Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Scientifica
Volume 2016, Article ID 9463186, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9463186
Review Article

Prosthetics and Techniques in Repair of Animal’s Abdominal Wall

1Experimental Surgery Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80216, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
2Department of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Dakahlia 35516, Egypt
3Biological Science Department, Faculty of Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
4Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Science, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
5Biochemistry Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Received 3 December 2015; Accepted 21 April 2016

Academic Editor: Sotirios Korossis

Copyright © 2016 Gamal Karrouf et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Ladurner, A. Trupka, S. Schmidbauer, and K. Hallfedt, “The uses of an underlay polypropylene mesh in complicated incisional hernias: successful French surgical technique,” Minerva Chirurgica, vol. 56, article 111, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  2. M. Iqbal, I. Isma, M. A. Khan, and I. G. Azim Fand Ahmed, “Reconstruction of abdominal wall defect with a jejunal graft in dogs,” International Journal of Animal Sciences, vol. 9, p. 147, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  3. D. Krishnamurthy, “Hernia,” in Ruminant Surgery, R. P. S. Tyagi and J. Singh, Eds., pp. 225–237, GBS Publishers and Distribution, New Delhi, India, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. A. Khan, T. Hamid, A. K. Mahmood, U. Farooq, S. S. Ahmad, and M. K. Shahzad, “Comparative efficacy of polypropylene mesh and jejunal graft for the repair of abdominal wall defect in dogs,” Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, vol. 18, no. 2-3, pp. 67–71, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J.-Y. Lai, P.-Y. Chang, and J.-N. Lin, “Body wall repair using small intestinal submucosa seeded with cells,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 1752–1755, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. K. Gangwar, A. K. Sharma, N. Kumar et al., “Acellular dermal graft for repair of abdominal wall defects in rabbits,” Journal of the South African Veterinary Association, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 79–85, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. P. Amid, “Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery,” Hernia, vol. 1, article 15, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  8. C. F. Bellows, D. Albo, D. H. Berger, and S. S. Awad, “Abdominal wall repair using human acellular dermis,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 194, no. 2, pp. 192–198, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Kartinof, “Surgical biomaterials and tissue regeneration technologies,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 3, p. 123, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  10. A. Marques, A. Lopes, L. M. Yojo et al., “A retrospective study of the use of bovine pericardium, dura mater, and polypropylene mesh as reinforcement materials in abdominal and thoracic wall reconstruction,” Current Therapeutic Research, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 492–497, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. L. Baptista, M. E. Bonsack, and J. P. Delaney, “Seprafilm reduces adhesions to polypropylene mesh,” Surgery, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 86–92, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. W. Novitsky, A. G. Harrell, J. A. Cristiano et al., “Comparative evaluation of adhesion formation, strength of in growth, and textile properties of prosthetic meshes after long-term intra-abdominal implantation in a rabbit,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 6–11, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. I. Gilbert, E. M. Peers, and C. B. Brown, “Intraperitoneal fluid dynamics of 4% Icodextrin in non-ERSD patients,” Peritoneal Dialysis International, vol. 19, article S79, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  14. D. Mutter, F. R. Jamalia, D. L. Moody, G. T. Rodeheaver, M. Thérin, and J. Marescaux, “The concept of protected mesh to minimize adhesion formation in intraperitoneat abdominal wall reinforcement. Preclinical evaluation of a new composite mesh,” Hernia, vol. 4, supplement 1, pp. S3–S9, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. M. van'T Riet, P. J. de Vos van Steenwijk, F. Bonthuis et al., “Prevention of adhesion to prosthetic mesh: comparison of different barriers using an incisional hernia model,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 237, no. 1, pp. 123–128, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. Peláez Mata, J. A. Alvarez Zapico, C. Gutiérrez Segura et al., “Fascia lata transplant from cadaveric donor in the reconstruction of abdominal wall defects in children,” Cirugía Pediátrica, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 28–30, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  17. A. Q. Pillay, W. S. Tung, J. Zainol, and A. G. Pillay, “Processed bovine tunica vaginalis as a biomaterial for the repair of large abdominal wall defects in surgical treatment,” Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 7–11, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. Y. M. Hafeez, A. B. Z. Zuki, M. Y. Loqman, N. Yusof, H. Asnah, and M. M. Noordin, “Glycerol preserved bovine pericardium for abdominal wall reconstruction: experimental study in rat model,” The Medical Journal of Malaysia, vol. 59, pp. 117–118, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. Ueno, L. C. Pickett, S. G. de la Fuente, D. C. Lawson, and T. N. Pappas, “Clinical application of porcine small intestinal submucosa in the management of infected or potentially contaminated abdominal defects,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 109–112, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Singh, N. Kumar, A. K. Sharma, S. K. Maiti, T. K. Goswami, and A. K. Sharma, “Acellular biomaterials of porcine origin for the reconstruction of abdominal wall defects in rabbits,” Trends in Biomaterials and Artificial Organs, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 34–44, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  21. K. C. Harth and M. J. Rosen, “Major complications associated with xenograft biologic mesh implantation in abdominal wall reconstruction,” Surgical Innovation, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 324–329, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. G. Pascual, M. Rodríguez, S. Sotomayor, E. Moraleda, and J. M. Bellón, “Effects of collagen prosthesis cross-linking on long-term tissue regeneration following the repair of an abdominal wall defect,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 402–413, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. C. F. Bellows, A. Smith, J. Malsbury, and W. S. Helton, “Repair of incisional hernias with biological prosthesis: a systematic review of current evidence,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 205, no. 1, pp. 85–101, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H.-C. Liang, Y. Chang, C.-K. Hsu, M.-H. Lee, and H.-W. Sung, “Effects of crosslinking degree of an acellular biological tissue on its tissue regeneration pattern,” Biomaterials, vol. 25, no. 17, pp. 3541–3552, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Kapan, M. Kapan, E. Goksoy, I. Karabicak, and H. Oktar, “Comparison of PTFE, pericardium bovine and fascia lata for repair of incisional hernia in rat model, experimental study,” Hernia, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 39–43, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. N. Limpert, A. R. Desai, A. L. Kumpf, M. A. Fallucco, and D. L. Aridge, “Repair of abdominal wall defects with bovine pericardium,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 198, no. 5, pp. e60–e65, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Cavallaro, E. L. Menzo, M. Di Vita et al., “Use of biological meshes for abdominal wall reconstruction in highly contaminated fields,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 16, no. 15, pp. 1928–1933, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. F. J. Schoen and R. J. Levy, “Tissue heart valves: current challenges and future research perspectives,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 439–465, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. E. Schmidt and J. M. Baier, “Acellular vascular tissues: natural biomaterials for tissue repair and tissue engineering,” Biomaterials, vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 2215–2231, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. R. D. Frandson, W. L. Wilke, and A. D. Fails, Anatomy and Physiology of Farm Animals, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2003.
  31. V. Schumpelick, U. Klinge, K. Junge, and M. Stumpf, “Incisional abdominal hernia: the open mesh repair,” Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, vol. 389, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. N. H. Kader, B. T. Abass, and H. I. Al-Sadi, “A comparative experimental study of the use of tunica vaginalis and pericardium as allografts for hernioplasty in sheep,” Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 57–70, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  33. K. Abouelnasr, Evaluation of some prosthetic materials and techniques used for repair of abdominal hernia and defect (experimental and clinical study) [M.S. thesis], Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt, 2008.
  34. M. G. Franz, P. D. Smith, T. L. Wachtel et al., “Fascial incisions heal faster than skin: a new model of abdominal wall repair,” Surgery, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 203–208, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. N. L. James, L. A. Poole-Warren, K. Schindhelm et al., “Comparative evaluation of treated bovine pericardium as a xenograft for hernia repair,” Biomaterials, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 801–809, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J. B. Park and J. D. Bronzino, Biomaterials: Principle and Applications, CRC Press LLC, New York, NY, USA, 2003.
  37. A. Jayakrishnan and S. R. Jameela, “Glutaraldehyde as a fixative in bioprostheses and drug delivery matrices,” Biomaterials, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 471–484, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. G. Quitzan, C. R. Sheila, S. R. Noeme, and J. C. Adalberto, “Comparison of glycerin preserved bovine pericardium and a polyester mesh for the repair of abdominal wall defects in rats,” Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 297–301, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. Y. M. Hafeez, A. B. Z. Zuki, M. Y. Loqman, M. M. Noordin, and Y. Norimah, “Comparative evaluations of the processed bovine tunica vaginalis implant in a rat model,” Anatomical Science International, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 181–188, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. D. R. Boughner, M. Haldenby, A. J. Hui, J. Dunmore-Buyze, E. A. Talman, and W. K. Wan, “The pericardial bioprosthesis: altered tissue shear properties following glutaraldelhyde fixation,” Journal of Heart Valve Disease, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 752–760, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. J. Coito and J. W. Kupiec-Weglinski, “Extracellular matrix proteins: bystanders or active participants in the allograft rejection cascade?” Annals of Transplantation, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 14–18, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. O. Cornu, X. Banse, P. L. Docquier, S. Luyckx, and C. Delloye, “Effect of freeze-drying and gamma irradiation on the mechanical properties of human cancellous bone,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 426–431, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. T. Ayele, A. B. Z. Zuki, B. M. A. Noorjahan, and M. M. Noordin, “A comparative study of lyophilized bovine pericardium and tunica parietalis vaginalis for repair of large abdominal wall defects in a rabbit model,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 44, pp. 8942–8949, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. B. D. Matthews, G. Mostafa, A. M. Carbonell et al., “Evaluation of adhesion formation and host tissue response to intra-abdominal polytetrafluoroethylene mesh and composite prosthetic mesh,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 227–234, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. T. S. de Vries Reilingh, D. van Geldere, B. Langenhorst et al., “Repair of large midline incisional hernias with polypropylene mesh: comparison of three operative techniques,” Hernia, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 56–59, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. B. G. Parulkar, S. K. Mathur, A. N. Supe, A. B. Samsi, and I. M. Vora, “Use of indigenous knitted nylon mesh to repair large abdominal defects—an experimental study,” Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 214–218, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. K. Abouelnasr, A. Zaghloul, and G. Karrouf, “Comparative evaluation of glycerolized bovine pericardium implant with prolene mesh for closure of large abdominal wall defects in dogs,” Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research, Shiraz University IJVR, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 211–217, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  48. J. Halm and J. Jeekel, “Incisional hernia—long-term complications of abdominal surgery,” Global Surgery-Future Direction, vol. 11, pp. 1–4, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  49. R. Ko, E. A. Kazacos, S. Snyder, D. M. J. Ernst, and G. C. Lantz, “Tensile strength comparison of small intestinal submucosa body wall repair,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. S. Badylak, K. Kokini, B. Tullius, A. Simmons-Byrd, and R. Morff, “Morphologic study of small intestinal submucosa as a body wall repair device,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 190–202, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. Y. M. Hafeez, A. B. Z. Zuki, N. Yusof et al., “Effect of freeze-drying and gamma irradiation on biomechanical properties of bovine pericardium,” Cell and Tissue Banking, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 85–89, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. C. Emanuel, M. D. Trabuco, E. Mark, M. S. Zobits, M. D. Klingele, and B. Johns, “Effect of host response (incorporation, encapsulation, mixed incorporation and encapsulation or resorption) on the tensile strength of graft reinforced repair in the rate ventral hernia model,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 197, no. 6, pp. 638.e1–638.e6, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. P. Santillan-Doherty, R. Jasso-Victoria, A. Sotres-Vega et al., “Thoracoabdominal wall repair with glutaraldehyde-preserved bovine pericardium,” Journal of Investigative Surgery, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 45–55, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. Y. Chang, C.-C. Tsai, H.-C. Liang, and H.-W. Sung, “In vivo evaluation of cellular and acellular bovine pericardia fixed with a naturally occurring crosslinking agent (genipin),” Biomaterials, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2447–2457, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. D. A. DuBay, X. Wang, B. Adamson, W. M. Kuzon Jr., R. G. Dennis, and M. G. Franz, “Mesh incisional herniorrhaphy increases abdominal wall elastic properties: a mechanism for decreased hernia recurrences in comparison with suture repair,” Surgery, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 14–24, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. M. P. Elliott and G. L. Juler, “Comparison of marlex mesh and microporous teflon sheets when used for hernia repair in the experimental animal,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 137, no. 3, pp. 342–344, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus