An Assessment of Local People’s Support to Private Wildlife Conservation: A Case of Save Valley Conservancy and Fringe Communities, Zimbabwe

Table 2

Strategies respondents employ to resist SVC conservation efforts across the villages.

Ward(s)	Village(s)	Poaching of terrestrial mammal species	Cutting and stealing of perimeter fence	Non-cooperation via illegal grazing	Feigned compliance	Collaborating with external poachers	Not able to actively oppose the SVC
3	Matsai	4	3	1	2	0	1
26	24	3	2	1	2	0	2
	26	4	0	2	1	2	1
	27	5	0	1	0	0	1
	31	3	3	1	2	1	1
	Total ()	19 (39%)	8 (16%)	6 (12%)	7 (14%)	3 (6%)	6 (12%)

Note: contained in this table are numbers of respondents (not bracketed) who provided a response.