Assessing Partnership Alternatives in an IT Network Employing Analytical Methods

Table 3

The obtained results from the different methods.

Methods	Parameters	Results
		RBV	TCT
Weighting method	< 0.08	2.320	1.760
	0.08 ≤ < 0.2	2.274	1.773
	0.2 ≤ < 0.6	2.261	1.852
	≥ 0.6	1.166	3.258
Global criterion		2.261	1.852
Lexicographic	Preferred obj. = RBV, RBV ≥ 2.3	2.32	1.76
	RBV ≥ 2.2	2.261	1.852
	RBV ≥ 2.1	2.138	1.988
	RBV ≥ 2.0	2.032	2.155
	RBV ≥ 1.9	1.972	2.247
	RBV ≥ 1.8	1.804	2.396
	Preferred obj. = TCT; TCT ≥ 3.2	1.166	3.258
	TCT ≥ 3.0	1.166	3.258
	TCT ≥ 2.8	1.454	2.863
	TCT ≥ 2.6	1.684	2.603
	TCT ≥ 2.4	1.743	2.511
	TCT ≥ 2.2	1.972	2.247
	TCT ≥ 2.0	1.986	2.168
	TCT ≥ 1.8	2.261	1.852
Satisfactory goals	TCT ≥ 1.8; RBV ≥ 2.0	2.261	1.852
SIMOLP	—	2.261	1.852