Research Article
Robust Frame Duplication Detection for Degraded Videos
Table 4
The comparison results for the MCOMP80 group.
| | | v01 | v02 | v03 | v04 | v05 | v06 | v07 | v08 | v09 | v10 | v11 | v12 | v13 | Average |
| | Precision | Ours | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.12 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.09 | 0.82 | | Farid [8] | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.34 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.44 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.76 |
| | Recall | Ours | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 | | Farid [8] | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.33 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.83 |
| | F1-score | Ours | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.22 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.17 | 0.84 | | Farid [8] | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.32 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.78 |
|
|
