Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Scientific Programming
Volume 2017, Article ID 9057947, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9057947
Research Article

Mixed-Integer Linear Programming Models for Teaching Assistant Assignment and Extensions

1School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
2Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
3School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
4Department of Logistics & Maritime Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
5National Research Council of the National Research Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, DC 20001, USA
6Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban ITS, Jiangsu Province Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, School of Transportation, Southeast University, Jiangsu, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Tingsong Wang; nc.ude.uhw@stgnawsme, Shuaian Wang; moc.liamg@naiauhsgnaw, and Zhiyuan Liu; moc.361@uilekael

Received 7 May 2016; Revised 1 November 2016; Accepted 7 December 2016; Published 11 January 2017

Academic Editor: Christoph Kessler

Copyright © 2017 Xiaobo Qu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. H. McClure and C. E. Wells, “Modeling multiple criteria in the faculty assignment problem,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 389–394, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. Y. Partovi and B. Arinze, “A knowledge based approach to the faculty-course assignment problem,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 245–256, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. Hu and J. Lei, “English-medium instruction in Chinese higher education: a case study,” Higher Education, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 551–567, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Oleson and M. T. Hora, “Teaching the way they were taught? Revisiting the sources of teaching knowledge and the role of prior experience in shaping faculty teaching practices,” Higher Education, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 29–45, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Valouxis and E. Housos, “Constraint programming approach for school timetabling,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1555–1572, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. N. Beligiannis, C. Moschopoulos, and S. D. Likothanassis, “A genetic algorithm approach to school timetabling,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 23–42, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  7. N. Pillay and W. Banzhaf, “An informed genetic algorithm for the examination timetabling problem,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 457–467, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. A. Breslaw, “A linear programming solution to the faculty assignment problem,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 227–230, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. M. J. Schniederjans and G. C. Kim, “A goal programming model to optimize departmental preference in course assignments,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 87–96, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. A. Badri, “A two-stage multiobjective scheduling model for [faculty-course-time] assignments,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 16–28, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. W. Qu, Y. Zhao, M. Wang, and B. Liu, “Research on teaching gamification of software engineering,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE '14), Vancouver, Canada, August 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. T. F. Burgess, “Planning the academic's workload: different approaches to allocating work to university academics,” Higher Education, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 63–75, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. I. Vardi, “The impacts of different types of workload allocation models on academic satisfaction and working life,” Higher Education, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 499–508, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. J. Bentley and S. Kyvik, “Academic work from a comparative perspective: a survey of faculty working time across 13 countries,” Higher Education, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 529–547, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Halse, E. Deane, J. Hobson, and G. Jones, “The research—teaching nexus: what do national teaching awards tell us?” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 727–746, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. C. Shin, “Teaching and research nexuses across faculty career stage, ability and affiliated discipline in a South Korean research university,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 485–503, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Hornibrook, “Policy implementation and academic workload planning in the managerial university: understanding unintended consequences,” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. D. J. Kenny and A. E. Fluck, “The effectiveness of academic workload models in an institution: a staff perspective,” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 585–602, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. Li, Z. Gao, K. Li, and D. Z. W. Wang, “Train routing model and algorithm combined with train scheduling,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 81–91, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Z. Liu, S. Wang, W. Chen, and Y. Zheng, “Willingness to board: a novel concept for modeling queuing up passengers,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 90, pp. 70–82, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. D. Z. W. Wang, H. Liu, and W. Y. Szeto, “A novel discrete network design problem formulation and its global optimization solution algorithm,” Transportation Research E, vol. 79, pp. 213–230, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. Liu and D. Z. W. Wang, “Global optimization method for network design problem with stochastic user equilibrium,” Transportation Research B, vol. 72, pp. 20–39, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. B. Du and D. Z. W. Wang, “Continuum modeling of park-and-ride services considering travel time reliability and heterogeneous commuters—a linear complementarity system approach,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 71, pp. 58–81, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus