Research Article
Robust Frame Duplication Detection for Degraded Videos
Table 3
The comparison results for the MCOMP100 group.
| | | v01 | v02 | v03 | v04 | v05 | v06 | v07 | v08 | v09 | v10 | v11 | v12 | v13 | Average |
| | Precision | Ours | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.22 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.21 | 0.88 | | Farid [8] | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.60 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.85 |
| | Recall | Ours | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.99 | | Farid [8] | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.55 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.30 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.77 |
| | F1-score | Ours | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.34 | 0.90 | | Farid [8] | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.55 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.46 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.79 |
|
|
