[Retracted] Multipoint Distribution Vehicle Routing Optimization Problem considering Random Demand and Changing Load

Table 3

Comparison of energy consumption between VRPSD and LVGVRPSD.

Subpath	VRPSD			LVGVRPSD
	Route		Energy consumption	Route		Energy consumption
r1	0	0.99	167.94	0	0.99	185.46
	18	0.98	20.58	28	0.89	26.64
	8	0.93	27.09	4	0.74	16.33
	28	0.84	25.91	11	0.65	30.12
	4	0.69	15.84	8	0.60	16.57
	11	0.59	51.09	18	0.59	32.22
	9	0.48	6.90	9	0.48	6.90
	22	0.45	134.05	22	0.45	134.05
The energy consumption of r1	—	—	449.38	—	—	448.28
r2	0	0.99	35.58	0	0.99	35.58
	30	0.89	14.71	30	0.89	14.71
	26	0.88	40.21	26	0.88	40.21
	14	0.85	6.10	14	0.85	6.10
	24	0.68	14.92	24	0.68	14.92
	27	0.56	42.83	27	0.56	42.83
	20	0.50	59.95	20	0.50	59.95
The energy consumption of r2	—	—	214.30	—	—	214.30
r3	0	0.99	136.13	0	0.99	119.26
	29	0.97	42.55	5	0.94	46.07
	15	0.83	34.49	25	0.79	31.73
	10	0.78	31.57	10	0.73	32.56
	25	0.62	38.32	15	0.59	34.42
	5	0.57	94.53	29	0.57	107.90
The energy consumption of r3	—	—	377.58	—	—	371.94
r4	0	0.99	113.39	0	0.99	111.54
	6	0.91	55.58	13	0.87	81.04
	23	0.86	14.46	2	0.72	5.99
	3	0.80	6.26	3	0.66	12.94
	2	0.65	71.78	23	0.61	46.70
	13	0.54	86.19	6	0.54	87.62
The energy consumption of r4	—	—	347.66	—	—	345.83
r5	0	0.99	63.04	0	0.99	56.19
	12	0.83	16.61	16	0.88	20.77
	1	0.71	56.57	12	0.72	15.63
	21	0.62	16.05	1	0.60	53.00
	31	0.56	9.26	21	0.51	14.98
	19	0.40	3.44	31	0.46	8.62
	17	0.29	53.42	19	0.29	3.17
	7	0.19	16.50	17	0.18	48.95
	16	0.08	30.48	7	0.08	43.93
The energy consumption of r5	—	—	265.36	—	—	265.23
Total energy consumption	—	—	1654.28	—	—	1645.57