Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Scientifica
Volume 2016, Article ID 8176267, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8176267
Research Article

Pre- and Postcopulatory Traits of Salvator Male Lizards in Allopatry and Sympatry

Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal (IDEA), CONICET and Laboratorio de Biología del Comportamiento, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Vélez Sársfield 299, X5000JJC Córdoba, Argentina

Received 16 December 2015; Revised 23 February 2016; Accepted 3 March 2016

Academic Editor: Pablo M. Vergara

Copyright © 2016 Sergio Naretto et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Andersson, Sexual Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1994.
  2. J. S. Keogh, K. D. L. Umbers, E. Wilson, J. Stapley, and M. J. Whiting, “Influence of alternate reproductive tactics and pre- and postcopulatory sexual selection on paternity and offspring performance in a lizard,” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 629–638, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Berglund, A. Bisazza, and A. Pilastro, “Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility,” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 385–399, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Stapley and J. S. Keogh, “Behavioral syndromes influence mating systems: floater pairs of a lizard have heavier offspring,” Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 514–520, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. A. Baird, S. F. Fox, and J. K. McCoy, “Population differences in the roles of size and coloration in intra- and intersexual selection in the collared lizard, Crotaphytus collaris: influence of habitat and social organization,” Behavioral Ecology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 506–517, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. A. Carretero, R. Ribeiro, D. Barbosa, P. Sá-Sousa, and D. J. Harris, “Spermatogenesis in two iberian podarcis lizards: relationships with male traits,” Animal Biology, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Kaliontzopoulou, M. A. Carretero, and G. A. Llorente, “Multivariate and geometric morphometrics in the analysis of sexual dimorphism variation in Podarcis lizards,” Journal of Morphology, vol. 268, no. 2, pp. 152–165, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Langkilde and R. Shine, “Interspecific conflict in lizards: social dominance depends upon an individual's species not its body size,” Austral Ecology, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 869–877, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. F. Grether, N. Losin, C. N. Anderson, and K. Okamoto, “The role of interspecific interference competition in character displacement and the evolution of competitor recognition,” Biological Reviews, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 617–635, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Kvarnemo and L. W. Simmons, “Polyandry as a mediator of sexual selection before and after mating,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, vol. 368, Article ID 20120042, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Wacker, K. Mobley, E. Forsgren, L. C. Myhre, K. de Jong, and T. Amundsen, “Operational sex ratio but not density affects sexual selection in a fish,” Evolution, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 1937–1949, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. P. Dial, E. Greene, and D. J. Irschick, “Allometry of behavior,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 394–401, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. A. Fitzgerald, F. B. Cruz, and G. Perotti, “The reproductive cycle and the size of maturity of Tupinambis rufescens (Sauria: Teiidae) in the Dry Chaco of Argentina,” Journal of Herpetology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 70–78, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. M. Gienger and D. D. Beck, “Heads or tails? Sexual dimorphism in helodermatid lizards,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 92–98, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. L. J. Vitt and J. P. Cadwell, Herpetology: An Introductory Biology of Amphibians and Reptilians, Academic Press, London, UK, 3rd edition, 2009.
  16. A. Herrel, R. Van Damme, and F. De Vree, “Sexual dimorphism of head size in Podarcis hispanica atrata: testing the dietary divergence hypothesis by bite force analysis,” Netherlands Journal of Zoology, vol. 46, no. 3-4, pp. 253–262, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Herrel, L. Spithoven, R. Van Damme, and F. De Vree, “Sexual dimorphism of head size in Gallotia galloti: testing the niche divergence hypothesis by functional analyses,” Functional Ecology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 289–297, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Herrel, L. D. McBrayer, and P. M. Larson, “Functional basis for sexual differences in bite force in the lizard Anolis carolinensis,” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 111–119, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. A. Anderson and L. J. Vitt, “Sexual selection versus alternative causes of sexual dimorphism in teiid lizards,” Oecologia, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 145–157, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. P. Lailvaux and D. J. Irschick, “A functional perspective on sexual selection: insights and future prospects,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 263–273, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Naretto, G. Cardozo, C. S. Blengini, and M. Chiaraviglio, “Sexual selection and dynamics of jaw muscle in Tupinambis lizards,” Evolutionary Biology, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 192–200, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Higgie and M. W. Blows, “The evolution of reproductive character displacement conflicts with how sexual selection operates within a species,” Evolution, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 1192–1203, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Cordero Rivera, J. A. Andrés, A. Córdoba-Aguilar, and C. Utzeri, “Postmating sexual selection: allopatric evolution of sperm competition mechanisms and genital morphology in calopterygid damselflies (Insecta: Odonata),” Evolution, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 349–359, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. Arnold, “The hemipenis of lacertid lizards (Reptilia: Lacertidae): structure, variation and systematic implications,” Journal of Natural History, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1221–1257, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. M. Gomendio, J. Martin-Coello, C. Crespo, C. Magaña, and E. R. S. Roldan, “Sperm competition enhances functional capacity of mammalian spermatozoa,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 41, pp. 15113–15117, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. Pizzari and G. A. Parker, “Sperm competition and sperm phenotype,” in Sperm Biology: An Evolutionary Perspective, T. R. Birkhead, D. J. Hosken, and S. Pitnick, Eds., pp. 207–246, Academic Press, London, UK, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  27. J. delBarco-Trillo, M. Tourmente, and E. R. S. Roldan, “Metabolic rate limits the effect of sperm competition on mammalian spermatogenesis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 9, Article ID e76510, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. Pitnick, D. J. Hosken, and T. R. Birkhead, “Sperm morphological diversity,” in Sperm Biology: An Evolutionary Perspective, T. R. Birkhead, D. J. Hosken, and S. Pitnick, Eds., pp. 69–149, Academic Press, London, UK, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  29. C. S. Blengini, M. E. Teves, D. R. Ũates, H. A. Guidobaldi, L. V. Gatica, and L. C. Giojalas, “Human sperm pattern of movement during chemotactic re-orientation towards a progesterone source,” Asian Journal of Andrology, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 769–773, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. R. Birkhead, J. G. Martínez, T. Burke, and D. P. Froman, “Sperm mobility determines the outcome of sperm competition in the domestic fowl,” Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series of London Series B, vol. 266, no. 1430, pp. 1759–1764, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. Gomendio and E. R. S. Roldan, “Implications of diversity in sperm size and function for sperm competition and fertility,” International Journal of Developmental Biology, vol. 52, no. 5-6, pp. 439–447, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J.-M. J. Beausoleil, S. M. Doucet, D. D. Heath, and T. E. Pitcher, “Spawning coloration, female choice and sperm competition in the redside dace, Clinostomus elongatus,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 969–977, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. B. Harvey, G. N. Ugueto, and R. L. Gutberlet Jr., “Review of teiid morphology with a revised taxonomy and phylogeny of the teiidae (lepidosauria: Squamata),” Zootaxa, no. 3459, pp. 1–156, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. I. Cabaña, C. N. Gardenal, M. Chiaraviglio, and P. C. Rivera, “Natural hybridization in lizards of the Genus Tupinambis (Teiidae) in the southernmost contact zone of their distribution range,” Annales Zoologici Fennici, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 340–348, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. G. Cardozo, S. Naretto, M. Zak, and M. Chiaraviglio, “The role of landscape in contact zones of sister species of lizards,” in Perspective on Nature Conservation—Patterns, Pressures and Prospects, J. Tiefenbacher, Ed., pp. 161–176, InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  36. S. Lanfri, V. Di Cola, S. Naretto, M. Chiaraviglio, and G. Cardozo, “Understanding the ecological niche to elucidate spatial strategies of the southernmost Tupinambis lizards,” Amphibia-Reptilia, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 551–565, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. I. Ahnesjö, C. Kvarnemo, and S. Merilaita, “Using potential reproductive rates to predict mating competition among individuals qualified to mate,” Behavioral Ecology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 397–401, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. K. de Jong, S. Wacker, T. Amundsen, and E. Forsgren, “Do operational sex ratio and density affect mating behaviour? An experiment on the two-spotted goby,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 1229–1238, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. Corl, A. R. Davis, S. R. Kuchta, T. Comendant, and B. Sinervo, “Alternative mating strategies and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in the side-blotched lizard, UTA stansburiana: a population-level comparative analysis,” Evolution, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 79–96, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C. S. Blengini, N. Sergio, C. Gabriela, L. C. Giojalas, and C. Margarita, “Variability in sperm form and function in the context of sperm competition risk in two Tupinambis lizards,” Ecology and Evolution, vol. 4, no. 21, pp. 4080–4092, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. M. Cei, Reptiles del Noroeste, Nordeste y Este de la Argentina. Herpetofauna de las selvas Subtropicales, Puna y Pampas, Monografie XIV, Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, Torino, Italy, 1993.
  42. S. Naretto, G. Cardozo, C. S. Blengini, and M. Chiaraviglio, “Importance of reproductive biology of a harvest lizard, Tupinambis merianae, for the management of commercial harvesting,” Wildlife Research, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 697–704, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. A. Rubi Bianchi and S. A. C. Cravero, Atlas Climático Digital de la República Argentina, Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2010.
  44. AVMA, (American Veterinary Medical Association), Guidelines on euthanasia (Formely report of the AVMA panel on euthanasia), 2013, http://www.avma.org/issues/animal_welfare/euthanasia.pdf.
  45. G. Cardozo, S. Naretto, C. S. Blengini, and M. Chiaraviglio, “Phenotypic diversity in female body shape is related to reproductive potential in Tupinambis merianae Lizards,” Annales Zoologici Fennici, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 129–144, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. Tourmente, M. Gomendio, E. R. S. Roldan, L. C. Giojalas, and M. Chiaraviglio, “Sperm competition and reproductive mode influence sperm dimensions and structure among snakes,” Evolution, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 2513–2524, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. T. Madsen and R. Shine, “The adjustment of reproductive threshold to prey abundance in a capital breeder,” Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 571–580, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. E. I. Svensson, “Beyond hybridization: diversity of interactions with heterospecifics, direct fitness consequences and the effects on mate preferences,” Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 270–273, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. B. T. Preston, I. R. Stevenson, J. M. Pemberton, D. W. Coltman, and K. Wilson, “Overt and covert competition in a promiscuous mammal: the importance of weaponry and testes size to male reproductive success,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 270, no. 1515, pp. 633–640, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. B. T. Preston, I. R. Stevenson, J. M. Pemberton, and K. Wilson, “Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion,” Nature, vol. 409, no. 6821, pp. 681–682, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. H. R. Lopes and A. S. Abe, “Biologia reprodutiva e comportamento do teiú, Tupinambis merianae, em cativero (Reptilia, Teiidae),” in Manejo y Conservación de Fauna Silvestre en América Latina, T. G. Fang, O. L. Montenegro, and R. E. Bodmer, Eds., pp. 259–272, Editorial Instituto e Ecología La Paz, La Paz, Bolivia, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  52. M. V. García Valdez, S. Chamut, G. V. Jaen, O. E. A. Arce, and M. E. Manes, “Dynamics of ovarian follicles in Tupinambis merianae lizards,” Acta Herpetologica, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 303–313, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. P. R. Ortiz and T. A. Jenssen, “Interspecific aggression between lizard competitors, Anolis cooki and Anolis cristatellus,” Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 227–238, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. M. R. Servedio and M. A. F. Noor, “The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data,” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, vol. 34, pp. 339–364, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. B. P. Stephenson and A. Ramírez-Bautista, “Did sexually dimorphic dorsal coloration evolve by a pre-existing bias in males in the lizard Sceloporus minor?” Evolutionary Ecology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1277–1291, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus