Stochastic Fractal Search Algorithm for Template Matching with Lateral Inhibition

Table 1

Comparative optimization results obtained using LI-SFS and other algorithms.

Image	Result	LI-IFABC [11]	LI-BEABC [12]	LI-SMS [13]	LI-ICA [7]	LI-SFS
Image 1	Avg	1069.88	1046.40	924.60	881.86	1143.28
	Converged iter	186	199	287	246	137
	Correct rate (%)	66	60	26	20	98
	CPU Time (sec)	1.07	1.04	2.27	2.27	2.24
Image 2	Avg	1859.12	1786.40	1749.80	1570.30	2064.66
	Converged iter	212	247	263	272	90
	Correct rate (%)	52	36	30	10	94
	CPU Time (sec)	1.73	1.72	2.97	3.25	2.88
Image 3	Avg	497.74	500	431.32	459.48	500
	Converged iter	106	94	291	133	67
	Correct rate (%)	96	100	10	60	100
	CPU Time (sec)	0.66	1.32	1.74	1.75	0.61
Image 4	Avg	1712.16	1862.40	1757.58	1570.70	2089.88
	Converged iter	266	231	278	284	90
	Correct rate (%)	26	42	22	6	98
	CPU Time (sec)	1.69	2.88	3.39	2.88	1.58
Image 5	Avg	1847.82	1879.04	1584.42	1690.24	1884
	Converged iter	136	111	283	201	72
	Correct rate (%)	88	98	20	60	100
	CPU Time (sec)	1.66	1.59	3.08	2.73	2.88
Image 6	Avg	1561.54	1561.2	1440.82	1316.42	1610
	Converged iter	183	187	288	285	92
	Correct rate (%)	72	70	12	6	100
	CPU Time (sec)	2.64	1.36	2.69	2.72	1.34
Image 7	Avg	1019.60	1027.60	1021.64	973.74	1051.16
	Converged iter	272	262	284	300	231
	Correct rate (%)	22	24	18	0	44
	CPU Time (sec)	0.98	1.97	2.24	2.28	0.96