Research Article
Robust Frame Duplication Detection for Degraded Videos
Table 9
The comparison results for the INT99 group.
| | | v01 | v02 | v03 | v04 | v05 | v06 | v07 | v08 | v09 | v10 | v11 | v12 | v13 | Average |
| | Precision | Ours | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.09 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.09 | 0.86 | | Farid [8] | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.67 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.34 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.72 |
| | Recall | Ours | 0.94 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.95 | | Farid [8] | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.94 | 0.75 | 0.36 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.50 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.74 |
| | F1-score | Ours | 0.97 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.17 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.17 | 0.85 | | Farid [8] | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.78 | 0.86 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.54 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.72 |
|
|
