Research Article
Jamming Prediction for Radar Signals Using Machine Learning Methods
Table 5
Test accuracy (%) of known types and unknown types.
| ā | DNN/EF | LSTM model | Known types | Unknown types | Known types | Unknown types |
| 1 | 98.49 | 93.33 | 99.72 | 97.20 | 2 | 98.35 | 92.47 | 99.70 | 95.09 | 3 | 98.49 | 90.57 | 98.78 | 90.76 | 4 | 98.60 | 92.81 | 99.06 | 90.94 | 5 | 98.61 | 92.72 | 99.32 | 93.42 | 6 | 98.55 | 94.31 | 99.60 | 95.06 | 7 | 98.39 | 92.62 | 99.71 | 96.73 | 8 | 98.47 | 92.11 | 99.01 | 89.69 | 9 | 98.31 | 92.19 | 99.00 | 90.64 | 10 | 98.33 | 91.32 | 99.65 | 95.76 | Avg. | 98.46 | 92.45 | 99.36 | 93.53 |
|
|