Research Article
Cervical Cancer Diagnosis Model Using Extreme Gradient Boosting and Bioinspired Firefly Optimization
Table 11
Comparison of the proposed study with benchmark studies.
| Target class | Model | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPA | NPA |
| Hinselmann (15) | Abdoh et al. [5] | 93.97 | 100 | 89.96 | 84.97 | 100 | Wu and Zhou [4] | 97.6 | 96.65 | 98.54 | 98.48 | 96.78 | Proposed study | 98.38 | 97.55 | 99.2 | 99.17 | 97.63 |
| Schiller (13) | Abdoh et al. [5] | 90.18 | 98.73 | 84.63 | 80.75 | 99.03 | Wu and Zhou [4] | 95.01 | 93.24 | 97.58 (12) | 97.29 (12) | 93.81 | Proposed study | 96.39 | 95.9 | 96.92 | 97.1 | 95.65 |
| Cytology (11) | Abdoh et al. [5] | 92.75 | 100 | 87.92 | 83 | 100 | Wu and Zhou [4] | 96.94 | 95.58 (8) | 99.01 | 98.94 | 95.76 (8) | Proposed study | 96.98 | 95.83 | 99.74 | 98.73 | 95.93 |
| Biopsy (11) | Abdoh et al. [5] | 94.13 | 100 | 90.21 | 86.07 | 100 | Wu and Zhou [4] | 96.06 | 94.94 (6) | 97.76 (11) | 97.58 (11) | 94.91 | Proposed study | 96.93 | 95.26 | 98.73 | 98.77 | 95.1 |
|
|