Research Article
AGV Scheduling Optimization for Medical Waste Sorting System
Table 2
Algorithm performance for large-scale instances.
| Instances | VNS | Heuristic | Comparison | Scale | ID | | | | | | (%) | (%) |
| | 1 | 74.0 | 0.006 | 21 | 74.0 | 0.008 | 5.00 | 0.00 | 2 | 86.0 | 0.008 | 36 | 86.0 | 0.007 | 80.00 | 0.00 | 3 | 81.0 | 0.005 | 37 | 81.0 | 0.003 | 85.00 | 0.00 | 4 | 78.0 | 0.006 | 36 | 78.0 | 0.003 | 80.00 | 0.00 | 5 | 73.0 | 0.008 | 21 | 73.0 | 0.006 | 5.00 | 0.00 | Avg. | | 78.4 | 0.007 | 30 | 78.4 | 0.005 | 51.00 | 0.00 |
| | 1 | 125.0 | 0.014 | 24 | 125.0 | 0.005 | 20.00 | 0.00 | 2 | 127.0 | 0.015 | 23 | 126.0 | 0.003 | 15.00 | −0.79 | 3 | 126.0 | 0.010 | 24 | 126.0 | 0.007 | 20.00 | 0.00 | 4 | 132.0 | 0.012 | 27 | 131.0 | 0.007 | 35.00 | −0.76 | 5 | 130.0 | 0.024 | 27 | 128.0 | 0.004 | 35.00 | −1.54 | Avg. | | 128.0 | 0.015 | 25 | 127.2 | 0.005 | 25.00 | −0.62 |
| | 1 | 228.0 | 0.026 | 26 | 228.0 | 0.003 | 23.81 | 0.00 | 2 | 224.0 | 0.025 | 27 | 224.0 | 0.003 | 28.57 | 0.00 | 3 | 232.0 | 0.026 | 29 | 232.0 | 0.008 | 38.10 | 0.00 | 4 | 227.0 | 0.026 | 26 | 227.0 | 0.011 | 23.81 | 0.00 | 5 | 226.0 | 0.030 | 27 | 226.0 | 0.003 | 28.57 | 0.00 | Avg. | | 227.4 | 0.027 | 27 | 227.4 | 0.006 | 28.57 | 0.00 |
| | 1 | 527.0 | 0.098 | 29 | 527.0 | 0.011 | 31.82 | 0.00 | 2 | 529.0 | 0.096 | 29 | 529.0 | 0.003 | 31.82 | 0.00 | 3 | 525.0 | 0.094 | 29 | 525.0 | 0.004 | 31.82 | 0.00 | 4 | 531.0 | 0.092 | 31 | 531.0 | 0.003 | 40.91 | 0.00 | 5 | 530.0 | 0.097 | 32 | 529.0 | 0.003 | 45.45 | −0.19 | Avg. | | 528.4 | 0.095 | 30 | 528.2 | 0.005 | 36.36 | −0.04 |
|
|