Research Article
Fed-DNN-Debugger: Automatically Debugging Deep Neural Network Models in Federated Learning
Table 2
Debugging federated models.
| Dataset | Models | Problem type | Origin | FedAvg [1] | Fed-DNN-Debugger | Improvement | MAcc (%) | LAcc (%) | MAcc (%) | LAcc (%) | MAcc (%) | LAcc (%) | MAcc (%) | LAcc (%) |
| MNIST | Model-1 | Overfitting | 91 | 81.31 | 94.53 | 94.12 | 96.1 | 97.95 | 1.57 | 3.83 | Underfitting | 93 | 82.48 | 94.38 | 92.87 | 98.3 | 98.98 | 3.92 | 6.11 | Model-2 | Overfitting | 92.42 | 81.42 | 95.88 | 95.38 | 96.39 | 96.71 | 0.51 | 1.33 | Underfitting | 93.88 | 86.97 | 95.44 | 94.17 | 98.37 | 98.27 | 2.93 | 4.1 | Model-3 | Overfitting | 88.65 | 73.5 | 94.59 | 92.99 | 96.4 | 97.23 | 1.81 | 4.24 | Underfitting | 91.54 | 86.35 | 95.85 | 94.05 | 97.77 | 98.88 | 1.92 | 4.83 | Model-4 | Overfitting | 94.89 | 88.30 | 96.69 | 94.36 | 97.23 | 98.15 | 0.54 | 3.79 | Underfitting | 88.17 | 85.87 | 96.72 | 95.44 | 97.86 | 98.54 | 1.14 | 3.1 |
| CIFAR-10 | Model-1 | Overfitting | 66.51 | 49.7 | 64.81 | 45.4 | 68.61 | 64.48 | 3.8 | 19.08 | Underfitting | 68.07 | 48.8 | 69.58 | 56.4 | 72.75 | 70.4 | 3.17 | 14 | Model-2 | Overfitting | 70.94 | 61 | 71.87 | 62.2 | 72.91 | 71.49 | 1.04 | 9.29 | Underfitting | 72.04 | 50.8 | 68.07 | 67.9 | 76.51 | 76.1 | 8.44 | 8.2 | Model-3 | Overfitting | 80.57 | 68.67 | 82.85 | 82.89 | 84.86 | 84.68 | 2.01 | 1.79 | Underfitting | 75.66 | 65.9 | 75.66 | 75.2 | 82.56 | 79.9 | 6.9 | 4.7 | Model-4 | Overfitting | 77.52 | 66.3 | 78.68 | 73.2 | 80.05 | 76.61 | 1.37 | 3.41 | Underfitting | 84.58 | 74.1 | 85.22 | 78 | 86.95 | 84.7 | 1.73 | 6.7 |
| Average improvement | 2.68 | 5.21 |
|
|