Research Article
Robust Frame Duplication Detection for Degraded Videos
Table 5
The comparison results for the MCOMP60 group.
| | | v01 | v02 | v03 | v04 | v05 | v06 | v07 | v08 | v09 | v10 | v11 | v12 | v13 | Average |
| | Precision | Ours | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.16 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.37 | 0.85 | | Farid [8] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.38 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.54 |
| | Recall | Ours | 0.87 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.92 | | Farid [8] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.38 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.50 |
| | F1-score | Ours | 0.93 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.28 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.85 | | Farid [8] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.38 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.51 |
|
|
