| | Year | Subgroup | Province | Pattern |
| | 2010 | First subgroup | Tibet and Qinghai | Leading mode of low input and low output | | | Second subgroup | Heilongjiang, Guizhou, Inner Mongolia, and Shaanxi | CIC’s weak equilibrium model | | | Third subgroup | Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Shandong, Fujian, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu | Higher-level equilibrium model | | | Fourth subgroup | Hebei, Shanxi, Jilin, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Liaoning, Hubei, Hunan, Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan, Chongqing, Sichuan, Yunnan, Gansu, Ningxia, and Xinjiang | Low-level equilibrium model | | 2011 | First subgroup | Xinjiang, Gansu, and Ningxia | Low-level equilibrium model | | | Second subgroup | Hebei, Yunnan, Heilongjiang, Jiangxi, Sichuan, Guizhou, Tibet, Inner Mongolia, Jilin, Anhui, and Henan | CIC’s weak equilibrium model | | | Third subgroup | Beijing, Shanghai, Zhejiang, and Guangdong | Higher-level equilibrium model | | | Fourth subgroup | Shanxi, Fujian, Shandong, Hubei, Hunan, Hainan, Shaanxi, Qinghai, Tianjin, Liaoning, Guangxi, Chongqing, and Jiangsu | Medium-level equilibrium model | | 2012 | First subgroup | Sichuan, Yunnan, Tibet, Ningxia, Xinjiang, and Qinghai | High input and high diffusion mode | | | Second subgroup | Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, Heilongjiang, Jiangsu, Shandong, Henan, Guizhou, Anhui, Hunan, Guangxi, and Chongqing | Medium-level equilibrium model | | | Third subgroup | Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Zhejiang, Fujian, Guangdong, Jiangxi, and Shaanxi | High-level equilibrium model | | | Fourth subgroup | Hebei, Liaoning, Jilin, Hubei, Hainan, and Gansu | CIC’s weak equilibrium model | | 2013 | First subgroup | Hubei, Hainan, Chongqing, Sichuan, Tibet, Shaanxi, Qinghai, Ningxia, and Xinjiang | Leading mode of high investment and high diffusion | | | Second subgroup | Hebei, Liaoning, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Guangdong, and Gansu | Low-level equilibrium model | | | Third subgroup | Beijing, Jilin, Heilongjiang, Shanghai, Zhejiang, and Fujian | Higher-level equilibrium model | | | Fourth subgroup | Tianjin, Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, Jiangsu, Shandong, Hunan, Guizhou, Guangxi, and Yunnan | Medium-level equilibrium model | | 2014 | First subgroup | Hebei, Jiangsu, Anhui, Shandong, Guangxi, Sichuan, Yunnan, Tibet, Gansu, and Xinjiang | Medium-level equilibrium model | | | Second subgroup | Shanxi, Liaoning, Jilin, Hubei, Hainan, Guizhou, Shaanxi, and Qinghai | Medium base weak equilibrium model | | | Third subgroup | Beijing, Tianjin, Inner Mongolia, Shanghai, Hunan, Guangdong, and Chongqing | High-efficiency output leading mode | | | Fourth subgroup | Heilongjiang, Zhejiang, Fujian, Jiangxi, Henan, and Ningxia | Equilibrium model in weak input | | 2015 | First subgroup | Shanxi, Liaoning, Shanghai, Henan, Hunan, Guangxi, Xinjiang, Tibet, Gansu, and Ningxia | Medium-level equilibrium model | | | Second subgroup | Jilin, Heilongjiang, Zhejiang, Anhui, Guizhou, Shaanxi, and Qinghai | CIC's weak equilibrium model | | | Third subgroup | Beijing, Hebei, Jiangsu, Jiangxi, Shandong, Guangdong, and Chongqing | Higher-level equilibrium model | | | Fourth subgroup | Tianjin, Inner Mongolia, Fujian, Hubei, Hainan, Sichuan, and Yunnan | Medium base weak equilibrium model | | 2016 | First subgroup | Hebei, Jiangsu, Shandong, Guangxi, Yunnan, Tibet, and Xinjiang | Equilibrium model in weak input | | | Second subgroup | Heilongjiang, Zhejiang, Fujian, Shaanxi, Qinghai, and Ningxia | Medium-level equilibrium model | | | Third subgroup | Beijing, Tianjin, Inner Mongolia, Shanghai, Anhui, Hunan, Guangdong, Chongqing, and Gansu | High-efficiency output leading mode | | | Fourth subgroup | Shanxi, Liaoning, Jilin, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei, Hainan, Sichuan, and Guizhou | Medium base weak equilibrium model | | 2017 | First subgroup | Heilongjiang, Fujian, Henan, Hubei, Hainan, and Guizhou | Equilibrium model in weak input | | | Second subgroup | Zhejiang, Hunan, Chongqing, and Ningxia | Medium investment and high diffusion dominated model | | | Third subgroup | Hebei, Jilin, Anhui, Shandong, Yunnan, and Xinjiang | Medium-level equilibrium model | | | Fourth subgroup | Beijing, Tianjin, Inner Mongolia, Jiangsu, Jiangxi, Guangdong, Guangxi, Sichuan, Tibet, and Gansu | High-efficiency output leading mode | | | Fifth subgroup | Shanxi, Liaoning, Shanghai, Shaanxi, and Qinghai | Leading mode of high foundation and high yield | | 2018 | First subgroup | Tianjin, Inner Mongolia, Jiangxi, Hunan, Sichuan, Tibet, and Gansu | Equilibrium model in weak input | | | Second subgroup | Hebei, Shanxi, Ningxia, Shandong, Guizhou, Yunnan, Shaanxi, Qinghai, and Xinjiang | Medium base weak equilibrium model | | | Third subgroup | Jiangsu, Anhui, Hainan, and Chongqing | Leading mode of high foundation and high yield | | | Fourth subgroup | Heilongjiang, Henan, Hubei, and Guangxi | Medium-level equilibrium model | | | Fifth subgroup | Beijing, Liaoning, Jilin, Shanghai, Fujian, Zhejiang, and Guangdong | Higher-level equilibrium model | | 2019 | First subgroup | Beijing, Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jilin, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Fujian, and Shandong | Higher-level equilibrium model | | | Second subgroup | Tianjin, Inner Mongolia, Anhui, Jiangxi, Hebei, Guangxi, Sichuan, Tibet, and Gansu | Equilibrium model in weak input | | | Third subgroup | Shanxi, Liaoning, Hunan, Chongqing, Shaanxi, Qinghai, Guizhou, and Yunnan | Medium-level equilibrium model | | | Fourth subgroup | Heilongjiang, Henan, Hubei, Hainan, Ningxia, and Xinjiang | Medium investment and high diffusion leading model |
|
|
