Research Article
The Model of the Relationship between Urban Rail Transit and Residential Location
Table 2
The static data of the residential area.
| Residential area | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| Completeness of hedonic facilities | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 | The number of families | 7000 | 5000 | 5000 | 7000 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 20000 | 7000 | 7000 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 7000 | Proportion of high-income families (%) | 20% | 20% | 20% | 25% | 15% | 20% | 15% | 20% | 30% | 25% | 20% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 15% | 20% | 15% | 15% | 20% | The distribution of main destinations for the family | 9 | 560 | 400 | 1000 | 2100 | 1000 | 500 | 400 | 1500 | 5000 | 1400 | 700 | 500 | 750 | 1000 | 1000 | 500 | 250 | 250 | 350 | 1 | 2100 | 1750 | 500 | 350 | 250 | 250 | 1500 | 250 | 1000 | 350 | 350 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 140 | 19 | 210 | 150 | 250 | 350 | 250 | 250 | 100 | 100 | 1000 | 350 | 700 | 500 | 250 | 500 | 250 | 500 | 1000 | 1500 | 2800 | 6 | 210 | 150 | 250 | 350 | 500 | 1000 | 150 | 100 | 1000 | 700 | 1400 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 250 | 500 | 500 | 250 | 350 | 9,1 | 2100 | 1500 | 1500 | 1050 | 250 | 250 | 1750 | 1250 | 3000 | 350 | 350 | 250 | 1500 | 500 | 250 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 70 | 9,19 | 140 | 100 | 250 | 350 | 250 | 250 | 100 | 500 | 3000 | 1050 | 700 | 500 | 500 | 1000 | 1250 | 1250 | 1000 | 1000 | 1400 | 9,6 | 140 | 100 | 250 | 1050 | 1500 | 1500 | 150 | 500 | 3000 | 1400 | 1400 | 1000 | 250 | 250 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 700 | 1,19 | 700 | 400 | 350 | 350 | 250 | 250 | 400 | 350 | 1000 | 350 | 350 | 250 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 350 | 1,6 | 700 | 350 | 500 | 700 | 500 | 500 | 350 | 350 | 1000 | 350 | 350 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 140 | 19,6 | 140 | 100 | 150 | 350 | 250 | 250 | 100 | 100 | 1000 | 700 | 700 | 1000 | 250 | 250 | 500 | 1000 | 1000 | 750 | 700 |
|
|