Research Article
Robust Frame Duplication Detection for Degraded Videos
Table 11
The comparison results for the INT95 group.
| | | v01 | v02 | v03 | v04 | v05 | v06 | v07 | v08 | v09 | v10 | v11 | v12 | v13 | Average |
| | Precision | Ours | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.16 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.88 | | Farid [8] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.62 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.23 |
| | Recall | Ours | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.23 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.86 | | Farid [8] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.55 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 0.18 |
| | F1-score | Ours | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.27 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.38 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.38 | 0.81 | | Farid [8] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.57 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.19 |
|
|
