[Retracted] Multipoint Distribution Vehicle Routing Optimization Problem considering Random Demand and Changing Load

Table 2

Comparison of energy consumption between CVRP and LVGVRP.

Subpath	CVRP			LVGVRP
	Route		Energy consumption	Route		Energy consumption
r1	0	0.80	115.26	0	0.80	91.87
	21	0.68	15.12	13	0.64	39.43
	31	0.59	8.56	17	0.45	3.24
	19	0.35	3.02	19	0.21	6.52
	17	0.16	27.89	31	0.12	10.08
	13	0.00	51.04	21	0.00	64.03
The energy consumption of r1	—	—	220.88	—	—	215.17
r2	0	0.94	31.58	0	0.94	31.58
	30	0.80	27.48	30	0.80	27.48
	12	0.59	13.11	12	0.59	13.11
	1	0.40	14.88	1	0.40	14.88
	16	0.22	10.91	16	0.22	10.91
	26	0.20	32.31	26	0.20	32.31
	27	0.00	25.96	27	0.00	25.96
The energy consumption of r2	—	—	156.23	—	—	156.23
r3	0	0.90	47.95	0	0.90	47.95
	24	0.66	4.98	24	0.66	4.98
	14	0.63	47.52	14	0.63	47.52
	6	0.51	39.87	6	0.51	39.87
	23	0.43	10.11	23	0.43	10.11
	3	0.37	4.33	3	0.37	4.33
	2	0.16	55.78	2	0.16	55.78
	7	0.00	37.05	7	0.00	37.05
The energy consumption of r3	—	—	247.60	—	—	247.60
R4	0	0.71	106.52	0	0.71	61.96
	29	0.69	33.20	20	0.63	34.85
	15	0.47	25.16	5	0.56	33.60
	10	0.39	22.46	25	0.32	21.33
	25	0.15	24.77	10	0.24	21.23
	5	0.08	23.09	15	0.02	20.04
	20	0.00	36.24	29	0.00	62.29
The energy consumption of r4	—	—	271.43	—	—	255.29
r5	0	0.75	134.48	0	0.75	148.51
	18	0.74	16.42	28	0.60	20.49
	8	0.68	21.38	4	0.41	12.05
	28	0.53	19.59	11	0.27	21.14
	4	0.34	11.45	8	0.21	11.42
	11	0.20	34.99	18	0.20	22.06
	9	0.04	4.41	9	0.04	4.41
	22	0.00	84.17	22	0.00	84.17
The energy consumption of r5	—	—	326.89	—	—	324.25
Total energy consumption	—	—	1223.03	—	—	1198.54