State-Based Switching for Optimal Control of Computer Virus Propagation with External Device Blocking

<div>Comparison of <svg height="11.8174pt" id="M207" style="vertical-align:-3.1815pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 14.4921 11.8174" width="14.4921pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M743 375C743 570 607 650 407 650H136L130 622C214 612 220 606 204 526L125 122C110 43 105 36 24 27L17 0H250C382 0 482 23 571 76C680 141 743 248 743 375ZM644 379C644 188 520 36 305 36C277 36 249 38 229 46C205 55 202 71 212 126L293 553C300 588 306 600 317 606C330 613 356 617 390 617C547 617 644 537 644 379Z" id="g113-69"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,9.893,3.132)"><path d="M418 650H141L133 618C225 611 232 604 218 531L141 120C126 45 119 37 33 32L24 0H301L308 32C220 37 214 44 227 120L305 531C319 605 325 611 411 618L418 650Z" id="g50-74"></path></g></svg> in proportion with different control approaches.</div>

Security and Communication Networks

fig3

Figure 3

Figure 3: State-Based Switching for Optimal Control of Computer Virus Propagation with External Device Blocking 