–6004, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. T. D. Klingberg, M. H. Pedersen, A. Cencic, and B. B. Budde, “Application of measurements of transepithelial electrical resistance of intestinal epithelial cell monolayers to evaluate probiotic activity,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 7528–7530, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. K. Madsen, A. Cornish, P. Soper et al., “Probiotic bacteria enhance murine and human intestinal epithelial barrier function,” Gastroenterology, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 580–591, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. M. Geens and T. A. Niewold, “Preliminary characterization of the transcriptional response of the porcine intestinal cell line IPEC-J2 to enterotoxigenic escherichia coli, escherichia coli, and E. coli lipopolysaccharide,” Comparative and Functional Genomics, vol. 2010, Article ID 469583, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. M. Roselli, A. Finamore, I. Garaguso, M. S. Britti, and E. Mengheri, “Zinc oxide protects cultured enterocytes from the damage induced by Escherichia coli,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 133, no. 12, pp. 4077–4082, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. R. C. Anderson, A. L. Cookson, W. C. McNabb, W. J. Kelly, and N. C. Roy, “Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 2648 is a potential probiotic that enhances intestinal barrier function,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 309, no. 2, pp. 184–192, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. L. Roxas, A. Koutsouris, and V. K. Viswanathan, “Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli-induced epidermal growth factor receptor activation contributes to physiological alterations in intestinal epithelial cells,” Infection and immunity, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 2316–2324, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. M. Roselli, A. Finamore, M. S. Britti et al., “The novel porcine Lactobacillus sobrius strain protects intestinal cells from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 infection and prevents membrane barrier damage,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 137, no. 12, pp. 2709–2716, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. P. Mangell, P. Nejdfors, M. Wang et al., “Lactobacillus plantarum 299v inhibits Escherichia coli-induced intestinal permeability,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 511–516, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. M. Geens and T. A. Niewold, “Optimizing culture conditions of a porcine epithelial cell line IPEC-J2 through a histological and physiological characterization,” Cytotechnology, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 415–423, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus