A Potential Anticancer Mechanism of Finger Root (<i>Boesenbergia rotunda</i>) Extracts against a Breast Cancer Cell Line

Widyananda, Muhammad Hermawan; Wicaksono, Septian Tri; Rahmawati, Kurnia; Puspitarini, Sapti; Ulfa, Siti Mariyah; Jatmiko, Yoga Dwi; Masruri, Masruri; Widodo, Nashi

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9130252

Scientifica

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 9130252 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9130252

A Potential Anticancer Mechanism of Finger Root (Boesenbergia rotunda) Extracts against a Breast Cancer Cell Line

Muhammad Hermawan Widyananda,¹Septian Tri Wicaksono,¹Kurnia Rahmawati,²Sapti Puspitarini,¹Siti Mariyah Ulfa,³Yoga Dwi Jatmiko,¹Masruri Masruri,³and Nashi Widodo¹

Academic Editor: Kent L. Erickson

Received23 Feb 2022

Revised13 Jun 2022

Accepted16 Jul 2022

Published05 Sept 2022

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer women suffer from worldwide in 2020 and the 4th leading cause of cancer death. Boesenbergia rotunda is an herb with high potential as an anticancer agent. This study explores the potential bioactive compounds in B. rotunda as anti-breast cancer agents using in silico and in vitro approaches. The in silico study was used for active compound analysis, selection of anticancer compound candidates, prediction of target protein, functional annotation, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation, respectively. The in vitro study was conducted by measurement toxicity, rhodamine 123, and apoptosis assays on T47D cells. Based on the KNApSAcK database, B. rotunda contained 20 metabolites, which are dominated by chalcone and flavonoid groups. Seven of them were predicted to have anticancer activity, namely, sakuranetin, cardamonin, alpinetin, 2S-pinocembrin, 7.4′-dihydroxy-5-methoxyflavanone, 5.6-dehydrokawain, and pinostrobin chalcone. These compounds targeted proteins related to cancer progression pathways such as the PI3K/Akt, FOXO, JAK/STAT, and estrogen signaling pathways. Therefore, these compounds are predicted to inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of cancer cells through their interactions with MMP12, MMP13, CDK4, JAK3, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, and KCNA3. Anticancer activity of B. rotunda through in vitro study confirmed that B. rotunda extract is strong cytotoxic and induces apoptosis of breast cancer cell lines. This study concludes that Boesenbergia rotunda has potency as an anticancer candidate.

1. Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in women worldwide in 2020, followed by lung, prostate, and skin cancers. This type of cancer is the 4th leading cause of death from cancer after lung, stomach, and liver cancers [1]. Breast cancer patients are mostly in the reproductive age, namely, 30 to 39 years [2]. Previous studies have reported that the breast cancer deaths were increasing over the last 25 years. Thus, the effort is needed for the discovery of cancer drugs that are effective in treating breast cancer [3]. Breast cancer is mostly caused by obesity, alcohol consumption, genetics, and age [4]. The breast cancer cells caused by alteration of specific genes that result in dysregulation of several pathways related to cell proliferation and survival [5].

Several pathways were dysregulated in breast tumor cells, including the estrogen signaling pathway, PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, and JAK/STAT signaling pathway. The estrogen signaling pathway that plays a role in regulating cell division is dysregulated through overactivity of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα). ERα will be activated after binding to estrogen, form a dimer, and then attach to the estrogen response element (ERE) in DNA [6]. ERE consists of genes related to cell growth [7, 8]. The PI3K/Akt signaling pathway has a crucial role in the progression of breast cancer cells because it is involved in proliferation, survival, invasion, migration, apoptosis, glucose metabolism, and DNA repair in cells. The mutation of PI3K protein, especially in ER + subtype breast cancer, causes PI3K hyperactivation [9]. Several protein tyrosine kinase receptors of the PI3K/Akt pathway, such as HER2 and EGFR, are overexpressed and mutated in breast cancer cells [10, 11]. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway has an essential role in the development of breast cancer cells. Three major proteins play a role in this pathway including receptor tyrosine kinase, JAK (Janus kinase), and STAT (signal transducer and activator of transcription). Alteration of these proteins causes proliferation and metastasis in breast cancer cells [12]. Various therapies have been developed to inhibit the activity of these pathways from preventing breast cancer progression.

Today, the most common treatment for breast cancer is chemotherapy [13]. However, chemotherapy has adverse side effects for patients such as constipation, dyspnea, fatigue, pain, rash, vomiting, and pain, and the most dangerous side effect is peripheral neuropathy [14, 15]. Cisplatin is the main chemotherapy drug for treating solid tumors; however, it has side effects that caused kidney and liver damage [16]. Doxorubicin is a DNA intercalation agent that effectively inhibits tumor progression. Unfortunately, doxorubicin has a cardiotoxicity effect [17]. Gefitinib is quite popularly used for cancer treatment that targets the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). However, this drug has side effects such as rash, diarrhea, and even inflammation of the lower urinary tract and bladder [18]. Other chemotherapy drugs also have side effects that are no less dangerous. In addition, chemotherapy is not provided in all hospitals globally because it is expensive. Therefore, agents for cancer therapy are needed from natural sources that are cheap and have minimal side effects.

Boesenbergia rotunda is an herb with high potential as an anticancer agent. B. rotunda belongs to the Zingiberaceae family that grows in Southeast Asia, India, Sri Lanka, and southern China. In these countries, B. rotunda is known as a medicinal plant that can treat various diseases [19]. Previous research mentioned that B. rotunda hexane extract was toxic to liver, lung, and colon cancer cell lines [20]. Previous studies stated that the ethanol extract of B. rotunda has antiproliferative activity and induces apoptosis in HeLa cervical cancer cells [21]. The anticancer activity of B. rotunda is predicted because of the presence of their bioactive compounds. Sakuranetin has a cytotoxic effect on B16BL6 melanoma cells by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway [22]. Cardamonin and pinostrobin chaconne isolated from rhizome B. rotunda have a cytotoxic effect on the H-29 colon cancer cell line [23]. No previous studies have investigated the potential anticancer activity of all potential bioactive compounds found in B. rotunda. In silico followed by in vitro experiments are the most appropriate approach for the initial study of anticancer potential bioactive compounds present in B. rotunda.

The in silico approach is very appropriately used for drug candidate screening because it can accelerate the finding of drug candidate compounds by predicting their cellular and molecular mechanisms [24]. The results will be more valid if supported by an in vitro approach, and there is a strong positive correlation between in silico and in vitro results, [25, 26]. Therefore, in silico and in vitro approaches are very appropriate for this study. This study aimed to explore the potential bioactive compounds in B. rotunda as anti-breast cancer agents using in silico and in vitro approaches.

2. Methods

2.1. Compound Data Mining

The compounds contained in B. rotunda were obtained from the KNApSAcK database (https://www.knapsackfamily.com/KNApSAcK/) and previous studies. The KNApSAcK is a plant metabolite database containing 20,741 species and 50,048 metabolites [27]. Canonical SMILES of all compounds were obtained from the PubChem database (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).

2.2. Screening Based on Druglikeness and Probable Activity

The compounds contained in B. rotunda obtained from the database were selected by screening using druglikeness and possible bioactivity. Druglikeness screening was conducted using the SWISS ADME web server (https://www.swissadme.ch/) to identify compounds that might have medicinal properties that integrated with those of the Lipinski, Ghose, Veber, Egan, and Muegge rules. Screening for possible activities was conducted to select the compounds that have function to interact with pathway signaling in the cells using the PASS Online web server (https://www.way2drug.com/passonline/). The pathway activity was selected based on their functions as anti-breast cancer agents such as MMP9 expression inhibitor [28], apoptosis agonist [29], JAK2 expression inhibitor [30], antineoplastic (breast cancer) [31] and proliferative disease treatment agent [32], caspase-3 stimulant [33], caspase-8 stimulant [33], topoisomerase I inhibitor [34], topoisomerase II inhibitor [34], cancer-associated disorder treatment agent [35], protein kinase C inhibitor [36], CDC25 phosphatase inhibitor [37], and CDK9/cyclin T1 inhibitor [38].

2.3. Protein Target Prediction

The compounds that met the druglikeness and probable activity parameters were used for target protein prediction. Direct targets were predicted using the SWISS Target Prediction database (https://www.swisstargetprediction.ch/); then, the five proteins that related to breast cancer were taken. SwissTargetPrediction is a web server to accurately predict the target protein based on the similarity of compound structure to a previously known compound [39]. Indirect target proteins were obtained from direct targets using the STRING 11.0 database with a confidence level of 0.4 and a maximum interaction number of 5. STRING is a database that predicts protein-protein interactions computationally [37]. Visualization of the target protein analysis was performed using Cytoscape 3.8.2.

2.4. Functional Annotation

Functional annotation was performed to predict the role of target proteins in cell biology systems using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery web server (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) [40]. The databases used for this analysis were the Gene Ontology (GO) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway databases. The GO database groups genes based on their roles in cells according to three domains, namely, molecular function, biological process, and cellular component [41]. The KEGG pathway is a database that groups genes based on cellular pathways [42].

2.5. Molecular Docking

Molecular docking was conducted between the compound and its direct target protein. The protein’s three-dimensional structure was obtained from the PDB RCSB database (https://www.rcsb.org/). The water molecules and contaminant ligands were removed using the Biovia Discovery Studio 2019 software (Dassault Systèmes Biovia, San Diego, CA, USA). The three-dimensional structure of the compound contained in B. rotunda was obtained from the PubChem database and then was prepared using OpenBabel [43] integrated into the PyRx software. Specific docking was conducted between compounds on the active site of each protein using the AutoDock Vina software integrated into PyRx 0.8 [44, 45]. The docking results were visualized using the Biovia Discovery Studio 2019 software.

2.6. Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Molecular dynamics simulation was conducted using the YASARA (Yet Another Scientific Artificial Reality Application) software with the AMBER14 force field [46]. The system conditions were adjusted according to the physiological conditions of the cells (37°C, pH 7.4, 1 atm, and 0.9% salt content) for 20 ns. The macro programs used were md_run to run simulations, md_analyze to analyze RMSD, and md_bindingenergy to analyze the molecular dynamics binding energy of protein-ligand complexes.

2.7. B. rotunda Extraction

Six grams of powdered B. rotunda (Materia Medika, Batu, East Java, Indonesia) and distilled water or 96% ethanol in a ratio of 1 : 10 were put in a vessel of MAE (microwave-assisted extraction) (Anton-Paar). MAE was operated according to the specified protocol (holding temperature, 50°C; 5 min warming up, 50°C; time holding, 10 min; 5 min cooling down; power, 1500 W). The extract was filtered using the Whatman filter paper and then evaporated using a Buchi R-210 Rotavapor System (50 rpm, 37°C). The obtained extract was stored at 4°C.

2.8. Total Phenol and Flavonoid Analysis

Total phenol analysis was conducted using the Folin–Ciocalteu method with gallic acid as standard. This assay adopted the method of Jing et al. [47]. A total of 100 μL of B. rotunda extract and standard solution (1.5625–100 μg/mL) were added to 1.0 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, which had been diluted 10 times with distilled water. The solution was added with 1 mL of Na₂CO₃ (7.5%, w/v) and incubated in the dark for 90 min at room temperature. Total phenolic content was measured using spectrophotometry at a wavelength of 725 nm. This test was performed in triplicate. Total flavonoid content is expressed in terms of gallic acid equivalent (mgGE/g).

Total flavonoid analysis was conducted using the aluminum chloride colorimetric assay method adopted from Chtatatikun and Chiabchalard [48] and Novia Sembiring et al. [49] with modifications. The standard solution used was quercetin in 96% ethanol. B. rotunda extract (1 mg/mL) and 50 μL standard (1.5625–100 μg/mL) were added to 10 μL AlCl₃ (10%, w/v), followed by the addition of 150 μL 96% ethanol. The 10 μL of 1 M CH₃COONa was added to the solution. The mixture was added to 10 μL of 1 M CH3COONa. A 96% ethanol solution was used as a blank. The mixture was incubated for 40 min at room temperature in the dark. Absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 405 nm. This test was performed in triplicate. Total flavonoid content is presented in terms of quercetin equivalent (mgQE/g).

2.9. DPPH and NO Scavenging Assay

The antioxidant activity of the ethanol extract of B. rotunda was analyzed using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay and ascorbic acid as the standard. One hundred microliters of extract and standard at a concentration of 31.25 to 1000 μg/mL were added to 100 μL of 0.4 M DPPH solution on a 96-well plate. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Absorbance readings were conducted at a wavelength of 490 nm using a ELx880TM microplate reader (BioTek Instrument, USA). This assay was performed in triplicate. The antioxidant activity of the extracts was determined based on the IC₅₀ value.

The antioxidant activity through NO scavenging was analyzed using the NO scavenging assay method with some optimizations [50]. A total of 60 μL of the extract was serially diluted onto a 96-well plate. A total of 60 μL sodium nitroprusside (SNP) at a concentration of 10 mM was added to each well. The control used was SNP only. The SNP was dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline and then incubated at room temperature under bright lighting for 150 min. Griess reagent (5% phosphoric acid, 1% sulfanilamide, and 0.1% naphthyl ethylene diamine dihydrochloride) was added to each well. Absorption readings were conducted at a wavelength of 570 nm using a ELx880TM microplate reader. This assay was performed in three replicates. The NO scavenging activity of the extract was determined based on the IC₅₀ value.

2.10. Cell Culture Preparation

The breast cancer cell line T47D and the human fibroblast cell line TIG-1 were obtained from the Animal Physiology, Structure, and Growth Laboratory, Brawijaya University. The cells were cultured using complete media (RPMI 1640 (Gibco, USA) for T47D and MEM (Gibco, USA) for TIG-1 + 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, USA) + 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco, USA)) on 60 mm dishes. Cells were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO₂.

2.11. Cell Viability Assay

The T47D and TIG-1 cell lines were seeded onto 96-well plates at a density of 7,500 cells per well and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO₂ for 24 h. The cells were treated with aqueous and ethanol extracts of B. rotunda at concentrations of 0, 10, 20, and 40 μg/mL for 24 h. The treatment medium was replaced with a medium containing 5% WST-1 (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and the cells were incubated for 30 min. The absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 450 nm using an ELx880TM absorbance microplate reader. The IC₅₀ value was determined using the inhibition curve. The assay was conducted in triplicate [51].

2.12. Apoptosis Assay

T47D cells were seeded onto 24-well plates (75,000 cells/well) and then incubated for 24 h. The cells were then treated with various doses of ethanol extract of B. rotunda, 0 (untreated), 20, 40, and 80 μg/mL, for 24 h. The cells were harvested and added with annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) (BioLegend, USA) and incubated in the dark at 4°C for 20 min. The cell suspensions were run using the flow cytometer (BD FACSCalibur, USA), and the data analysis was performed using the CellQuest software (BD Bioscience, USA). The analysis was conducted in triplicate [51].

2.13. Rhodamine Assay

The rhodamine assay referred to the method of Wei et al. [52] with some modifications. T47D cells were seeded onto 24-well plates at a density of 75,000 cells/well and then incubated at 37°C and 5% CO₂ for 24 h. The cells were treated with B. rotunda ethanol extract at the concentrations of 0 (untreated), 20, 40, and 80 μg/mL and incubated for 24 h. After incubation, 2 μM rhodamine 123 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was added to each well and the cells were incubated for 1 h at 37°C and 5% CO₂. The cells were harvested and centrifuged at 2500 rpm and 10°C for 5 min. The pellet was resuspended with basal media, incubated for 30 min at room temperature, and then washed with phosphate-buffered saline. The rhodamine 123 staining analysis was conducted using the FACSCalibur analyzer, and the data were obtained using the CellQuest software. The assay was conducted in triplicate.

2.14. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis for rhodamine and apoptosis test results was performed using a one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s HSD as a post hoc test (). Analyses were performed using the SPSS software version 23 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Bioactive Compounds Contained in B. rotunda Based on Database

Based on the KNApSAcK database, there are 20 bioactive compounds in B. rotunda. The compounds contained in B. rotunda are dominated by chalcone and flavonoids. The chalcone compounds in B. rotunda are cardamonin, flavokawin A, boesenbergin A, rubranine, panduratin A, (-)-4-hydroxypanduratin A, isopanduratin A, and pinostrobin chalcone. The flavonoid compounds are sakuranetin, 7-methoxy-5-hydroxy-8-geranylflavanone, alpinetin, 2S-pinocembrin, 5,7-dihydroxy-8-C-geranylflavanone, and 7,4′-dihydroxy-5-methoxyflavanone. The remainder are two terpenes ((E)-geraniol and isopimaric acid), one kavalactone (5,6-dehydrokawain), two benzoic acids ((+)-zeylenol and crotepoxide), and one stilbenes (2,4-dihydroxy-phenethyl-benzoic acid methyl ester) (Table 1 & Figure 1(a)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.2. Screening Based on Druglikeness and Probable Activity

Druglikeness screening aimed to select compounds that have drug-like characteristics. Of the 20 compounds, 11 compounds met the characteristics of medicinal compounds, namely, sakuranetin, cardamonin, flavokawin A, alpinetin, 2S-pinocembrin, 7,4′-dihydroxy-5-methoxyflavanone, 2,4-dihydroxy-6-phenethyl-benzoic acid methyl ester, 5,6-dihydrokawain, (+)-zeylenol, crotepoxide, and pinostrobin chalcone (Figure 1(b)). The eleven compounds were continued to screen for probable bioactivity to predict the possibility of their activity in inhibiting breast cancer progression (Figure 1(c)). In this screening, compounds with a Pa value of more than 0.7 were selected. A Pa value of more than 0.7 indicates the compound has a high potential for carrying out related activities [59]. Of the 11 compounds, 7 compounds had a Pa value always more than 0.7, namely, sakuranetin, cardamonin, alpinetin, 2S-pinocembrin, 7.4′-dihydroxy-5-methoxyflavanone, 5.6-dehydrokawain, and pinostrobin chalcone (Figure 1(d)).

3.3. Protein Target Prediction

The protein target prediction results showed a total of 107 target proteins consisting of 20 direct and 87 indirect targets (Figure 2(a)). The direct targets of sakuranetin are CDK2, ERα, ERβ, and MMP12. The direct targets of cardamonin are EGFR, ERβ, CDK4, and PI3K. Alpinetin’s direct targets are MTOR, ERα, ERβ, JAK2, and JAK3. The direct targets of 2S-pinocembrin are VEGFR2, MMP13, ERα, MMP12, and ERβ. The direct targets of 7,4′-dihydroxy-5-methoxyflavanone are CDK1, PPARG, MMP13, ERα, and ERβ. The direct targets of 5,6-dehydrokawain are EGFR, STAT3, JAK3, MAPK8, and VEGFR1. The direct targets of pinostrobin chalcone are EGFR, AMPK, KCNA3, and PDPK1. Meanwhile, the indirect target is shown in Figure 2(a).

(a)

(b)

(c)

3.4. Functional Annotation

All target proteins have roles in cancer cell progression as shown in Figure 2. Based on the GO analysis, the target proteins have roles in cancer-related biological processes such as epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway, negative regulation of apoptosis, and positive regulation of cell proliferation, among others. All target proteins are mostly located in the cytoplasm, nucleoplasm, and membrane. These proteins functioned in kinase activity, protein kinase binding, protein binding, enzyme binding, and so on (Figure 2(c)). Based on the KEGG pathway, these target proteins play a role in cancer-related pathways such as the PI3K/Akt, FOXO, ErbB, and JAK/STAT signaling pathways (Figure 2(b)). The results of this functional annotation analysis showed that based on the GO and KEGG pathway databases, the target proteins have a cancer-related role.

3.5. Molecular Docking

Molecular docking simulation was conducted on the seven bioactive compounds with direct target proteins, and the results are shown in Table 2. The most negative binding affinity value of docking results was selected for further molecular dynamics simulation. The docking results showed that the seven bioactive compounds contained in B. rotunda bind to their respective target proteins on the same site as the control. This indicates that the compound is predicted to have similar activity to the control. The most negative binding affinity values of docking results are shown in Figure 3. Sakuranetin binds to the active site of MMP12 by forming 2 hydrogen bonds and 2 hydrophobic bonds. Sakuranetin had the same residues as the control, namely, in Ala182, Leu181, and His218. Cardamonin bound to the active site of CDK4 by forming 4 hydrogen bonds and 4 hydrophobic interactions and bound to the same residue as the control, namely, to Val20 and Leu147. Alpinetin formed 1 hydrogen bond and 3 hydrophobic interactions with JAK3. Alpinetin bound to the same residue as the control, namely, to Leu956, Leu828, and Val836.2S-Pinocembrin bound to the active site of VEGFR2 by forming 1 hydrogen bond and 6 hydrophobic interactions. This compound formed bonds at the same residue as the control, namely, at Leu840, Val848, Phe104, Leu1035, and Cys1045. 7,4′-Hydroxy-5-methoxyflavanone binds to the active site of MMP13 by forming 2 hydrogens and 6 hydrophobic interactions. This compound contains the same residues as the control, namely, Thr224, Met232, Tyr223, Leu197, His201, and Val198. 5,6-Dehydrokawain bound to the VEGFR1 active site by forming 1 hydrogen and 9 hydrophobic interactions. 5,6-Dehydrokawain binds to the same residues as the control, namely, to Val841, Ala859, Cys912, Leu1029, Lys861, Val909, and Asp1040. Pinostrobin chalcone binds to KCNA3 by forming 2 hydrogens and 2 hydrophobic interactions. This compound only binds to the same residue as the control, namely, to Glu168.

3.6. Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Molecular dynamics simulations were performed to analyze the stability of the interaction between proteins and B. rotunda compounds. The parameters used in this simulation are protein-ligand complex RMSD, ligand movement RMSD, and molecular dynamics binding energy. The protein-ligand complex RMSD represents the stability of the complex during a 20 ns simulation. The complex RMSD results showed that all compounds had stable values similar to the control and all complexes had RMSD values below 3 Å, which means they are stable [60, 61] (Figure 4). Ligand movement RMSD represents the stability of ligands when interacting with proteins. The ligand is in a stable state if it does not move much during the simulation, which is indicated by a stable ligand movement RMSD value. The results showed that almost all compounds in B. rotunda had stable ligand movement RMSD similar to the control. Sakuranetin has a more stable RMSD value than the control. Ligand movement RMSD of alpinetin upon binding to JAK3 increased at ∼10 ns but stabilized from ∼12 ns until the end of the simulation (Figure 5). Molecular dynamics binding energy also represents the stability of the protein-ligand interaction; the more positive the binding energy value, the more stable the protein-ligand interaction [62]. Overall, the molecular dynamics binding energy results showed that all protein complexes in B. rotunda were stable. Complexes of CDK4-cardamonin, VEGFR1-5,6-dyhidrokawain, VEGFR2-2S-pinocembrin, and KCNA3-pinostrobin chalcone tend to be stable because their binding energy values do not fluctuate much, but their stability is still below the control protein complex. The MMP12-sakuranetin and MMP13-7.4′-dihydroxy-5-methoxyflavanone complexes have high interaction stability because their binding energy is almost the same as that of the control. The JAK3-alpinetin complex is very stable because it has a more positive binding affinity value than the control (Figure 6). Overall, molecular dynamics simulations showed that the interactions between proteins and compounds contained in B. rotunda are stable and that these compounds have a high potential to act as inhibitors of related proteins.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

3.7. Total Phenol and Flavonoid of B. rotunda Extracts

Total phenol and flavonoid assays were conducted to predict the presence of potentially bioactive compounds (based on in silico results) in the extracts used because most of these potential compounds belong to the phenolic and flavonoid groups. The results showed differences in total phenols and flavonoids in the aqueous and ethanol extracts of B. rotunda. Total phenol in the ethanol extract was much higher (25.04 mg GAE/g) than in the aqueous extract (0.57 mg·GAE/g). The total flavonoid in the ethanol extract was also higher (4.52 mg·QE/g) than in the aqueous extract (1.40 mg·QE/g) (Figure 7(a)). These results indicate that phenolic and flavonoid compounds that have potential as anti-breast cancer agents are predicted to be more abundant in the ethanol extract of B. rotunda.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

Figure 7

Anticancer activity of B. rotunda extract. (a) Total phenol and flavonoid water and ethanol extracts of B. rotunda. (b) IC₅₀ values for DPPH and NO scavenging tests on aqueous and ethanol extracts of B. rotunda. (c) Toxicity test of aqueous and ethanol extracts of B. rotunda on the cell line T47D. (d) and (f) Rhodamine 123 test results. (e) and (g) Apoptotic test results with annexin V and PI. Different letters in bar indicate significant difference at . Each value represents the average of three experiments.

3.8. Antioxidant Activity of B. rotunda Extracts

The antioxidant assay results confirmed the total phenol and flavonoid results. The results of the antioxidant activity test using the DPPH and NO scavenging assay showed that the ethanol extract of B. rotunda had better antioxidant activity than the aqueous extract. The IC₅₀ value of the DPPH test for the ethanol extract was 602 ± 3.00 ppm, while that of the water extract was 5072.13 ± 28.5 ppm. The NO scavenging activity of the ethanol extract was also higher than that of the aqueous extract. The ethanol extract had an IC₅₀ value of 6.93 ± 3.46 ppm, while that of the water extract was 11.20 ± 0.43 ppm. These results indicate that the ethanol extract of B. rotunda has more antioxidant compounds than the water extract (Figure 7(b)).

3.9. Toxicity of the Extracts to the T47D Breast Cancer Cell Line

The toxicity assay aimed to analyze the toxic effect of the extract on T47D cells, and the results are shown in Figure 7(c). The IC₅₀ value determines this toxic effect. The results showed that the ethanol extract of B. rotunda was much more toxic to T47D cells with an IC₅₀ value of 40.4 μg/mL than the aqueous extracts with an IC₅₀ value of 355.5 μg/mL. Both aqueous and ethanolic extracts of B. rotunda were not toxic to TIG-1 cells, characterized by a high IC₅₀ value. From the results of this toxicity test, it can be determined that the ethanol extract of 40.4 μg/mL B. rotunda can reduce the viability of the T47D cell population by half and is specific for cancer cells. However, it is not known whether the cell death caused by this extract is necrotic or apoptotic. Rhodamine and apoptosis tests are necessary to determine the type of cell death.

3.10. Ethanol Extract of B. rotunda Induced Loss of MMP in T47D Cells

The effect of the ethanol extract of B. rotunda on the mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) was evaluated using rhodamine 123 (Figures 7(d) and 7(f)). Rhodamine 123 is a green fluorescent dye used to stain mitochondria with MMP, which indicates that the cells are viable. Cells are deprived of MMP that were not get stained by rhodamine 123, indicating that the cells are not viable [63]. The results showed that the higher the dose of B. rotunda ethanol extract, the more cells lost MMP. The number of cells that lost MMP increased significantly with the increasing dose of the extract.

3.11. Ethanol Extract of B. rotunda Induced Apoptosis of T47D Cells

The effect of apoptotic induction of B. rotunda ethanol extract on T47D cells was evaluated using annexin V and PI (Figures 7(e) and 7(g)). Annexin V detects apoptosis by binding to phosphatidylserine, which is exposed to extracellular sites when cells undergo apoptosis and PI detects necrosis by binding to DNA [64]. The results showed that the number of T47D cells undergoing apoptosis increased with increasing extract dose, although it was not significant between doses of 20 and 40 μg/mL. The number of necrotic cells was not significantly different between the control and the treatment, which indicated that the extract did not significantly cause necrosis in T47D cells.

4. Discussion

Based on the KNApSAcK database, B. rotunda contains bioactive compounds, which are dominated by phenol group compounds, namely, chalcone and flavonoids (Figure 1(a)). These phenolic compounds are predicted to have anti-breast cancer effects. The content of phenolic compounds and flavonoids in the ethanol extract of B. rotunda was higher than that of the aqueous extract (Figure 7(a)). Therefore, the compounds contained in B. rotunda obtained from the database are most likely present in the ethanol extract. These results are supported by antioxidant tests using DPPH and NO scavenging assays, where ethanol extract has higher antioxidant activity than aqueous extract (Figure 7(b)). This higher antioxidant activity is most likely caused by the more significant number of phenolic compounds present in the ethanol extract. Compounds in B. rotunda with high antioxidant activity are pinostrobin chalcone, alpinetin, and cardamonin [65, 66]. This result is in line with that in previous studies, which state that extraction with ethanol solvent can obtain more phenolic compounds than extraction with water solvent. [67].

Drug likeness and bioactivity pathway prediction were used to select the active compounds of B. rotunda that have potential as anticancer agents. Seven compounds selected are sakuranetin, cardamonin, alpinetin, 2S-pinocembrin 7.4′-dihydroxy-5-methoxyflavanone, 5.6-dehydrokawain, and pinostrobin chalcone. Some of these bioactive compounds have been known to have anticancer activity in previous studies, but the molecular mechanism is partly unknown. Sakuranetin isolated from Artemisia dracunculus inhibits the proliferation of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells via induction of DNA damage and mitochondrial membrane potential loss [68]. Cardamonin and alpinetin can suppress proliferation and induce apoptosis of prostate and ovarian cancer cells by modulating the STAT3 pathway [69, 70]. Pinostrobin chalcone and 5,6-dehydrokawain have antiproliferative effects on various cancer cell lines [71, 72]. Research on the anticancer effects of 2S-pinocembrin and 7.4′-dihydroxy-5-methoxyflavanone is still very limited. In addition, the combination of these compounds in inhibiting the growth of breast cancer has not been explained. This study describes how these seven potential compounds work together to provide an anti-breast cancer effect.

Direct and indirect target proteins of the seven compounds contained in B. rotunda were closely related to breast cancer progression. These proteins have a role in signaling pathways related to breast cancer. The PI3K/Akt and mTOR signaling pathways are activated by receptor tyrosine kinases that lead to tumor cell growth and proliferation [73]. The FOXO signaling pathway plays a role in tumor suppression. The FOXO protein regulates the expression of genes important for tumor cell growth, such as p27, CDKN1B, TNFSF10, and GADD45 [74]. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway is activated by receptor tyrosine kinases such as EGFR and interleukin receptor, which activate the STAT3 protein. STAT3 is a transcription factor for breast cancer proliferation-associated genes such as CCND1, c-myc, BCL2, and BAX [75]. ERα and ERβ are involved in the estrogen signaling pathway. ERα and ERβ are activated after binding to estrogen, form dimers, and bind to target genes such as CCND1, HIF1A, and IL6, which have a role in breast cancer proliferation [7]. The Wnt signaling pathway is activated when the Wnt ligand binds to the LRP and Frizzled protein complex, thereby activating catenin, which in turn regulates transcription of c-myc, CCND1, MMP7, and CD44 [76]. The MAPK pathway enhances the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to estradiol so that cells grow faster [77]. The VEGF signaling pathway induces angiogenesis in breast cancer [78]. The results of the functional annotation with the KEGG pathway are in line with those of the GO analysis. The interaction between the compounds contained in B. rotunda and the target proteins will potentially affect these pathways.

The interaction between sakuranetin and MMP12 has a low binding affinity value. In addition, the interaction between and 7.4′-dihydroxy-5-methoxyflavanone and MMP13 also has a low binding affinity value. Interestingly, theses interactions have stability as same as the control. Therefore, the two compounds were predicted to be high in inhibiting the activity of MMP12 and MMP13 proteins, respectively. MMPs have a role as metastasis-promoting enzymes by degrading all extracellular matrix proteins [79]. MMP12 was highly expressed in various tumor cell comparisons with normal epithelial cells and positively correlated with cancer cell invasion [80]. MMP12 inactivation could inhibit lung adenocarcinoma cells’ growth, invasion, and metastasis [81, 82]. MMP13 has significantly increased expression in breast cancer tissue and is predicted to play a significant role in tumor invasion and metastasis [83]. Previous studies have shown that inhibition of MMP13 activity causes inhibition of the growth of the breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 and 4T1.2 [84]. Based on this explanation, it was stated that the inhibition of the MMP12 and MMP13 activities correlated with the inhibition of cancer cell growth. This was confirmed in this study, which showed that the higher the dose of B. rotunda extract, the lower the number of cells (Figure 7(c)). However, the molecular mechanism related to apoptosis caused by MMP12 and MMP13 inhibition needs further research.

Angiogenesis-related proteins are also significant targets of compounds in B. rotunda. 5,6-Dehydrokawain and 2S-pinocembrin stably bind to VEGFR1 and VEGFR2, respectively. Based on its binding position, the two compounds have high potential as inhibitors of the two proteins. VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 are receptors of the VEGF ligand that have a role in angiogenesis. VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 are overexpressed in breast cancer cells [85, 86]. Previous studies have shown that the inhibition of these two receptors not only inhibits angiogenesis but also cell growth and induces cancer cell apoptosis. Inhibition of VEGFR1 can inhibit angiogenesis in mouse models of breast cancer and decrease the viability of various breast cancer cell lines such as CAL-120, JIMT-1, MCF-7, and MDA-MB-134 [87]. Another study stated that the inhibition of VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 could inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of cancer cells through regulation of the PI3K/Akt and MAPK pathways [88]. Inhibition of VEGF signaling reduces pPI3K and pAKT, which are important proteins in the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, which causes cells to undergo apoptosis [89]. The inhibition of VEGFR1/2 from in silico studies that resulted in decreased cell viability and induction of apoptosis was confirmed by in vitro results (Figures 7(c)–7(e))

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) is a protein that plays an important role in cell cycle regulation. The docking and MD results indicated that cardamonin interacted stably at the abemaciclib binding site of CDK4. This similar interaction with the control indicates cardamonin has potential as a CDK4 inhibitor [61]. In general, cyclin D is overexpressed in breast cancer cells, but it requires CDK4 to perform its function, namely, as a cell cycle regulator [90]. When the CDK4-cyclin D complex is activated, the complex phosphorylates retinoblastoma (RB), which makes RB released from the E2F transcription factor, and then, E2F binds to DNA and initiates transcription of genes needed to enter the S phase [91]. Therefore, CDK4 inhibition can cause cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase [92]. In addition, CDK4 inhibition can also cause cancer cell apoptosis. Previous studies have shown that CDK4 inhibition can reduce NF-kB activity, resulting in downregulation of antiapoptotic genes [93]. This mechanism may also occur in T47D cells treated with B. rotunda extract, but further research is needed.

The JAK/STAT pathway has a crucial role in the development and progression of breast cancer [12]. This study showed that there were compounds bound to JAK3 and STAT3 that are predicted to inhibit the activity of these two proteins. The lowest binding affinity value is in the interaction between alpinetin and JAK3. The MD results also show that the interaction between the two is stable. Therefore, alpinetin in B. rotunda has high potential as a JAK3 inhibitor. JAK3 activated by receptor tyrosine kinase will activate STAT3, and then, STAT3 forms a dimer and translocates to the nucleus to become a transcription factor related to cell proliferation and survival [75]. Therefore, inhibition of this pathway can induce cancer cell apoptosis. Previous research stated that JAK and STAT inhibition resulted in the apoptosis of MCF-7 breast cancer cells [94].

The anticancer effect of B. rotunda predicted by the in silico approach was confirmed by the in vitro approach. The ethanol extract of B. rotunda has an IC₅₀ value of 40.4 μg/mL for T47D and 292.7 μg/mL for TIG-1. The result indicates that B. rotunda has potential for selective killing between cancer (T47D) and normal (TIG-1) cells. The effect of inducing apoptosis in B. rotunda ethanol extract on T47D cells was measured by the rhodamine 123 and apoptosis (annexin V/PI) assays. These results are in line with those of the in silico method in which the compounds in B. rotunda can inhibit the activity of proteins related to cell survival and antiapoptosis. The apoptotic effect of the B. rotunda ethanol extract was presented in the rhodamine 123 assay and the apoptosis assay. The results showed that the cells lost their mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) when treated with B. rotunda ethanol extract. Loss of MMP is an important step in inducing apoptosis because it can facilitate cytochrome c exit from the mitochondria and activate apoptotic signaling [95]. The decrease in MMP was predicted due to the inhibition of KCNA3 activity by pinostrobin chalcone. KCNA3 is a mitochondrial ion channel that controls the mitochondrial membrane potential [96]. Apoptosis of T47D cells due to B. rotunda extract was also demonstrated in this study (Figures 7(e) and 7(g)). The apoptosis of T47D is predicted to be due to seven bioactive compounds from B. rotunda that interact with breast cancer-related proteins. However, this study shows that several compounds have the potential for antiangiogenesis and antitumor invasion. Further studies are needed on the antiangiogenesis and anti-invasion effects of B. rotunda extract on breast cancer cells.

5. Conclusion

This study focused on predicting the potential anticancer mechanism of B. rotunda against breast cancer cell line using an in silico approach. B. rotunda contains seven compounds that are predicted to have anticancer effects: sakuranetin, cardamonin, alpinetin, 2S-pinocembrin 7.4′-dihydroxy-5-methoxyflavanone, 5.6-dehydrokawain, and pinostrobin chalcone. These compounds are predicted to stably interact with the MMP12, CDK4, JAK3, VEGFR2, MMP13, VEGFR1, and KCNA3 proteins, which have a role in inhibiting the growth and inducing apoptosis in breast cancer cells. The predicted anticancer activity results were confirmed by in vitro assays where B. rotunda extract was shown to be toxic and induce apoptosis of T47D cells. However, further experimental studies are needed to support these findings. This study provides an important basis for further research, considering that the in silico results predicted that the compounds in B. rotunda targeted multiple pathways related to breast cancer progression.

Data Availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Laboratory of Structure, Development, and Physiology of Animals, Biology Department, Science and Mathematics Faculty, Brawijaya University, for giving facility needed for this research. This research was funded by the Ministry of Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia.

References

H. Sung, J. Ferlay, R. L. Siegel et al., “Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 209–249, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. D. Miller, M. Fidler-Benaoudia, T. H. Keegan, H. S. Hipp, A. Jemal, and R. L. Siegel, “Cancer statistics for adolescents and young adults, 2020,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 443–459, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Azamjah, Y. Soltan-Zadeh, and F. Zayeri, “Global trend of breast cancer mortality rate: a 25-year study,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 2015–2020, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Dumalaon-Canaria, A. D. Hutchinson, I. Prichard, and C. Wilson, “What causes breast cancer? a systematic review of causal attributions among breast cancer survivors and how these compare to expert-endorsed risk factors,” Cancer Causes & Control, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 771–785, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Paul, T. c Pan, D. K. Pant et al., “Genomic landscape of metastatic breast cancer identifies preferentially dysregulated pathways and targets,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 130, no. 8, pp. 4252–4265, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. J. Cheskis, J. G. Greger, S. Nagpal, and L. P. Freedman, “Signaling by estrogens,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 213, no. 3, pp. 610–617, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Feng, M. Spezia, S. Huang et al., “Breast cancer development and progression: risk factors, cancer stem cells, signaling pathways, genomics, and molecular pathogenesis,” Genes & Diseases, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 77–106, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Matthews and J. A. Gustafsson, “Estrogen signaling: a subtle balance between ER and ER,” Molecular Interventions, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 281–292, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Martínez-Sáez, N. Chic, T. Pascual et al., “Frequency and spectrum of PIK3CA somatic mutations in breast cancer,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 45, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Hsu and M. C. Hung, “The role of HER2, EGFR, and other receptor tyrosine kinases in breast cancer,” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 575–588, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Mitri, T. Constantine, and R. O’Regan, “The HER2 receptor in breast cancer: pathophysiology, clinical use, and new advances in therapy,” Chemotherapy Research and Practice, vol. 2012, Article ID 743193, 7 pages, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. G. Yedjou, J. N. Sims, L. Miele et al., “Health and racial disparity in breast cancer,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 1152, pp. 31–49, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
T. A. Moo, R. Sanford, C. Dang, and M. Morrow, “Overview of breast cancer therapy,” PET Clinics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 339–354, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Pearce, M. Haas, R. Viney et al., “Incidence and severity of self-reported chemotherapy side effects in routine care: a prospective cohort study,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 10, Article ID e0184360, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
N. P. Staff, A. Grisold, W. Grisold, and A. J. Windebank, “Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a current review: CIPN,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 772–781, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Nematbakhsh, F. Ashrafi, Z. Pezeshki, Z. Fatahi, F. Kianpoor, and M. H. Sanei, “A histopathological study of nephrotoxicity, hepatoxicity or testicular toxicity: which one is the first observation as side effect of cisplatin-induced toxicity in animal model?” Journal of Nephropathology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 190–193, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mobaraki, “Molecular mechanisms of cardiotoxicity: a review on the major side-effect of doxorubicin,” Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 10, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
M. M. Laterza, B. Chiurazzi, M. Brangi, F. Riccardi, and G. Cartenì, “Gefitinib in non-small cell lung carcinoma: a case report of an unusual side effect and complete Response in advanced disease,” Tumori, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. e3–5, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Eng-Chong, L. Yean-Kee, C. Chin-Fei et al., “Boesenbergia rotunda: from ethnomedicine to drug discovery,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 473637, 25 pages, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. M. Isa, S. I. Abdelwahab, S. Mohan et al., “In vitro anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic and antioxidant activities of boesenbergin A, a chalcone isolated from Boesenbergia rotunda (L.) (fingerroot),” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 524–530, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Listyawati, S. Sismindari, S. Mubarika, Y. B. Murti, and M. Ikawati, “Anti-proliferative activity and apoptosis induction of an ethanolic extract of Boesenbergia pandurata (roxb.) schlecht. Against HeLa and vero cell lines,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 183–187, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Stompor, “A review on sources and pharmacological aspects of sakuranetin,” Nutrients, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 513, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. A. Mohammed, M. N. Akhtar, F. J. Biau et al., “Isolation of cardamonin and pinostrobin chalcone from the rhizomes of Boesenbergia rotunda (L.) mansf. And their cytotoxic effects on H-29 and MDA-MB-231 cancer cell lines,” Natural Products Journal, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 341–348, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Xia, “Bioinformatics and drug discovery,” CTM, vol. 17, no. 15, pp. 1709–1726, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Y. Ansari, A. Equbal, M. R. Dikhit et al., “Establishment of correlation between in-silico and in-vitro test analysis against leishmania HGPRT to inhibitors,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 83, pp. 78–96, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hardjono, S. Siswodihardjo, P. Pramono, and W. Darmanto, “Correlation between in silico and in vitro results of 1-(benzoyloxy)urea and its derivatives as potential anti-cancer drugs,” ChChT, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 19–24, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. M. Afendi, T. Okada, M. Yamazaki et al., “KNApSAcK family databases: integrated metabolite–plant species databases for multifaceted plant research,” Plant and Cell Physiology, vol. 53, no. 2, p. e1, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Merdad, S. Karim, H. J. Schulten et al., “Expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in primary human breast cancer: MMP-9 as a potential biomarker for cancer invasion and metastasis,” Anticancer Research, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1355–1366, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Hu, Y. Xu, L. Meng, L. Huang, and H. Sun, “Curcumin inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis of breast cancer cells,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1266–1272, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. G. Stover, C. R. Gil Del Alcazar, J. Brock et al., “Phase II study of ruxolitinib, a selective JAK1/2 inhibitor, in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer,” Npj Breast Cancer, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 10, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Kubatka, A. Kapinová, P. Kružliak et al., “Antineoplastic effects of Chorella pyrenoidosa in the breast cancer model,” Nutrition, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 560–569, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Okoth, M. Galukande, J. Jombwe, and D. Wamala, “Benign proliferative breast diseases among female patients at a sub Saharan Africa tertiary hospital: a cross sectional study,” BMC Surgery, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 9, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Pu, S. J. Storr, Y. Zhang et al., “Caspase-3 and caspase-8 expression in breast cancer: caspase-3 is associated with survival,” Apoptosis, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 357–368, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Vanderbeeken, P. G. Aftimos, and A. Awada, “Topoisomerase inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer: overview of current practice and future development,” Current Breast Cancer Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31–41, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. G. Waks and E. P. Winer, “Breast cancer treatment: a review,” JAMA, vol. 321, no. 3, p. 288, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Lin, J. Huang, Z. Yuan, S. Feng, Y. Xie, and W. Ma, “Protein kinase C inhibitor chelerythrine selectively inhibits proliferation of triple-negative breast cancer cells,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 2022, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Zacksenhaus, J. C. Liu, L. Granieri et al., “CDC25 as a common therapeutic target for triple-negative breast cancer—the challenges ahead,” Molecular & Cellular Oncology, vol. 5, no. 4, Article ID e1481814, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Cheng, Y. Q. Qu, J. Wu et al., “Inhibition of the CDK9-cyclin T1 protein-protein interaction as a new approach against triple-negative breast cancer,” Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1390–1405, 2022.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Gfeller, A. Grosdidier, M. Wirth, A. Daina, O. Michielin, and V. Zoete, “SwissTargetPrediction: a web server for target prediction of bioactive small molecules,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 42, no. W1, pp. W32–W38, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. J. Dennis, B. T. Sherman, D. A. Hosack et al., “DAVID: database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery,” Genome Biology, vol. 4, no. 9, p. R60, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Ontology Consortium, “The gene ontology (GO) database and informatics resource,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 32, no. 90001, pp. 258D–261, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Du, Z. Yuan, Z. Ma, J. Song, X. Xie, and Y. Chen, “KEGG-PATH: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes-based pathway analysis using a path analysis model,” Molecular BioSystems, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 2441–2447, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. M. O’Boyle, M. Banck, C. A. James, C. Morley, T. Vandermeersch, and G. R. Hutchison, “Open Babel: an open chemical toolbox,” Journal of Cheminformatics, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 33, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Dallakyan and A. J. Olson, “Small-molecule library screening by docking with PyRx,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1263, pp. 243–250, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
O. Trott and A. J. Olson, “AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 455–461, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Krieger and G. Vriend, “YASARA View—molecular graphics for all devices—from smartphones to workstations,” Bioinformatics, vol. 30, no. 20, pp. 2981-2982, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Jing, H. Ma, P. Fan, R. Gao, and Z. Jia, “Antioxidant potential, total phenolic and total flavonoid contents of rhododendron anthopogonoides and its protective effect on hypoxia-induced injury in PC12 cells,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 287–312, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Chatatikun and A. Chiabchalard, “Phytochemical screening and free radical scavenging activities of orange baby carrot and carrot (Daucus carota Linn.) root crude extracts,” Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 97–102, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Novia Sembiring, E. Berna, and R. Sauriasari, “Total flavonoid content total phenolic content,” Pharmacognosy Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 123–127, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
P. J. Tsai, T. H. Tsai, C. H. Yu, and S. C. Ho, “Comparison of NO-scavenging and NO-suppressing activities of different herbal teas with those of green tea,” Food Chemistry, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 181–187, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Widodo, S. Puspitarini, M. H. Widyananda et al., “Anticancer activity of Caesalpinia sappan by downregulating mitochondrial genes in A549 lung cancer cell line,” F1000Research, vol. 11, p. 169, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wei, Y. Zhou, G. Q. Jiang, and D. Xiao, “Silencing of ETS1 reverses adriamycin resistance in MCF-7/ADR cells via downregulation of MDR1,” Cancer Cell International, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 22, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Morikawa, K. Funakoshi, K. Ninomiya et al., “Medicinal foodstuffs. XXXIV. Structures of new prenylchalcones and prenylflavanones with TNF-.ALPHA. And aminopeptidase N inhibitory activities from Boesenbergia rotundflavanones with TNF-a and aminopeptidase N inhibitory activities from Boesenbergia rotunda,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 956–962, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Tuchinda, V. Reutrakul, P. Claeson et al., “Anti-inflammatory cyclohexenyl chalcone derivatives in Boesenbergia pandurata,” Phytochemistry, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 169–173, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Tuntiwachuttikul, O. Pancharoen, W. A. Bubb, T. W. Hambley, W. C. Taylor, and V. Reutrakul, “Constituents of the Zingiberaceae. XI∗ Structures of (+)-(lR, 2S, 3R, 4S)-2-Benzoyloxymethylcyclohex-5-ene-1,2,3,4=tetrol4-Benzoate [(+1-Zeylenol] and (+)-(IR,2R,4R,5S,6R,7 R) 4-Benzoyloxymethyl-3,8-dioxatricyclo [5.1.0.02, 4]octane-5,6-diol 5-Acetate 6-Benzoate (Boesenboxide) Isolated from a New Boesenbergia species,” Australian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 40, pp. 2049–2061, 1987.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Adhikari, D. S. Gong, S. H. Oh et al., “Vasorelaxant effect of Boesenbergia rotunda and its active ingredients on an isolated coronary artery,” Plants, vol. 9, no. 12, p. 1688, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. D. N. Lotulung, Minarti, L. B. S. Kardono, and K. Kawanishi, “Antioxidant compound form rhizomes of Kaempferia rotunda L,” Pakistan Journal of Biological Research, vol. 11, no. 20, pp. 2447–2450, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
O. Pancharoen, K. Picker, V. Reutrakul, W. C. Taylor, and P. Tuntiwachwuttikul, “Constituents of the Zingiberaceae. X. Diastereomers of [7-Hydroxy-5-Methoxy-2-Methyl-2-(4′-Methylpent-3′-Enyl)-2H-Chromen-8-yl] [3″-Methyl-2′-(3′″-Methylbut-2″′-Enyl]-6″-Phenylcyclohex-3″-Enyl]M ethanone (panduratin B), a constituent of the red rhizomes of a variety of Boesenbergia pandurata,” Australian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 40, no. 3, p. 455, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Filimonov, A. A. Lagunin, T. A. Gloriozova et al., “Prediction of the biological activity spectra of organic compounds using the pass online web resource,” Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds (New York, NY, United States)(Translation of Khimiya Geterotsiklicheskikh Soedinenii), vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 444–457, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Martínez, “Automatic identification of mobile and rigid substructures in molecular dynamics simulations and fractional structural fluctuation analysis,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 3, Article ID e0119264, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
T. L. Wargasetia, H. Ratnawati, N. Widodo, and M. H. Widyananda, “Bioinformatics study of sea cucumber peptides as antibreast cancer through inhibiting the activity of overexpressed protein (EGFR, PI3K, AKT1, and CDK4),” Cancer Informatics, vol. 20, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. E. Chen, D. L. Willick, J. B. Ruckel, and W. B. Floriano, “Principal component analysis of binding energies for single-point mutants of hT2R16 bound to an agonist correlate with experimental mutant cell Response,” Journal of Computational Biology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 37–53, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Baracca, G. Sgarbi, G. Solaini, and G. Lenaz, “Rhodamine 123 as a probe of mitochondrial membrane potential: evaluation of proton flux through F0 during ATP synthesis,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Bioenergetics, vol. 1606, pp. 137–46, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Lakshmanan and S. Batra, “Protocol for apoptosis assay by flow cytometry using annexin V staining method,” Bio-Protocol, vol. 3, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
S. I. Abdelwahab, S. Mohan, M. A. Abdulla et al., “The methanolic extract of Boesenbergia rotunda (L.) Mansf. and its major compound pinostrobin induces anti-ulcerogenic property in vivo: possible involvement of indirect antioxidant action,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 963–70, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. T. Lü, Y. L. Zou, R. Deng, and H. Shan, “Extraction, purification and antiradical activities of alpinetin and cardamomin from Alpinia katsumadai hayata,” Asian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 17, pp. 9503–7, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Mohsen and A. S. M. Ammar, “Total phenolic contents and antioxidant activity of corn tassel extracts,” Food Chemistry, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 595–8, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Hong and S. h. Ying, “Ethanol extract and isolated constituents from Artemisia dracunculus inhibit esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and induce apoptotic cell death,” Drug Research, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 101–6, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhang, S. Sikka, K. S. Siveen et al., “Cardamonin represses proliferation, invasion, and causes apoptosis through the modulation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 pathway in prostate cancer,” Apoptosis, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 158–68, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhao, X. Guo, J. Shen, and D. Hua, “Alpinetin inhibits proliferation and migration of ovarian cancer cells via suppression of STAT3 signaling,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 4030–4036, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. A. R. Junior, D. B. Gomes, B. Zanchet et al., “Antiproliferative effects of pinostrobin and 5, 6-dehydrokavain isolated from leaves of Alpinia zerumbet,” Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 592–8, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. N. A. Malek, C. W. Phang, H. Ibrahim, N. Abdul Wahab, and K. S. Sim, “Phytochemical and cytotoxic investigations of Alpinia mutica rhizomes,” Molecules, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 583–9, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Paplomata and R. O’Regan, “The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in breast cancer: targets, trials and biomarkers,” Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 154–66, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Bullock, “FOXO factors and breast cancer: outfoxing endocrine resistance,” Endocrine-Related Cancer, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. R113–30, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. h. Ma, L. Qin, and X. Li, “Role of STAT3 signaling pathway in breast cancer,” Cell Communication and Signaling, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 33, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Xu, M. Zhang, F. Xu, and S. Jiang, “Wnt signaling in breast cancer: biological mechanisms, challenges and opportunities,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 165, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Yue, J. P. Wang, M. Conaway, S. Masamura, Y. Li, and R. J. Santen, “Activation of the MAPK pathway enhances sensitivity of MCF-7 breast cancer cells to the mitogenic effect of estradiol,” Endocrinology, vol. 143, no. 9, pp. 3221–9, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Guo, L. S. Colbert, M. Fuller, Y. Zhang, and R. R. Gonzalez-Perez, “Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 in breast cancer,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Reviews on Cancer, vol. 1806, no. 1, pp. 108–21, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Decock, S. Thirkettle, L. Wagstaff, and D. R. Edwards, “Matrix metalloproteinases: protective roles in cancer,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1254–65, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Han, S. Zhang, L. Zhang, and Q. Hao, “The overexpression and predictive significance of MMP-12 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma,” Pathology, Research & Practice, vol. 213, no. 12, pp. 1519–22, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Y. Hung, W. J. Lee, G. Z. Cheng et al., “Blocking MMP-12-modulated epithelial-mesenchymal transition by repurposing penfluridol restrains lung adenocarcinoma metastasis via uPA/uPAR/TGF-β/Akt pathway,” Cellular Oncology, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1087–103, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Z. Lv, J. L. Wang, Y. Wu, H. F. Chen, and X. Y. Shen, “Knockdown of MMP12 inhibits the growth and invasion of lung adenocarcinoma cells,” International Journal of Immunopathology & Pharmacology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 77–84, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kotepui, C. Punsawad, C. Chupeerach, A. Songsri, L. Charoenkijkajorn, and S. Petmitr, “Differential expression of matrix metalloproteinase-13 in association with invasion of breast cancer,” Contemporary Oncology, vol. 3, pp. 225–8, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Shah, D. Huang, T. Blick et al., “An MMP13-selective inhibitor delays primary tumor growth and the onset of tumor-associated osteolytic lesions in experimental models of breast cancer,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 1, Article ID e29615, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Srabovic, Z. Mujagic, J. Mujanovic-Mustedanagic et al., “Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 expression in breast cancer and its correlation to vascular endothelial growth factor A,” International Journal of Breast Cancer, vol. 2013, Article ID 746749, 6 pages, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. D. Yan, Y. Liu, Z. Y. Zhang et al., “Expression and prognostic significance of VEGFR-2 in breast cancer,” Pathology, Research & Practice, vol. 211, no. 7, pp. 539–43, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Golfmann, L. Meder, M. Koker et al., “Synergistic anti-angiogenic treatment effects by dual FGFR1 and VEGFR1 inhibition in FGFR1-amplified breast cancer,” Oncogene, vol. 37, no. 42, pp. 5682–93, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sadremomtaz, K. Mansouri, G. Alemzadeh, M. Safa, A. E. Rastaghi, and S. M. Asghari, “Dual blockade of VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 by a novel peptide abrogates VEGF-driven angiogenesis, tumor growth, and metastasis through PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK1/2 pathway,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—General Subjects, vol. 1862, no. 12, pp. 2688–700, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Peng, Q. Zhang, J. Li et al., “Apatinib inhibits VEGF signaling and promotes apoptosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, no. 13, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Yu, E. Sicinska, Y. Geng et al., “Requirement for CDK4 kinase function in breast cancer,” Cancer Cell, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Pernas, S. M. Tolaney, E. P. Winer, and S. Goel, “CDK4/6 inhibition in breast cancer: current practice and future directions,” Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, vol. 10, Article ID 175883591878645, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. G. Murphy and M. N. Dickler, “The role of CDK4/6 inhibition in breast cancer,” Oncologist, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 483–90, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. C. Thoms, M. G. Dunlop, and L. A. Stark, “CDK4 inhibitors and apoptosis: a novel mechanism requiring nucleolar targeting of RelA,” Cell Cycle, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1293–7, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Fu, Y. Li, S. Yang et al., “Angelica sinensis polysaccharide promotes apoptosis by inhibiting JAK/STAT pathway in breast cancer cells,” Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2247–53, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Shi, Y. Zhao, Y. Jiao, T. Shi, and X. Yang, “ROS-dependent mitochondria molecular mechanisms underlying antitumor activity of pleurotus abalonus acidic polysaccharides in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 5, Article ID e64266, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Prosdocimi, V. Checchetto, and L. Leanza, “Targeting the mitochondrial potassium channel Kv1.3 to kill cancer cells: drugs, strategies, and new perspectives,” SLAS Discovery, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 882–92, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Muhammad Hermawan Widyananda et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1166

Downloads

951

Citations