Review Article
A Comparative Study among Handwritten Signature Verification Methods Using Machine Learning Techniques
Table 2
Offline datasets comparison.
| Dataset name | Language | No. of signers | Genuine | Forge | Total |
| CEDAR [37] | Belongs to versatile cultural backgrounds. | 55 | 24 | 24 | 2640 | MCYT-75 [37] | Spanish | 75 | 15 | 15 | 2250 | GPDS-syntheses [38] | Computer-generated dataset | | 24 | 30 | 4000 | SigComp’11 | Dutch | 64 | | | 1932 | SigComp’11 | Chinese | 20 | | | 1177 | SigWiComp’13 | Japanese | 30 | 42 | 36 | 2340 |
|
|