Research Article
Improved Instance Selection Methods for Support Vector Machine Speed Optimization
Table 6
Comparison between techniques.
| Total email | Technique | APA (%) | GB | FP (%) | FN (%) | (%) | Pr (%) | FM (%) | (s) |
| 4000 | EISA | 100 | 100 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 191.62 | 4000 | Clustering | 99.98 | 100 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 100 | 99.80 | 99.80 | 1438.39 | 4000 | KNN | 99.78 | 100 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 100 | 98.27 | 99.12 | 47.73 | 4000 | FFA | 99.55 | 100 | 0.26 | 1.80 | 98.20 | 98.29 | 98.13 | 45.94 | 4000 | FFA_Clus | 99.98 | 100 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 100 | 99.80 | 99.90 | 29.66 | 4000 | SVM | 99.98 | 100 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 100 | 99.86 | 99.93 | 2544.72 |
|
|
Key: GB: global best, APA: average prediction accuracy, FP: false positive, FN: false negative, : recall, Pr: precision, FM: -measure, and : time.
|