Research Article
A Critique on Task Allocation Processes in Distributed Agile Software Development
Table 1
Evaluation based on proposed task allocation process.
| Development setup | Proposed methodology | High-level process activities | Low-level process activities | DO | TI | DC | CI | DR | RI | FI | DI | TR | CF | CD | RD | C/R | PF | IF | SF | TF | AF | EF | TmF | TecF | BD | SD | WD | AD | TD | DSD-D |
| SD | Estimation model [79] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | — | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | SD | Mathematical model for scheduling [85] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | SD | Scheduling approach [4] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | SD | Systematic literature review [81] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | SD | Framework [82] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | — | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | SD | AITA with negotiation tree [116] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | — | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | SD | Multi-objective optimization approach [78] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | — | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | SD | Approach for mining task dependencies [95] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | SD | Model for job design [84] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | — | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | DSD | Models and algorithms [24] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | — | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | DSD | Verbal decision analysis method [18] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | — | — | — | — | ✗ | — | — | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | DSD | Planning tool [36] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | — | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | DSD | Decision support model [13] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | — | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | DSD | Task assignment method [22] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | DSD | Task allocation algorithm [23] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | — | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | DSD | Framework for allocation [20] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | — | — | — | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | DSD | Hybrid methodology [19] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | DSD | Multicriteria model [16] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | — | — | — | — | ✗ | — | — | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ASD | Decision support system [55] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | ✗ | — | ✓ | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ASD | Multi-agent simulation[58] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | — | — | ✗ | — | ✓ | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ASD | Algorithms [37] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | ✗ | — | ✓ | — | ✗ | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ASD | Software tool for agile management [57] | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | — | — | ✗ | — | ✓ | — | — | — | ✗ | ✗ | | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | DASD | Case study [65] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | — | — | ✓ | — | — | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | — | — | — | ✓ | ✓ | DASD | Taxonomy [76] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | DASD | Decision model [1] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | — | — | ✓ | — | — | — | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | — | ✓ | ✓ | DASD | Hybrid methodology [8] | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ✗ | ✗ | | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | DASD | Framework for task allocation [6] | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
|
|