Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Scientifica
Volume 2016, Article ID 8379865, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8379865
Research Article

A Stereomicroscopic Evaluation of Dentinal Cracks at Different Instrumentation Lengths by Using Different Rotary Files (ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex CM): An Ex Vivo Study

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Rama Dental College, Hospital and Research Centre, Lakhanpur, Kanpur 208024, India

Received 30 December 2015; Accepted 13 April 2016

Academic Editor: Luigi Califano

Copyright © 2016 Fauzia Ashraf et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Burklein, K. Hinschitza, T. Dammaschke, and E. Schäfer, “Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single—file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 449–461, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. N. T. Priya, V. Chandrasekhar, S. Anita et al., “‘Dentinal microcracks after root canal preparation’ a comparative evaluation with hand, rotary and reciprocating instrumentation,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 8, no. 12, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. P. P. S. Lam, J. E. A. Palamara, and H. H. Messer, “Fracture strength of tooth roots following canal preparation by hand and rotary instrumentation,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 529–532, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. S. J. Pereira, I. F. C. Peixoto, A. C. D. Viana et al., “Physical and mechanical properties of a thermomechanically treated NiTi wire used in the manufacture of rotary endodontic instruments,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 469–474, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. D. Ricucci and K. Langeland, “Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 2. A histological study,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 394–409, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. L. R. Wilcox, C. Roskelley, and T. Sutton, “The relationship of root canal enlargement to finger-spreader induced vertical root fracture,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 533–534, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. J. Ruddle, “The ProTaper endodontic system: geometries, features, and guidelines for use,” Dentistry today, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 60–67, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Gianluca, “The K3 rotary nickel titanium instrument system,” Endodontic Topics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 179–182, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. O. Yoldas, S. Yilmaz, G. Atakan, C. Kuden, and Z. Kasan, “Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 232–235, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. R. Lui, A. Kaiwar, H. Shemesh, P. R. Wesselink, B. Hou, and M. K. Wu, “Incidence of apical root cracks and apical dentinal detachments after canal preparation with hand and rotary files at different instrumentation lengths,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 129–132, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. I. D. Capar, H. Arslan, M. Akcay, and B. Uysal, “Effects of ProTaper universal, ProTaper next, and HyFlex instruments on crack formation in dentin,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1482–1484, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. C. J. Ruddle, P. Machtou, and J. D. West, “The shaping movement: fifth-generation technology,” Dentistry Today, vol. 32, no. 4, article 94, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  13. H. Arslan, E. Karatas, D. C. Ismail, D. Ozsu, and E. Doganay, “Effect of protaper universal, endoflare, revo-S, hyflex coronal flaring instruments, and gates glidden drills on crack formation,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1681–1683, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. M. Alfoqom Alazemi, S. T. Bryant, and P. M. H. Dummer, “Deformation of HyFlex CM instruments and their shape recovery following heat sterilization,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 593–601, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. A. Thompson, “An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 297–310, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. O. A. Peters, R. D. Morgental, K. A. Schulze, F. Paqué, P. M. P. Kopper, and F. V. Vier-Pelisser, “Determining cutting efficiency of nickel-titanium coronal flaring instruments used in lateral action,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 505–513, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus