Research Article
[Retracted] English Teaching Evaluation Model Based on Association Rule Algorithm and Machine Learning
Table 2
Experts’ views on the importance of the three-level indicators of English teaching evaluation.
| Three-level indicator | Relative importance | Total | Full score | Ratio | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Reasonable writing of lesson plans C11 | 3 | 5 | 2 | | | 41 | 50 | 0.82 | Reasonable design of teaching methods C12 | 5 | 1 | 4 | | | 41 | 50 | 0.82 | Textbook resources are well prepared C13 | 4 | 3 | 3 | | | 41 | 50 | 0.82 | Fully understand the situation of students in teaching C14 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | 41 | 50 | 0.82 | Interesting teaching content C21 | 5 | 1 | 4 | | | 41 | 50 | 0.82 | English course progress is reasonable C22 | 8 | 1 | 1 | | | 47 | 50 | 0.94 | The teaching content has a large amount of information C23 | 7 | 3 | | | | 47 | 50 | 0.94 | Correct teaching content C24 | 5 | 4 | 1 | | | 44 | 50 | 0.88 | Novel teaching content C25 | 3 | 5 | 2 | | | 41 | 50 | 0.82 | Teachers are proficient in basic teaching skills C31 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | 41 | 50 | 0.82 | Be on time for class and end of get out of class C32 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | | 34 | 50 | 0.68 | Active classroom atmosphere C33 | 4 | 3 | 3 | | | 41 | 50 | 0.82 | Student-centered C34 | 6 | 2 | 2 | | | 44 | 50 | 0.88 | Good communication between teachers and students in the classroom C41 | 6 | 4 | | | | 46 | 50 | 0.92 | Students master the English knowledge they have learned C42 | 8 | 2 | | | | 48 | 50 | 0.96 | Students’ English ability is improved C43 | 7 | 3 | | | | 47 | 50 | 0.94 | Students’ interest in English learning increases C44 | 10 | | | | | 50 | 50 | 1.0 | Reasonable use of teaching materials C51 | 6 | 2 | 2 | | | 44 | 50 | 0.88 | Strong continuity of teaching process C52 | 9 | 1 | | | | 49 | 50 | 0.98 | Scientific rigorous C53 | 9 | 1 | | | | 49 | 50 | 0.98 |
|
|