Research Article
Automatic Retinal Vessel Segmentation Based on an Improved U-Net Approach
Table 7
Performance analysis of different modified U-Nets on DRIVE and STARE databases with respect to the measuring metrics.
| Method | DRIVE | STARE | ACC | TPR | TNR | ACC | TPR | TNR |
| MSFFU-Net [32] | 0.9694 | 0.7762 | 0.9835 | 0.9537 | 0.7721 | 0.9885 | Dense U-net [34] | 0.9511 | 0.7986 | 0.9736 | 0.9538 | 0.7914 | 0.9722 | AA-UNet [53] | 0.9558 | 0.7941 | 0.9798 | 0.9640 | 0.7598 | 0.9878 | DUNet [54] | 0.9566 | 0.7963 | 0.9800 | 0.9641 | 0.7595 | 0.9878 | EEA U-net [55] | 0.9577 | 0.7918 | 0.9708 | 0.9445 | 0.8021 | 0.9561 | Our algorithm | 0.9701 | 0.8011 | 0.9849 | 0.9683 | 0.6032 | 0.9967 |
|
|