Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Surgery Research and Practice
Volume 2016, Article ID 4787648, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4787648
Research Article

Difficulties and Problematic Steps in Teaching the Onstep Technique for Inguinal Hernia Repair, Results from a Focus Group Interview

Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730 Herlev, Denmark

Received 16 December 2015; Accepted 21 March 2016

Academic Editor: Pramateftakis Manousos-Georgios

Copyright © 2016 Kristoffer Andresen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. J. Walter, “Surgical education for the twenty-first century: beyond the apprentice model,” Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 233–236, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Lourenço and R. S. da Costa, “The ONSTEP inguinal hernia repair technique: initial clinical experience of 693 patients, in two institutions,” Hernia, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 357–364, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. Andresen, J. Burcharth, and J. Rosenberg, “The initial experience of introducing the Onstep technique for inguinal hernia repair in a general surgical department,” Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 61–65, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Rosenberg, K. Andresen, and J. Laursen, “Team training (training at own facility) versus individual surgeon’s training (training at trainer’s facility) when implementing a new surgical technique: example from the ONSTEP inguinal hernia repair,” Surgery Research and Practice, vol. 2014, Article ID 762761, 5 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. F. Rabiee, “Focus-group interview and data analysis,” Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 655–660, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. W. Turner III, “Qualitative interview design: a practical guide for novice investigators,” Qualitative Report, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 754–760, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Morrison-Beedy, D. Côté-Arsenault, and N. F. Feinstein, “Maximizing results with focus groups: moderator and analysis issues,” Applied Nursing Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 48–53, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H.-F. Hsieh and S. E. Shannon, “Three approaches to qualitative content analysis,” Qualitative Health Research, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1277–1288, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. A. LePine, M. A. LePine, and C. L. Jackson, “Challenge and hindrance stress: relationships with exhaustion, motivation to learn, and learning performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 883–891, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. E. Fenner, “Avoiding pitfalls: lessons in surgical teaching,” Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 333–342, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. S. Hampton, D. Magrane, and V. Sung, “Perceptions of operating room learning experiences during the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship,” Journal of Surgical Education, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 377–381, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. Lyon, “A model of teaching learning in the operating theatre,” Medical Education, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 1278–1287, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. S. Garner, R. J. Gusberg, and A. W. Kim, “The positive effect of immediate feedback on medical student education during the surgical clerkship,” Journal of Surgical Education, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 391–397, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus