Research Article
GTF: An Adaptive Network Anomaly Detection Method at the Network Edge
Table 5
Comparison of metrics obtained by different methods for UNSW-NB15. The results are expressed in %, and
means
in class
.
| Model | Overall | Individual | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Baseline | 91.11 | 70.27 | 84.83 | 84.95 | 5.78 | 8.79 | 69.19 | 0 | 40.33 | 32.78 | 41.18 | 98.18 |
| GTF | 92.02 | 69.87 | 82.44 | 84.13 | 11.57 | 24.91 | 69.42 | 3.14 | 38.37 | 36.36 | 47.78 | 98.35 | GT(F) | 90.34 | 66.42 | 82.12 | 82.81 | 8.62 | 23.32 | 68.07 | 2.18 | 37.13 | 28.87 | 39.31 | 98.18 |
| TabTransformer | 84.59 | 69.59 | 84.92 | 84.13 | 0 | 26.35 | 69.97 | 0 | 38.61 | 0 | 0 | 98.14 | GBDT2NN | 70.36 | 55.42 | 77.87 | 25.93 | 3.25 | 22.30 | 58.38 | 5.50 | 26.47 | 0 | 0.67 | 92.63 | CatBoost | 91.22 | 70.13 | 85.16 | 84.02 | 0.34 | 1.11 | 68.28 | 0 | 40.39 | 0 | 31.19 | 98.05 | FLAGB | 91.04 | 70.17 | 84.87 | 85.01 | 5.24 | 8.61 | 68.93 | 0 | 40.14 | 43.75 | 39.44 | 98.15 | SPE | 90.95 | 56.55 | 73.76 | 61.46 | 10.66 | 24.00 | 60.79 | 8.84 | 33.31 | 7.07 | 11.57 | 97.80 |
|
|
Bold values represent top‐2 results.
|