Clinical Study
Efficacy and Outcomes of Intrathecal Analgesia as Part of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway in Colon and Rectal Surgical Patients
Table 2
Comparison of various intrathecal regimens.
| | IA-O () | IA-L () | value |
| Surgical approach, (%) | | | 0.15 | Open | 329 (60) | 27 (50) | — | MIS | 218 (40) | 27 (50) | — | Incidence of ileus, (%) | 86 (16) | 9 (17) | 0.86 | Length of stay (days), median (IQR) | 3 (2–5) | 3.5 (3–5) | 0.29 | Pain score, median (IQR) | | | | 4 hours | 3 (1–5) | 3 (2–5) | 0.52 | 8 hours | 2 (1–4) | 2.5 (2–4) | 0.16 | 16 hours | 3 (1–5) | 4 (2–7) | 0.10 | 24 hours | 3 (2–5) | 4 (2–6) | 0.32 | 48 hours | 3 (2–5) | 4 (2–5) | 0.12 | 48-hour maximum | 6 (4–7) | 7 (5–8) | 0.045 | Total OME received, median (IQR) | 22.5 (0–82.5) | 33.8 (15–98) | 0.06 | Number of patients receiving no OME, (%) | 162 (30) | 8 (15) | 0.03 |
|
|
IA: intrathecal opioid; IA-L: intrathecal opioid + local anesthetic; MIS: minimally invasive surgery; IQR: interquartile range.
|