Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Stroke Research and Treatment
Volume 2010, Article ID 602642, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2010/602642
Case Report

Inraoperative and Histological Visualization of Disrupted Vulnerable Plaques following Diagnostic Angiography of Moderate Carotid Stenosis

Department of Stroke Science, Research Institute for Brain and Blood Vessels-Akita, Akita 010-0874, Japan
2Department of Surgical Neurology, Research Institute for Brain and Blood Vessels-Akita, Akita 010-0874, Japan

Received 18 August 2009; Accepted 29 October 2009

Academic Editor: Turgut Tatlisumak

Copyright © 2010 Tatsushi Mutoh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) remains an important tool for diagnosis of carotid stenosis but is associated with risk for periprocedural complications. This is the first report of direct intraoperative and histolopathologic visualization of DSA-related carotid plaque disruption. Case. A 64-year-old man diagnosed to have a 60% right carotid stenosis received diagnostic DSA for therapeutic decision-making. He developed transient left hand numbness and weakness immediately after the procedure. Intraoperative imaging during carotid endarterectomy revealed a fragile plaque with sharp surface laceration and intraplaque hemorrhage at the bifurcation. Microscopy of the specimen demonstrated a large atheromatous plaque with fibrous hypertrophy and intraplaque hemorrhage filled with recent hemorrhagic debris. Conclusion. The visualized carotid lesion was more serious than expected, warning the danger of embolization or occlusion associated with the catheter maneuvers. Thus the highest level of practitioner training and technical expertise that ensures precise assessment of plaque characteristics should be encouraged.

1. Introduction

Despite recent advances in minimally invasive imaging techniques for carotid vessels like Doppler ultrasonography (US), MR angiography (MRA), and CT angiography (CTA), digital subtraction angiography (DSA) provides the highest spatial resolution and still remains the “gold standard’’ for diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis, but it is associated with risk for procedure-related neurologic complications. In fact, therapeutic decisions in large clinical trials [14] have been based on maximal internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis depicted with conventional DSA.

It is well known that vulnerable carotid plaque is an atheromatous plaque that is particularly prone to disruption, fracture, or fissuring with a higher risk for embolization, occlusion, and consequent ischemic neurological events [5]. Although disruption of such unstable plaques has been commonly implicated as a risk for procedure-related neurological complications in patients undergoing DSA, most resultant stroke events are clinically silent or transient [6, 7], and there are few descriptions of the affected vessel walls.

We report a case of direct visualization and histolopathologic examination of carotid plaque disruption associated with the diagnostic DSA for therapeutic consideration of asymptomatic moderate-grade carotid stenosis, which was incidentally detected later during carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

2. Case Report

A 64-year-old man with past medical history of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and symptomatic ischemic stroke in the territory of the thalamoperforate artery diagnosed to have an asymptomatic moderate (approximately 50%) right ICA stenosis that was observed on MRA was referred to our center for consideration of surgical intervention. Carotid Doppler ultrasonography demonstrated hypoechoic plaques with an irregular surface at the carotid bifurcation extending to the proximal ICA with stenosis of 83% (by area method) and peak systolic flow velocity at 1.89 m/s (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). Resting single photon emission CT (SPECT) showed severe hypoperfusion in the right ICA territory (Figure 1(c)), presumably due to less prevalence of collateral flow via the anterior or posterior communicating artery (Figures 1(d) and 1(e)) [8].

fig1
Figure 1: (a) B-mode ultrasound with color flow Doppler image on the longitudinal display of the carotid plaque with irregular surface. (b) The transverse display of the plaque at the carotid bifurcation. (c) 1 2 3 I -IMP SPECT transaxial slices of a patient with right ICA stenosis. MR angiography ((d) submental vertical projection; (e) lateral projection) with a hypoplastic or absent anterior and posterior communicating arteries.

For therapeutic decision-making, diagnostic carotid angiography was then performed via a femoral approach. It was difficult to cannulate a 5-Fr. JB-2 catheter (Cook, Bloomington, IN) over an angled 0.035 inch Radifocus guidewire (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) selectively advanced into the right common carotid artery (CCA). The procedure was repeated with a 5-Fr. Simmons II catheter (Cook, Bloomington, IN) but failed to engage in the CCA due to severe vascular elongation. Therefore, the guidewire was advanced carefully, with special attention not to cross the stenotic lesion at the proximal ICA, into the lingual branch of the external carotid artery (ECA) for support, and the catheter was successfully advanced to the CCA. The DSA revealed a 60% stenosis of the proximal right ICA with wall irregularities (Figure 2(a)), calculated according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) method [2]. The contralateral carotid angiogram demonstrated a mild stenosis in the posterior wall of the ICA. Vertebral angiography was discontinued as it was difficult to probe the bilateral vessels due to elongation.

fig2
Figure 2: (a) Peroperative common carotid angiogram (lateral projection) of a 64-year-old asymptomatic patient with a 60% stenosis of the right ICA by NASCET criteria (arrow). (b) Postoperative MR angiography confirmed disappearance of the stenosis. (c) Axial diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain immediately after the occurrence of neurologic events following the DSA. Ipsilateral hyperintense lesions are appreciable at the cortical-subcortical junction of right front-parietal lobes. (d) Postoperative diffusion-weighted imaging indicative of no ischemic lesions associated with CEA. Postoperative MR imagings ((b) and (d)) were performed on the next day after CEA.

The patient developed numbness and mild weakness of the left hand immediately after the procedure. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging showed multiple, small hyperintense lesions in the distal ICA territory of the right front-parietal lobe indicative of an embolic origin from the carotid plaques (Figure 2(c)). The symptoms were transient and resolved within 24 hours of the procedure with supplemental intravenous fluids followed by oral clopidogrel (Plavix, Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY) 75 mg once daily. Based on the results of the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) [1] and the Medical Council Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) [4], the patient is considered to be a good candidate for elective surgery and given informed consent about CEA.

Two weeks later, the patient underwent successful right CEA. Fragile atherosclerotic plaque with sharp surface laceration, somewhat different from atheromatous plaque rupture, accompanied by intraplaque hemorrhage was observed at the proximal ICA close to the bifurcation (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). There was no evidence of perforation outside the wall. Microscopic examination of the endarterectomy specimen revealed a large atheromatous plaque with fibrous hypertrophy and intraplaque hemorrhage filled with recent hemorrhagic debris that stained red to brown with Elastica-Masson stain, cholesterol crystal formation, and speckled calcification (Figure 3(c)). The postoperative course was uneventful and the stenosis had improved significantly on follow-up MRA (Figure 2(b)) with no apparent distal embolization (Figure  2(d)). The patient was asymptomatic at his neurological baseline without any postoperative complications and was discharged on postoperative day 10.

fig3
Figure 3: (a) An intraoperative view of an atheromatous plaque originating from the proximal ICA during CEA with a shunt. (b) Magnified image revealing the sharp laceration of the plaque surface (black arrow) and intraplaque hemorrhage (white arrow). (c) Elastica-Masson stain matching histology cross section of the carotid plaque showing a large lateralized atheroma and intraplaque hemorrhage. A ditch shown in blue arrow suggests a part of the lacerating injury. Asterisks indicate the lumen.

3. Discussion

Although minimally invasive MRA and CTA have partially replaced conventional DSA in clinical routine, it is still not a standardized method for detection and grading of carotid artery stenosis, especially for asymptomatic patients with moderate carotid stenosis (50%–69%) where the quantification of stenosis can seriously impact on clinical decision-making.

According to the current United States guidelines from the American Academy of Neurology, surgical treatment of asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis 60%–99% in patients with a 5-year life expectancy are recommended if the operator has a perioperative complication rate of < 3% (level A) [9]. By contrast, there is no treatment recommendation for asymptomatic patients with stenosis 50%–59%. This patient has already diagnosed as 50% moderate stenosis on MRA, and thus confirmatory imaging was required for therapeutic decision-making. Although multidetector CT had initially been taken into consideration for assessment of carotid stenosis; however, conventional DSA was chosen after all because we were worried about misclassification of patients within the surgical range associated with greater underestimation with CTA in moderate grades of stenosis [10].

It should be noted that the high diagnostic accuracy of DSA before deciding on carotid intervention must be balanced against the risk of neurological complications. The neurologic complications are more common when indication for DSA is carotid stenosis or ischemic stroke (1.8%) [11]. Furthermore, it has also been pointed out that such clinically overt neurological symptoms are only the “tip of the iceberg’’ since the rates of DSA-related silent microemboli detected by diffusion-weighted MR abnormalities are considerably higher [7, 12, 13]. Although it remains a matter of debate, the level of operator experience (procedural and fluoroscopy time, multiple catheters use, and aortography) and the nature of the underlying disease are thought to be predictors of the occurrence of cerebral ischemic events following diagnostic DSA [7, 11]. At the authors’ institution, diagnostic cerebral angiographies are generally performed by neurosurgical fellows who had already performed at least 250 cerebral angiographies and allowed to perform the procedures on their own, with an acceptable neurologic complication rate (0.8%) compatible to those of recent data [7, 11, 14].

We postulate that the periprocedural manipulation could have resulted in the symptomatic neurological event. This might be related to the difficulties in probing the vessels, the presence of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque located at the carotid bifurcation that might be impinged and scraped off the vessel wall presumably during the guidewire maneuver in the ECA, and the instability of fresh thrombus in exulcerating plaques that might embolize during the procedure. Unfortunately, the surface morphology of the excised carotid plaque corresponding to the affected intimal lesion could not be well characterized in this case because of artifacts introduced during the removal of the lesion, and nor could we distinguish the hemorrhagic lesion caused directly by the angiographical procedure and/or by its natural course of bleeding. During CEA, the full thickness of the plaque was incised, thereby disrupting the luminal surface of the lesion. However, the disrupted plaque showed sharp laceration (Figure 2(b)) that cannot be explained simply by atheromatous plaque rupture.

4. Conclusion

This is, to the authors’ knowledge, the first report of direct visualization and histolopathologic examination of DSA-related carotid plaque disruption. The impact of the invasive diagnostic carotid angiography on vessel wall injuries warns the danger of serious procedure-related complications, and thus the highest level of practitioner training and technical expertise that ensures precise preprocedural assessment of plaque characteristics by multimodal methods (e.g., ulcerations, surface irregularities, number of plaques, echolucent plaques, plaque distribution along the carotid bifurcation, intraplaque hemorrhage, and lipid-rich necrotic core) [5, 15, 16] should be encouraged in the patient subgroup where the DSA remains necessary.

References

  1. J. F. Toole, “Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: Executive Committee for Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 273, no. 18, pp. 1421–1428, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. H. J. M. Barnett, D. W. Taylor, M. Eliasziw et al., “Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 339, no. 20, pp. 1415–1425, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. C. Warlow, B. Farrell, A. Fraser, P. Sandercock, and J. Slattery, “Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST),” The Lancet, vol. 351, no. 9113, pp. 1379–1387, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. P. M. Rothwell and L. B. Goldstein, “Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: asymptomatic carotid surgery trial,” Stroke, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 2425–2427, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  5. N. Nighoghossian, L. Derex, and P. Douek, “The vulnerable carotid artery plaque: current imaging methods and new perspectives,” Stroke, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 2764–2772, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  6. M. Cosottini, M. C. Michelassi, M. Puglioli et al., “Silent cerebral ischemia detected with diffusion-weighted imaging in patients treated with protected and unprotected carotid artery stenting,” Stroke, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 2389–2393, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  7. T. Krings, K. Willmes, R. Becker et al., “Silent microemboli related to diagnostic cerebral angiography: a matter of operator's experience and patient's disease,” Neuroradiology, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 387–393, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  8. J. Hendrikse, B. C. Eikelboom, and J. van der Grond, “Magnetic resonance angiography of collateral compensation in asymptomatic and symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 799–805, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. S. Chaturvedi, A. Bruno, T. Feasby et al., “Carotid endarterectomy—an evidence-based review: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology,” Neurology, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 794–801, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  10. H. Silvennoinen, S. Ikonen, L. Soinne, M. Railo, and L. Valanne, “CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 97–103, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  11. R. A. Willinsky, S. M. Taylor, K. TerBrugge, R. I. Farb, G. Tomlinson, and W. Montanera, “Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature,” Radiology, vol. 227, no. 2, pp. 522–528, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  12. K. Kato, N. Tomura, S. Takahasi, I. Sakuma, and J. Watarai, “Ischemic lesions related to cerebral angiography: evaluation by diffusion weighted MR imaging,” Neuroradiology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 39–43, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  13. T. J. Kaufmann, J. Huston III, J. N. Mandrekar, C. D. Schleck, K. R. Thielen, and D. F. Kallmes, “Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19 826 consecutive patients,” Radiology, vol. 243, no. 3, pp. 812–819, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  14. J. J. Connors III, D. Sacks, A. J. Furlan et al., “Training, competency, and credentialing standards for diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography, carotid stenting, and cerebrovascular intervention: a joint statement from the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, the American Society of Neuroradiology, the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, the AANS/CNS Cerebrovascular Section, and the Society of Interventional Radiology,” Neurology, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 190–198, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  15. N. Takaya, C. Yuan, B. Chu et al., “Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with MRI—initial results,” Stroke, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 818–823, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  16. S. Prabhakaran, T. Rundek, R. Ramas et al., “Carotid plaque surface irregularity predicts ischemic stroke: the northern Manhattan study,” Stroke, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 2696–2701, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed