Research Article

Automatic Testing of Program Slicers

Table 3

Empirical evaluation and comparison of Slicerl and e-Knife.

OriginalSlicerle-Knife
NodesTime (s)Nodes (%)Time (s)Nodes (%)

b1_s56Year8203.21647 (78.90)
b2_s38C1280.8795 (74.22)2.0795 (74.22)
b2_s40D1280.8898 (76.56)2.0898 (76.56)
b3_s28C530.8235 (66.04)2.0835 (66.04)
b4_s32Abb872.1974 (85.06)
b5_s30C540.9951 (94.44)2.0951 (94.44)
b6_s35C1331.0262 (46.62)2.1072 (54.14)
b6_s36D1331.0149 (36.84)2.0949 (36.84)
b7_s27C280.9522 (78.57)2.1622 (78.57)
b8_s29Deposits800.9578 (97.50)2.0876 (95.00)
b9_s59A590.8157 (96.61)2.0654 (91.53)
b10_s34DB1422.78113 (79.58)
b11_s28C400.8332 (80.00)2.0932 (80.00)
b12_s40BS4542.52118 (25.99)
b12_s92A4542.1894 (20.70)
b13_s38NewI660.9446 (69.70)2.1746 (69.70)
b14_s44V2090.9379 (37.80)2.2799 (47.37)
b14_s45W2090.9689 (42.58)2.2864 (30.62)
b14_s46Z2090.86117 (55.98)2.2897 (46.41)
b15_s65Shown2252.39195 (86.67)
b16_s58C1081.6730 (27.78)
b17_s54X791.0176 (96.20)
b18_s50J951.0292 (96.84)
Average173.520.9265 (68.10)2.12101.26 (66.97)
Average total173.520.56146.61 (80.59)2.12101.26 (66.97)