Research Article

Logistics Distribution Location Algorithm Based on Improved Imperial Competition Algorithm

Table 3

Comparison of IICA, ICA, and HS-SA results under different scale examples.

ExamplesAlgorithmBest valueMaximum difference valueAverage valueAverage deviation rate (%)Average CPU running time (s)

I1IICA473292.10495635.29485116.742.50208.01
ICA508532.165552807.32542479.126.68210.27
HS-SA476899.28540145.96509045.716.74238.20

I2IICA481755.47505259.35491528.372.03202.98
ICA508364.11536836.58528604.793.98207.08
HS-SA514238.19557061.58532107.683.47232.94

I3IICA297755.56322837.48306812.793.04132.90
ICA338145.28386614.43369751.389.35141.73
HS-SA322288.01368362.18341486.695.96167.97

I4IICA250995.19265680.99258108.182.83135.25
ICA258353.54306575.04281304.558.88143.92
HS-SA254393.24324192.23273091.027.35163.14

I5IICA130179.00137153.13134007.022.94101.50
ICA144109.44157950.78153328.736.40105.46
HS-SA136060.07151761.65142757.374.92112.80

I6IICA175181.59197875.06180529.973.05103.24
ICA191526.10239578.56220382.7815.07107.91
HS-SA180761.54219009.74198518.349.82120.59