Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Scientifica
Volume 2015, Article ID 578676, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/578676
Research Article

An Improved Micropropagation Protocol by Ex Vitro Rooting of Passiflora edulis Sims. f. flavicarpa Deg. through Nodal Segment Culture

Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Plant Science, M.G.G.A.C., Mahe, Pondicherry 673311, India

Received 14 June 2015; Accepted 7 July 2015

Academic Editor: Karl-Josef Dietz

Copyright © 2015 Mahipal S. Shekhawat et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

A procedure for rapid clonal propagation of Passiflora edulis Sims. f. flavicarpa Deg. (Passifloraceae) has been developed in this study. Nodal explants were sterilized with 0.1% HgCl2 and inoculated on Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal medium. The addition of 2.0 mgL−1 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) to MS medium caused an extensive proliferation of multiple shoots () primordial from the nodal meristems. Subculturing of these multiple shoots on the MS medium augmented with 1.0 mgL−1 of each BAP and Kinetin (Kin) was successful for the multiplication of the shoots in vitro with maximum numbers of shoots () within four weeks of incubation. Shoots were rooted best ( roots/shoots) on half strength MS medium supplemented with 2.0 mgL−1 indole-3 butyric acid (IBA). All in vitro regenerated shoots were rooted by ex vitro method, and this has achieved 6-7 roots per shoot by pulsing of cut ends of the shoots using 200 as well as 300 mgL−1 IBA. The plantlets were hardened in the greenhouse for 4-5 weeks. The hardened plantlets were shifted to manure containing nursery polybags after five weeks and then transferred to a sand bed for another four weeks for acclimatization before field planting with 88% survival rate.

1. Introduction

Passiflora edulis Sims f. flavicarpa Deg. (passion fruit) is an important species of the family Passifloraceae, distributed mainly in the tropical and the subtropical regions of the world. It is native to Brazil and the fruits are mainly used for processing of juice. The fruits are famous for aromatic flavor and rich nutritional and medicinal properties. These are well known for their delicious juice, considered to be an instant energy drink in many parts of the world, particularly in South America, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa [1].

Passion fruit vines are found wild and cultivated also to some extent in many parts of the world. In Brazil, it is cultivated at commercial scale and the fruits are consumed as juices and in ice cream making [2]. The cultivation of passion fruit has also been taken up at commercial scale in North-East and South India to produce value-added products and to generate extra income for the farmers. It can be grown as intercrop during any seasons. Flowers are hermaphrodites and are violet or blue to pale violet colored, in axillary solitary cymes [3].

P. edulis yields essential oils used in perfumery and soap industry, and the products derived from this plant are internationally recognized as herbal medicines [4]. This species is used in several pharmaceutical preparations in Brazil. The Italian chemists have extracted passiflorine from the air-dried leaves of P. edulis. The fruits contain vital antioxidants found to inhibit the growth of cancer cells [3]. In Madeira, the juice of passion fruits is given as digestive stimulant and to treat gastric cancer [5].

Passion fruit is rich in saponins, alkaloids, tannins, flavonoids, vitamins, and free amino acids, namely, arginine, aspartic acid, glycine, leucine, lysine, proline, threonine, tyrosine, and valine. The seeds yield 23% oil which is similar to sunflower and soybean oil and have industrial uses. It is also known to possess antibacterial, antiseptic, astringent, antiulcer, anti-inflammatory, spermicidal, and anticancer properties [6, 7].

Passion fruit species are normally propagated through seeds and stem cuttings. The vegetative propagation method (through stem cuttings) is most popular all over the world to maintain all essential superior characters of the genotype like disease resistance, size of fruit, juice content, time of maturity, and so forth. But this vine is affected by several viral, bacterial, and fungal diseases which caused heavy loss to the growers [8]. The vegetative propagation method causes the carry-over of disease-causing microorganisms from mother plant to the next generation [9]. Efficient micropropagation protocol for Passiflora species and its hybrids may play an important role in the production of healthy and disease-free stock plant material which can be used as source of medicinal herbal products, nutritional fruits, and ornamental flowers [10].

Biotechnology methods with selection of shoot apical and nodal meristems as source of explants can be used for rapid multiplication for improved varieties and to produce disease free quality planting material [11]. Some earlier work is available on this medicinal plant species [10, 1216]. The present study describes an efficient protocol in terms of number of shoots induced from each node of explants, number of shoots multiplied, success in ex vitro rooting, and higher rate of survival of plantlets under natural conditions after hardening in the greenhouse.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Source Plant and Explant Collection

Explanting material of Passiflora edulis Sims f. flavicarpa Deg. was collected from the Coromandel Coastal Region of South India (including Tamil Nadu and Puducherry) during the months of February to December, 2013. Healthy, soft, and juvenile branches were collected from a one-year-old vine and brought to the laboratory. The leaves were excised and the stem (nodal segments) was cut into segments (2-3 cm long), each with at least one node.

2.2. Pretreatment and Surface Sterilization

The explants were pretreated with 0.1% (w/v) Bavistin (a systemic fungicide; BASF India Ltd., India) solution, and subsequently the surface was sterilized with 0.1% (w/v) HgCl2 (disinfectant, Himedia, India) solution for 5 min to check fungal and bacterial contamination, respectively. After rinsing five to six times with sterile distilled water, the explants were dipped in 90% ethyl alcohol. The sterilized explants were inoculated vertically onto the culture medium under laminar air flow cabinet (Technico Pvt. Ltd., Chennai, India).

2.3. Culture Medium, Culture Conditions, and Initiation of Multiple Shoots

Murashige and Skoog [17] medium (MS) was used as basal medium in the present study which was supplemented with 3% (w/v) sucrose and 0.8% (w/v) agar (Himedia, India). MS medium augmented with BAP and Kin ranging from 1.0 to 5.0 mgL−1 was used for the initiation of the shoots from nodal meristem of the explants. The pH of the media was adjusted to 5.8 using either 0.1 N NaOH or 0.1 N HCl prior to autoclaving the medium. Ten mL of medium (10 replicates) was poured in each culture tube. All the experiments were repeated thrice. The cultures were incubated under a 12 h photoperiod in cool white fluorescent light (44-45 μmol m−2 s−1 Spectral Flux Photon, SFP) intensity.

2.4. Multiplication of Shoots

The shoots regenerated in vitro from the meristem of nodal explants were used for further multiplication of the shoots. The cultures were multiplied by two approaches: (i) the mother explants were repetitively transferred to fresh medium for 2-3 passages after harvesting in vitro raised shoots and (ii) the in vitro produced shoots were cut into 2–4 cm long segments (each with at least 1-2 nodes) and subcultured on fresh medium. The MS medium supplemented with cytokinins (BAP and Kin) ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 mgL−1 was used for multiplication of shoots. About 100 mL of medium (10 replicates) was poured in each culture flask. All the experiments were repeated thrice. The cultures were maintained at °C temperature and 40–45 μmol m−2 s−1 SFP light under 12:12 hrs light: dark photoperiod. Regular subculturing was performed after every four to five weeks.

2.5. Induction of Roots from the Shoots

The elongated in vitro produced shoots (3–5 cm long) were excised from the 4-week-old cultures and used for rooting experiments. The excised shoots were transferred to 1/4th, half and full strength agar-gelled MS basal medium supplemented with different concentrations of IBA and α-Naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) ranging from 0.5 to 3.0 mgL−1 to induce roots in vitro. Ten mL of this medium with 10 replicates was poured in each culture tube for root induction from the cut end of the shoots. Culture conditions were the same as for shoot multiplication except for the intensity of light (diffused light of 15–20 μmol m−2s−1 SFP).

2.6. Ex Vitro Root Induction from the In Vitro Raised Shoots

Experiments were conducted to achieve rooting and hardening simultaneously using ex vitro method to save energy, cost of production, and time. The shoots were treated with IBA and NAA (50 to 500 mgL−1) solutions for five min and transferred to the ecofriendly plain paper cups (size 150 mL; Vandana Paper Products, Chennai, India) containing 55 g autoclaved soilrite (a mixture of perlite, Irish Peat Moss, and exfoliated vermiculite; KelPerlite, Bangalore, India), moistened with 10 mL aqueous 1/4th MS salts solution by the interval of one week and maintained in the greenhouse for five weeks. The experimental cups were kept in the greenhouse for root induction as well as hardening of the plantlets simultaneously.

2.7. Hardening and Acclimatization of Plantlets

After one month, the in vitro rooted shoots were taken out from the medium and washed with autoclaved distilled water to remove all traces of medium and agar gel. These individual plantlets were transferred to paper cups containing soilrite which was covered with transparent plastic cups (size 200 mL; Swastik PolyPack, Chennai, India) in inverted position. These setups were placed in the greenhouse for acclimatization and hardening. After optimizing the growth of the rooted plantlets, these were transferred to nursery polybags containing garden soil, organic matter, soilrite, and sand (1 : 1 : 1 : 1).

2.8. Statistical Data Analyses

The experiments were completely carried out with 10 replicates and repeated thrice. Data were subjected to analysis of variance by ANOVA and the significance of differences was calculated by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test using SPSS software (version 16.0).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Establishment of Cultures

Shoot bud initiation from nodal meristems of explants occurred after five-six days of inoculation. Fresh but thick shoot segments were found most suitable for culture initiation. All the nodal segments (100%) were sterilized with 0.1% HgCl2 solution. It was difficult to sterilized mature explants which were collected during the months of April to June and took more time (4-5 weeks) to initiate the shoot buds from the nodal meristems in cultures. Numerous shoots ( shoots per explant) with 2-3 cm length were reported on MS medium supplemented with 2.0 mgL−1 BAP (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). A less number of shoots (3-4 shoots per explant) were differentiated on MS medium augmented with Kin (Table 1). Among the cytokinins, BAP was reported to be the most appropriate for initiation of cultures with MS medium. The rejuvenation of meristem was achieved through selection of explants and by treatment of different cytokinins. Ragavendran et al. [16] used node and shoot tip explants of P. foetida and regenerated 1-2 shoots per explant on MS medium supplemented with BAP.

Table 1: Effect of cytokinins (BAP and Kin) on induction of shoots from explants of P. edulis after 4 weeks.
Figure 1: (a) Initiation of shoots from the nodal meristem. (b) Multiple shoots from the explants on MS medium with BAP. (c) Multiplication of shoots after two weeks. (d) Multiplication of shoots after four to five weeks.

In vitro propagation by nodal cuttings promoted the development of a preexistent morphological structure, and the nutritional and hormonal conditions of the medium break the dormancy of the axillary bud which promoted its rapid development [18]. Organogenesis in passion fruit has also been reported by some researchers [19, 20], culturing different types of explants in media supplemented with BAP. In vitro multiplication of Passiflora edulis by direct organogenesis through nodal cuttings was based on the concept that the higher the number of nodes the higher the number of plantlets. Trevisan and Mendes [15] studied the development of adventitious buds from the leaf discs on BAP or Thidiazuron (TDZ) and reported 5.6 shoots on BAP + coconut water containing medium. Effectiveness of BAP over Kin for shoot initiation from the buds has been reported in a number of other plant species like Ceropegia bulbosa [21], Momordica dioica [22], Leptadenia reticulata [23], and Turnera ulmifolia [24].

3.2. Multiplication of Shoots In Vitro

The shoots were multiplied by repeated transfer of mother explants of P. edulis on MS medium fortified with 1.0 mgL−1 of each BAP and Kin. This process of shoot amplification has been adopted by many researchers [21, 25, 26]. On adopting this process, shoots per vessel were produced after 2-3 passages (Table 2). This media composition was found good for shoot elongation also. Dornelas and Vieira [19] multiplied P. edulis shoots on MS medium supplemented with BAP or BAP + NAA. Hall et al. [20] used BAP + coconut water to culture and multiply the shoots of passion fruit. However, TDZ has also been reported as effective growth regulator for adventitious shoot multiplication in several crop plants [2729]. Drew [12] cultured axillary buds of different Passiflora species on MS medium supplemented with BAP, 2iP (N6-iso pentenyl adenine), or IAA and developed some shoots. The protocol reported here improved the number of shoots multiplied in vitro per explant and thus shows higher efficiency than previously employed methods.

Table 2: Effect of cytokinins (BAP and Kin) after 4 weeks on multiplication of shoots.

The shoots and leaves of the in vitro multiplied shoots were small in the first and second weeks of the incubation (Figure 1(c)) but the size of leaves was enlarged and the shoots were elongated in the last two weeks (Figure 1(d)). Well-developed leaf-system supports the chances of survival of in vitro raised plantlets during hardening and field transfer [30]. Plantlets with a high number of well-developed leaves are more efficient photosynthetically and therefore adapt quickly to natural environment as compared to those with smaller and fewer leaves [31].

After the establishment of cultures in vitro, some of the MS medium contents (e.g., sucrose) were replaced by cheaper materials available in the local market. This could be achieved through the use of locally available, cost effective alternatives like sugar cubes and sugar crystals in the place of sucrose [22]. It was reported that the number of shoots multiplied were remain more or less same with the alternate source of carbon in present study.

3.3. In Vitro Rooting of Microshoots

Roots have an essential role in plant growth and development in supplying water and nutrients to the plant from the environment [32]. About 98% of the shoots were rooted on strength of MS medium supplemented with IBA. IBA was reported most effective in induction of roots from the cut ends of the shoots in present study. About 63% and 82% of the shoots, with less number of roots, were rooted on full and 1/4 strength MS medium, respectively (Table 3). Callus formation (moderate) was also observed when the shoots were rooted with full strength MS medium supplemented with 2.0 mgL−1 IBA. Maximum number of shoots was reported on half strength MS medium supplemented with 2.0 mgL−1 IBA (Figure 2(a)). Each shoot produced roots within 3-4 weeks on this medium combination (Table 4). The highest percentage of shoots (73%) was rooted on NAA with less number of roots (5.8). Our result signifies that half strength of MS salts in medium is appropriate for in vitro rooting and is in line with the research work published by many authors [3335]. Ragavendran et al. [16] also rooted in vitro raised shoots by use of IBA in case of P. foetida.

Table 3: Effect of strength of MS medium augmented with 2.0 mgL−1 IBA on in vitro root initiation from shoots of P. edulis after 4 weeks.
Table 4: Effect of auxins (IBA, NAA) on in vitro root induction from in vitro raised shoots after 4 weeks.
Figure 2: (a) In vitro root induction from the shoots on half strength MS medium with IBA. (b) Ex vitro root formation in the greenhouse after four weeks.
3.4. Ex Vitro Root Induction

We reported 100% rooting response when the excised shoots were pulse treated with IBA solutions for ex vitro rooting experiments. This is the first report on the ex vitro rooting of shoots of P. edulis. Maximum response and number and length of roots were reported with IBA at 200 mgL−1 concentration and almost the same number of roots per shoot was observed when the shoots were treated with 300 mgL−1 IBA. Less number of roots (maximum 6.3 roots per shoot) was recorded with NAA concentrations (Table 5). Maximum number of roots () was reported with 200 mgL−1 IBA in this study (Figure 2(b)). It is a cost effective technique and could save time and energy in plant propagation system [3638]. Ex vitro root induction was successfully proved by many researchers in Ceropegia bulbosa [21], Leptadenia reticulata [23], Caralluma edulis [33], and so forth. It has been reported that ex vitro rooted plantlets are better suited to tolerate environmental stresses [39, 40].

Table 5: Effect of auxins (IBA, NAA) on ex vitro roots induction in the greenhouse after 5 weeks.
3.5. Hardening and Acclimatization of Plantlets

The in vitro as well as ex vitro rooted plantlets were hardened in the greenhouse. After 30–35 days, rooting was recorded in ex vitro rooted shoots. Transparent polythene cup caps were gradually loosened and finally removed after 30 days (Figure 3(a)). Plants were then transferred to nursery polybags for another 4-5 weeks (Figure 3(b)). About 88% of the plants were hardened successfully. Hardened and acclimatized plants were shifted to the soil beds (Figure 3(c)). The acclimatized plants exhibited normal growth and true-to-type morphology under natural conditions.

Figure 3: (a) Hardening of plantlets in the greenhouse. (b) Plantlets in nursery polybags. (c) Acclimatized plant of passion fruit growing in the natural conditions.
3.6. Conclusion

The rate of shoot multiplication was very high in the present report. The good success rate has been achieved in ex vitro rooting which saved time, energy, and cost of production of micropropagated plantlets. The developed method offers an alternative for mass propagation of disease-free stock plant material of Passiflora edulis. This could greatly enhance availability of superior and healthy passion fruit planting materials at an affordable cost to the farmers.

Abbreviations

BAP:6-Benzylaminopurine
Kin:Kinetin
IBA:Indole-3-butyric acid
NAA:α-Naphthalene acetic acid
MS medium:Murashige and Skoog (1962) medium
SFP:Spectral Flux Photon.

Disclosure

The present research work has not involved any human participants and/or animals.

Conflict of Interests

The authors report that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to the Department of Science, Technology and Environment, Government of Puducherry, for providing financial support as Grant-In-Aid Scheme.

References

  1. M. C. Veras, A. C. Pinto, and J. B. Meneses, “Influência da época de produção e dos estádios de maturação nos maracujás doce e ácido nas condições de cerrado,” Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 959–966, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. R. D. Petry, F. Reginatto, F. de-Paris et al., “Comparative pharmacological study of hydroethanol extracts of Passiflora alata and Passiflora edulis leaves,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 162–164, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. Sridhar, HRS Cultivating Passion Fruit, The Hindu, Andhra Pradesh, India, 2011.
  4. E. A. Carlini, “Plants and the central nervous system,” Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 501–512, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Morton, “Passionfruit,” in Fruits of Warm Climates, J. F. Morton and F. L. Miami, Eds., pp. 320–328, Florida Flair Books, Miami, Fla, USA, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  6. D. E. Moerman, Native American Ethanobotany, Timber Press, Portland, Ore, USA, 1998.
  7. D. E. Okwu, “Phytochemicals and vitamin content of indigenous spices of southeastern Nigeria,” Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment, vol. 6, pp. 30–37, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  8. P. P. Joy and C. G. Sherin, “Diseases of Passion fruit (Passiflora edulis) pathogen, symptoms, infection, spread and management,” 2012, http://www.kau.in/sites/default/files/documents/diseases_of_passion_fruit.pdf.
  9. I. H. Fischer and J. A. M. Rezende, “Diseases of Passion flower (Passiflora spp.),” Pest Technology, vol. 2, pp. 1–19, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  10. M. Ozarowski and B. Thiem, “Progress in micropropagation of Passiflora spp. to produce medicinal plants: a mini-review,” Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 937–947, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. K. Kartha and O. L. Gamborg, “Elimination of cassava mosaic disease by meristem culture,” Phytopathology, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 826–828, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. R. A. Drew, “In vitro culture of adult and juvenile bud explants of Passiflora species,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 23–27, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. A. da Gloria, M. L. C. Vieira, and M. C. Dornelas, “Anatomical studies of in vitro organogenesis induced in leaf-derived explants of passionfruit,” Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 2007–2013, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. C. B. D. A. Monteiro, E. N. Higashi, A. N. Gonçalves, and A. P. M. Rodriguez, “A novel approach for the definition of the inorganic medium components for micropropagation of yellow passionfruit (Passiflora edulis sims. F. Flavicarpa Deg.),” In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology—Plant, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 527–531, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. F. Trevisan and B. M. J. Mendes, “Optimization of in vitro organogenesis in passion fruit (Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpa),” Scientia Agricola, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 346–350, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. C. Ragavendran, G. Kamalanathan, G. Reena, and D. Natarajan, “In vitro propagation of nodal and shoot tip explants of Passiflora foetida L. An exotic medicinal plant,” Pelagia Research Library, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 707–711, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  17. T. Murashige and F. Skoog, “A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 473–497, 1962. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. L. Rolando, P. Ana, E. Nelson, and H. John, “Tissue culture of Ipomoea batatas: micropropagation and maintenance,” CIP Research Guide, CIP, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  19. M. C. Dornelas and M. L. C. Vieira, “Tissue culture studies on species of Passiflora,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 211–217, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. M. Hall, R. A. Drew, C. M. Higgins, and R. G. Dietzgen, “Efficient organogenesis of an Australian passionfruit hybrid (Passiflora edulis x Passiflora edulis var. flavicarpa) suitable for gene delivery,” Australian Journal of Botany, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 673–680, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Phulwaria, N. S. Shekhawat, J. S. Rathore, and R. P. Singh, “An efficient in vitro regeneration and ex vitro rooting of Ceropegia bulbosa Roxb.-A threatened and pharmaceutical important plant of Indian Thar Desert,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 25–29, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. S. Shekhawat, N. S. Shekhawat, Harish, K. Ram, M. Phulwaria, and A. K. Gupta, “High frequency plantlet regeneration from nodal segment culture of female Momordica dioica (Roxb.),” Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 133–137, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. M. S. Rathore, M. S. Rathore, and N. S. Shekhawat, “Ex vivo implications of phytohormones on various in vitro responses in Leptadenia reticulata (Retz.) Wight. & Arn.—an endangered plant,” Environmental and Experimental Botany, vol. 86, pp. 86–93, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. S. Shekhawat, N. Kannan, M. Manokari, and M. P. Ramanujam, “An efficient micropropagation protocol for high-frequency plantlet regeneration from liquid culture of nodal tissues in a medicinal plant, Turnera ulmifolia L,” Journal of Sustainable Forestry, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 327–336, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. N. S. Deora and N. S. Shekhawat, “Micropropagation of Capparis decidua (Forsk.) Edgew.—a tree of arid horticulture,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 15, no. 3-4, pp. 278–281, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. S. Shekhawat and N. S. Shekhawat, “Micropropagation of Arnebia hispidissima (Lehm). DC. and production of alkannin from callus and cell suspension culture,” Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1445–1450, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. K. A. Malik and P. K. Saxena, “Thidiazuron induces high-frequency shoot regeneration in intact seedlings of pea (Pisumsativum), chickpea (Cicerarietinum) and lentil (Lens culinaris),” Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 731–740, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. C.-L. Zhang, D.-F. Chen, M. C. Elliott, and A. Slater, “Thidiazuron-induced organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.),” In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Plant, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 305–310, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. Fratini and M. L. Ruiz, “Comparative study of different cytokinins in the induction of morphogenesis in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.),” In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology—Plant, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 46–51, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Chandra, R. Bandopadhyay, V. Kumar, and R. Chandra, “Acclimatization of tissue cultured plantlets: from laboratory to land,” Biotechnology Letters, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1199–1205, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. R. K. Suthar and S. D. Purohit, “Biopriming of micropropagated Boswellia serrata Roxb. plantlets—role of endophytic root fungus Piriformospora indica,” Indian Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 304–308, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. W. Schiefelbein and P. N. Benfey, “The development of plant roots: new approaches to underground problems,” Plant Cell, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 1147–1154, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. K. Patel, M. Phulwaria, M. K. Rai, A. K. Gupta, S. Shekhawat, and N. S. Shekhawat, “In vitro propagation and ex vitro rooting of Caralluma edulis (Edgew.) Benth. & Hook. f.: an endemic and endangered edible plant species of the Thar Desert,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 165, pp. 175–180, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. K. Rai, P. Asthana, V. S. Jaiswal, and U. Jaiswal, “Biotechnological advances in guava (Psidium guajava L.): recent developments and prospects for further research,” Trees—Structure and Function, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. Lodha, N. Rathore, V. Kataria, and N. S. Shekhawat, “In vitro propagation of female Ephedra foliata Boiss. & Kotschy ex Boiss.: an endemic and threatened Gymnosperm of the Thar Desert,” Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 375–383, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. H. Yan, C. Liang, L. Yang, and Y. Li, “In vitro and ex vitro rooting of Siratia grosvenorii, a traditional medicinal plant,” Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 115–120, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. K. K. Ranaweera, M. T. K. Gunasekara, and J. P. Eeswara, “Ex vitro rooting: a low cost micropropagation technique for Tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntz) hybrids,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 155, pp. 8–14, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. M. Shekhawat, N. Kannan, and M. Manokari, “In vitro propagation of traditional medicinal and dye yielding plant Morinda coreia Buch.–Ham,” South African Journal of Botany, vol. 100, pp. 43–50, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. P. Baskaran and J. Van Staden, “Rapid in vitro micropropagation of Agapanthus praecox,” South African Journal of Botany, vol. 86, pp. 46–50, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. S. Shekhawat, N. Kannan, M. Manokari, and C. Ravindran, “Enhanced micropropagation protocol of Morinda citrifolia L. through nodal explants,” Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar