Review Article

A Systematic Review of Early versus Late Closure of Loop Ileostomy

Table 1

Comparison between patient baseline demographics.

ReferenceNumber of patientsGender (F : M)Age (years)ASAMain diagnosisIndex operationAdjuvant radio-chemotherapy
IIIIIIIV
ECLCECLCECLCECLCECLCECLCECLCECLCECLCECLC

Danielsen et al.555756 : 4437 : 63676722%33%38%23%33%35%5%2%Rectal cancerTME29%28%
Figueiredo et al.65a155b7945 : 55a50 : 50b34 : 6660a62b6228%a29%b20%63%a63%b67%9%a8%b13%abRectal cancerTME75%a58%b59%
Wanglin et al.17917988 : 9188 : 9145.745.656.4%c56.4%c56.4%c56.4%c44%d44%d44%d44%dCancer (20.1%) IBD (69.8%) others (10.1%)AC/LI (36.3%) CP/IPAA (31.3%) LAR/DLI (10.1%) TP/IPAA (6.7%) others (15.6%)AC/LI (27.9%) CP/IPAA (30.7%) LAR/DLI (11.7%) TP/IPAA (6.7%) others (22.9%)17%17%
Park et al.555731 : 2421 : 366767n/rn/rn/rn/rn/rn/rn/rn/rRectal cancerTME69%68%

aClosure before 60 days of stoma creation. bClosure 61–90 days after stoma creation. cPercentage of ASA I and II grouped together. dPercentage of ASA III and IV grouped together. n/r: not reported; EC: early closure; LC: late closure; TME: total mesorectal excision; CP/IPAA: complete proctectomy with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis; LAR/DLI: low anterior resection/diverting loop ileostomy; TP/IPAA: total proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis; IBD: inflammatory bowel disease.