Research Article
An Efficient and Effective Approach for Flooding Attack Detection in Optical Burst Switching Networks
Table 3
Rank score of IG feature selection method for all features in the dataset.
| Feature name | Feature no. | Average rank | Average merit |
| Packet received | 13 | 1.8 ± 1.17 | 1.402 ± 0.079 | 10-run-AVG-drop-rate | 17 | 4.1 ± 1.64 | 1.306 ± 0.06 | Flood status | 21 | 4.2 ± 1.78 | 1.309 ± 0.052 | Used bandwidth | 9 | 4.3 ± 3.66 | 1.285 ± 0.191 | 10-run-AVG-bandwidth-use | 18 | 4.3 ± 1.62 | 1.282 ± 0.122 | Received byte | 16 | 5.3 ± 3.35 | 1.241 ± 0.163 | Packet lost | 14 | 6.7 ± 3.32 | 1.175 ± 0.15 | Packet drop rate | 3 | 9.3 ± 2 | 1.053 ± 0.083 | Packet received rate | 8 | 9.8 ± 1.6 | 1.018 ± 0.043 | Percentage of lost byte rate | 7 | 9.8 ± 1.08 | 1.018 ± 0.044 | Utilized bandwidth rate | 2 | 10 ± 2.32 | 1.05 ± 0.074 | Percentage of lost packet rate | 6 | 10.8 ± 1.08 | 1.009 ± 0.017 | Average delay time | 5 | 12 ± 2.79 | 0.9 ± 0.19 | Reserved bandwidth | 10 | 12.8 ± 1.66 | 0.899 ± 0.1 | Node status | 20 | 14.9 ± 0.3 | 0.488 ± 0.004 | 10-run-delay | 19 | 16.2 ± 0.98 | 0.36 ± 0.104 | Full bandwidth | 4 | 17.2 ± 0.6 | 0.146 ± 0.007 | Transmitted byte | 15 | 17.7 ± 0.46 | 0.146 ± 0.007 | Packet transmitted | 12 | 18.8 ± 0.6 | 0.146 ± 0.007 | Node | 1 | 20.1 ± 0.3 | 0.017 ± 0.006 | Packet size byte | 11 | 20.9 ± 0.3 | 0 ± 0 |
|
|