Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Scientifica
Volume 2015, Article ID 896507, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/896507
Research Article

Evaluation of Gingival Microleakage in Class II Composite Restorations with Different Lining Techniques: An In Vitro Study

1Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dayananda Sagar College of Dental Sciences, Bangalore 560 078, India
2Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, M.S. Ramaiah Dental College, Karnataka 560054, India

Received 3 June 2015; Revised 23 July 2015; Accepted 19 August 2015

Academic Editor: Conrado Aparicio

Copyright © 2015 Vedavathi Bore Gowda et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. A. Berry and A. H. L. Tjan, “Microleakage of amalgam restorations lined with dentin adhesives,” American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 7, pp. 333–335, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  2. J. Castelnuovo, A. H. L. Tjan, and P. Liu, “Microleakage of multistep and simplified step bonding systems,” American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 245–248, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. R. K. Raju, B. T. Vishwanath, and V. Shivanna, “Comparative microleakage evaluation of a flowable composite versus an injectable Glass Ionomer cement in Class II slot preparations—an in vitro study,” Journal of Conservative Dentistry, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 65–70, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  4. B. Simi and B. S. Suprabha, “Evaluation of microleakage in posterior nanocomposite restorations with adhesive liners,” Journal of Conservative Dentistry, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 178–181, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S.-F. Chuang, Y.-T. Jin, T.-S. Lin, C.-H. Chang, and F. García-Godoy, “Effects of lining materials on microleakage and internal voids of class II resin-based composite restorations,” American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 84–90, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. Patil Amita, M. Rushikesh, M. Ashish, J. Deepak, M. Sudha, and S. Adish, “Microleakage of class II packable composite lined with conventional GIC, flowable composite and Resin modified GIC; an in-vitro study,” Unique Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 112–116, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  7. R. M. Carvalho, D. H. Pashley, and J. C. Pereira, “A review of polymerization contraction; The influence of stress development v/s stress relief,” Journal of Operative Dentistry, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  8. C. Poggio, M. Chiesa, A. Scribante, J. Mekler, and M. Colombo, “Microleakage in class II composite restorations with margins below the CEJ: in vitro evaluation of different restorative techniques,” Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. e793–e798, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. H. Payne IV, “The marginal seal of class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer,” The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 123–130, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Beznos, “Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite class II cavities with different restorative techniques,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 60–69, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S.-F. Chuang, Y.-T. Jin, P.-F. Tsai, and T.-Y. Wong, “Effect of various surface protections on the marginal microleakage of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer cements,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 309–314, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. O.-H. Kwon, D.-H. Kim, and S.-H. Park, “The influence of elastic modulus of base material on the marginal adaptation of direct composite restoration,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 441–447, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Estafan, A. Estafan, and K. F. Leinfelder, “Cavity wall adaptation of resin-based composites lined with flowable composites,” American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 192–194, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. I. E. Andersson-Wenckert, J. W. V. van Dijken, and P. Hörstedt, “Modified Class II open sandwich restorations: evaluation of interfacial adaptation and influence of different restorative techniques,” European Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 270–275, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. L. Unterbrink and W. H. Liebenberg, “Flowable resin composite filled adhesives; literature review and clinical recommendations,” Quintessence International, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 40–45, 2001. View at Google Scholar