Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Scientific Programming
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 9026387, 18 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9026387
Research Article

Collaborative Knowledge Framework for Mediation Information System Engineering

1School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Shangyuancun 3, Xizhimenwai, Haidian, Beijing 100044, China
2Toulouse University, Mines D’Albi, Campus Jarlard, Route de Teillet, 81013 Albi, France
3InteropSys, 23 Bd. Victor Hugo, 31770 Colomiers, France
4Champollion University, Place Verdun, 81012 Albi, France

Correspondence should be addressed to Wenxin Mu; nc.ude.utjb@umxw

Received 3 March 2017; Revised 7 May 2017; Accepted 30 August 2017; Published 23 October 2017

Academic Editor: Kwok-Yan Lam

Copyright © 2017 Wenxin Mu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Chen, G. Doumeingts, and F. Vernadat, “Architectures for enterprise integration and interoperability: past, present and future,” Computers in Industry, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 647–659, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. Nicolle, J. C. Simon, and K. Yetongnon, “Interoperability of information systems,” Database, vol. 1651, p. 1650, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  3. D. S. Milojicic, V. Kalogeraki, R. Lukose et al., “Peer-to-peer computing,” Citeseer, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  4. N. Guarino and P. Giaretta, “Ontologies and knowledge bases—towards a terminological clarification,” in Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases, pp. 25–32, IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  5. G. Wiederhold, “Mediators in the architecture of future information systems,” Computer, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 38–49, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Bézivin, S. Gérard, P. A. Muller, and L. Rioux, MDA Components: Challenges and Opportunities, 2003.
  7. N. Josuttis, SOA in Practice, O'reilly, 2007.
  8. J. Miller and J. Mukerji, “MDA Guide Version 1.0. 1,” Object Management Group, vol. 234, p. 51, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  9. W. Mu, F. Bénaben, and H. Pingaud, “A methodology proposal for collaborative business process elaboration using a model-driven approach,” Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 349–383, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Oppl, “Supporting the Collaborative Construction of a Shared Understanding About Work with a Guided Conceptual Modeling Technique,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 247–283, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. Guerrero-Contreras, J. L. Navarro-Galindo, J. Samos, and J. L. Garrido, “A collaborative semantic annotation system in health: towards a SOA Design for knowledge sharing in ambient intelligence,” Mobile Information Systems, vol. 2017, Article ID 4759572, 10 pages, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. Knoke, M. Missikoff, and K.-D. Thoben, “Collaborative open innovation management in virtual manufacturing enterprises,” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 158–166, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. W. Medema, J. Adamowski, C. Orr, A. Furber, A. Wals, and N. Milot, “Building a foundation for knowledge co-creation in collaborative water governance: Dimensions of stakeholder networks facilitated through bridging organizations,” Water, vol. 9, no. 1, article no. 60, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Milosevic, D. Lukic, A. Antic, B. Lalic, M. Ficko, and G. Simunovic, “e-CAPP: A distributed collaborative system for internet-based process planning,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 42, pp. 210–223, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. Yeboah-Assiamah, K. Muller, and K. A. Domfeh, “Rising to the challenge: a framework for optimising value in collaborative natural resource governance,” Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 67, pp. 20–29, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Q. Long, “A multi-methodological collaborative simulation for inter-organizational supply chain networks,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 96, pp. 84–95, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Y. Xu and B. Raahemi, “A semantic-based service discovery framework for collaborative environments,” International Journal of Simulation Modelling, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 83–96, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Vargas, L. Cuenca, A. Boza, I. Sacala, and M. Moisescu, “Towards the development of the framework for inter sensing enterprise architecture,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 55–72, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. Costa, C. Lima, J. Sarraipa, and R. Jardim-Gonçalves, “Facilitating knowledge sharing and reuse in building and construction domain: an ontology-based approach,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 263–282, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Durugbo, “Collaborative networks: A systematic review and multi-level framework,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 3749–3776, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. Shahriari, A. G. Hessami, A. Jadidi, and N. Lehoux, “An approach toward a conceptual collaborative framework based on a case study in a wood supply chain,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1163–1172, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. N. Boissel-Dallier, F. Benaben, J.-P. Lorré, and H. Pingaud, “Mediation information system engineering based on hybrid service composition mechanism,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 108, pp. 39–59, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. A. Chappell, Enterprise Service Bus, O’Reilly Media, 2004.
  24. A.-M. Barthe-Delanoë, S. Carbonnel, F. Bénaben, and H. Pingaud, “Event-driven agility of crisis management collaborative processes,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM '12), Vancouver, Canada, April 2012. View at Scopus
  25. L. M. Camarinha-Matos and H. Afsarmanesh, “On reference models for collaborative networked organizations,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 2453–2469, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. A. Zachman, “A framework for information systems architecture,” IBM Systems Journal, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 276–292, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. DTIC, Technical Architecture Framework for Information Management. Volumes 1–8. Version 3.0 (Computer Diskette), 1996.
  28. N. Umheh, A. Miller, and C. Dagli, TOGAF vs. DoDAF: Architecting Frameworks for Net-Centric Systems, 2007.
  29. C4ISR, C4ISR Architecture Framework Version 2.0, AWG—US Department of Defence, 1997.
  30. B. Biggs, “Ministry of Defence Architectural Framework (MODAF),” IEE Seminar on UML Systems Engineering, vol. 2005, no. 10814, pp. 43–82, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  31. J. Zachman, The Zachman Framework for Enterprise Architecture, Zachman International, 2002.
  32. D. Chen, B. Vallespir, and G. Doumeingts, “GRAI integrated methodology and its mapping onto generic enterprise reference architecture and methodology,” Computers in Industry, vol. 33, no. 2-3, pp. 387–394, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. G. Doumeingts, B. Vallespir, and D. Chen, “GRAI GridDecisional modelling,” in Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems, pp. 321–346, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  34. T. J. Williams and H. Li, “PERA and GERAM—enterprise reference architectures in enterprise integration,” in Information Infrastructure Systems for Manufacturing II, pp. 3–30, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. A. W. Scheer, ARIS-Business Process Modeling, Springer, 2000.
  36. K. Kosanke, “CIMOSA - Overview and status,” Computers in Industry, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 101–109, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. Vamus and N. Panaich, TOGAF 9 Survey Results Presentation, 2009.
  38. I. I. Force, “GERAM: Generalised Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology,” IFIP-IFAC Task Force Archit. Enterp. Integr. Tech Rep, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  39. C. I. O. Council, Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework (FEAF)—Version 1.1, 1999.
  40. IDEAS, A Gap Analysis—Required Activities in Research, Technology and Standardisation to Close The RTS Gap—Roadmaps And Recommendations on RTS Activites, 2003.
  41. A. Berre et al., “The ATHENA interoperability framework,” in Enterprise Interoperability II, pp. 569–580, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  42. ISO 9000, “ISO 9000 Quality management,” September 2005, http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/publications_and_e-products/publication_item.htm?pid=PUB100224.
  43. ISO 9000 X50-130, “NF EN ISO 9000 X50-130 Systèmes de management de la qualité—Principes essentiels et vocabulaire,” October 2005, http://catdoc.mines-albi.fr:8080/Record.htm?idlist=6&record=19143202124919614849.
  44. V. Rajsiri, J.-P. Lorré, F. Bénaben, and H. Pingaud, “Knowledge-based system for collaborative process specification,” Computers in Industry, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 161–175, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. Touzi, F. Benaben, H. Pingaud, and J. P. Lorré, “A model-driven approach for collaborative service-oriented architecture design,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 5–20, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. F. Benaben and F. B. Vernadat, “Information System agility to support collaborative organisations,” Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 470–473, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. F. Benaben, W. Mu, N. Boissel-Dallier, A.-M. Barthe-Delanoe, S. Zribi, and H. Pingaud, “Supporting interoperability of collaborative networks through engineering of a service-based Mediation Information System (MISE 2.0),” Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 9, pp. 556–582, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. A.-M. Barthe-Delanoë, S. Truptil, F. Bénaben, and H. Pingaud, “Event-driven agility of interoperability during the Run-time of collaborative processes,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 171–179, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. S. Truptil, F. Benaben, H. Pingaud, and C. Hanachi, “Une architecture de système d’information collaboratif pour la gestion de crise,” in Proceedings of the INFORSID09, 2009.
  50. W. Mu, F. Bénaben, and H. Pingaud, “An ontology based collaborative business service selection—contributing to automatic building of collaborative business process,” in Risks and Resilience of Collaborative Networks, L. M. CamarinhaMatos, F. Benaben, and W. Picard, Eds., vol. 463, pp. 639–651, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. W. Mu, Caractérisation et logique d’une situation collaborative, INPT, Toulouse, France, 2012.
  52. S. Lee, T.-Y. Kim, D. Kang, K. Kim, and J. Y. Lee, “Composition of executable business process models by combining business rules and process flows,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 221–229, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. F. Bénaben, N. Boissel-Dallier, J.-P. Lorré, and H. Pingaud, “Semantic reconciliation in interoperability management through model-driven approach,” IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 336, pp. 705–712, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus