Research Article
CirBiTree: Citrullination Site Inference Based on a Fuzzy Neural Network and Flexible Neural Tree
Table 2
The performances of different methods in length 15.
| Method | Sn (%) | Sp (%) | F1 | MCC |
| DNABIND [34] | 69.27 | 67.93 | 0.6881 | 0.3720 | DNAbinder [34] | 68.37 | 73.68 | 0.7024 | 0.4211 | DBD-Threader [35] | 54.49 | 93.31 | 0.6761 | 0.5187 | DNA-Prot [35] | 64.96 | 79.49 | 0.7005 | 0.4492 | iDNA-Prot [36] | 73.26 | 73.07 | 0.7319 | 0.4633 | DBPPred [37] | 77.01 | 72.28 | 0.7523 | 0.4934 | PLMLA [38] | 65.67 | 69.11 | 0.6682 | 0.3480 | Phosida [39] | 75.55 | 83.34 | 0.7862 | 0.5908 | LysAcet [40] | 74.14 | 73.71 | 0.7398 | 0.4785 | EnsemblePail [41] | 74.87 | 70.17 | 0.7315 | 0.4509 | PSKAcePred [42] | 68.47 | 67.60 | 0.6817 | 0.3607 | BRABSB [43] | 78.41 | 69.87 | 0.7520 | 0.4846 | SSPKA [44] | 74.40 | 78.69 | 0.7603 | 0.5313 | Proposed algorithm | 78.19 | 79.28 | 0.7862 | 0.5747 |
|
|