Review Article

The Importance of Psychological and Social Factors in Influencing the Uptake and Maintenance of Physical Activity after Stroke: A Structured Review of the Empirical Literature

Table 8

Details of the qualitative studies included in the review regarding method, participants, setting, summary of findings pertinent to psychological and social factors, and notes regarding theoretical models.

StudyMethodParticipantsSettingSummary of findingsNotes

Damush et al. [42]Qualitative:
focus groups
Age: mean = 59
Gender: M = 8, F = 5
Time since stroke = < 12 months
85% AA, 15% white
Country: USA
Service: Academic researchers, recruited from health service—local hospital
Barriers and facilitators to engage in PA.
Barriers:
Psychological: low mood, lack of motivation, and fear (pain, damage, and recurrence)
Facilitators: intrinsic motivation, PA as meaningful activity
Social: support from family, GP, physio, and other stroke survivors
No theoretical model used to underpin findings

Maher et al. [32]Mixed methods Qualitative: interview
(4 with stroke)
Age: mean for whole sample ( ) = 47.5 years
Gender: whole sample ( ) M=40%, F=60%
Time since stroke: not reported
Country: USA
Service: local government researchers—recruited from local authority run conditioning classes
Psychological: PA increased personal control, self-esteem, and feeling of autonomy
Social: increased self-esteem and independence lessens burden on carers and relationships. PA reduces social isolation, offers chance to meet others with disability—shared experience. Exercise in group acts as motivator to participate and adhere
No theoretical model used to underpin findings

Reed et al. [43]Qualitative: interviews Age: >60–73+
Gender: M = 5, F = 7
Time since stroke: 15–40 months,
mean 26 months
Country: UK
Service: university researchers—recruited from community stroke scheme
Psychological: loss of confidence, loss of role/purpose and doubts over competence limit engagement in PA
PA increased self-esteem, confidence, and gave sense of achievement—negated fear of falling
PA seen as substitute to physio and central to recovery
Social: ex-instructors important for support and recovery
Shared experience—PA offers learning from others, helped reestablish role in life and positive view of social self
Group PA fun, increased self-esteem, and encouraged progress
Developed own theoretical model to underpin findings

Barker and Brauer [44]Qualitative: focus groups and interviews Age: mean = 64
Gender: M = 12, F = 7
Time since stroke: 4.9 years
Country: Australia
Service: physiotherapy researchers—recruited from stroke support groups
Psychological: fear of pain and harm, frustration, previous failure, low mood, feelings of incompetence (physical/cognitive), negative attitude from others, lack of self-determination, lack of access all limit engagement in PABut, negative attitudes from others also act as a motivator, and PA seen as important for recovery and progress
Social: family often supportive but conversely also seen to encourage dependence
Therapist important for support and recovery—but need to encourage self-management.Group PA offers camaraderie, humour, and information exchange
Developed own theoretical model to underpin findings

Carin-Levy et al. [10]Qualitative: interviews Age: range 45–85
Gender: M = 8, F = 6
Time since stroke: not reported
Country: Scotland
Service: academic researchers, recruited from RCT
Psychological: vulnerability, anxiety, fear of falling, and concerns about communication act as barriers to PA
Once engaged in PA: increased confidence and reduced anxiety
PA offered feeling of empowerment—increased feelings of control
PA class either acted as motivator to exercise at home or conversely PA not maintained as had learned all there was to learn
Social: shared experience important—not feeling alone
PA in group important for social self, valued social interaction, and group exercise fun
Locus of control discussed in part explanation of results

Resnick et al. [45]Qualitative:
focus groups or telephone interviews
Age: over 45
Gender: M = 55, F = 45
Time since stroke: at least 6 months after stroke
Country: USA
Service: academic researchers, recruited from community, attended university medical centre
Psychological: intrinsic self-determination, sense of routine, monitoring of health, and feeling physically better all motivators to engage in PA
Offered increased sense of independence, offered something to do, helped keep active, and was enjoyable
Social: support from family, health professionals, ex instructors encouraged adherence
Not group based, but social interaction during transportation also encouraged adherence
Aspects of SCT self-efficacy used to underpin findings

Galvin et al. [33]Mixed methods Qualitative:
focus groups (10 physios)
stroke 40 male, 35 female
Age: not reported
Gender: not reported
Time since stroke: not reported
Country: Ireland
Service: physio researchers
Social: physios see family/friends play important role in rehab—continue work of physio
Eases transition from acute to community family members often motivated to help with rehab although also acknowledged that family can be too critical, too intense, or too emotional
No theoretical model used to underpin findings

Graham et al. [47]Qualitative: interviews
(5 stroke) Interviewed initially, 3 months, and 6 months
Age: not reported
Gender: M = 5, F = 0
Time since stroke: not reported
Country: Northern Ireland/Canada
Service: clinical psych researcher (NHS), recruited from community day centre
Psychological: focusing on disability and comparison with premorbid function and others = low self-confidence = barrier to PA. Conversely, PA seen as way to improve mood and offers encouragement to try other things and improve health
PA offers way to replace loss of identity/role—competent and athletic versus disabled
PA seen as way to push boundaries of society’s idea of disability
PA retained role of active person and continued engagement in competitive sport—change perceptions of disablement
Social: PA with others provides reference point for one’s own physical ability—either offers encouragement or conversely not conducive to progress—“no hopers” group PA fun and important opportunity for interaction and way to connect socially and regain degree of independence
Aspects of SCT self-efficacy used to underpin psychological factors Self-determination theory—increased autonomy and competence and social interaction increases intrinsic motivation to engage in PA

Wiles et al. [46]Qualitative interviews with stroke survivors ( ) and ex-professionals ( ) and focus groups and interviews physios ( )Age: mean = 18–78
Gender: M = 8, F = 1
Time since stroke: not specified 1993–2003
Country: UK
Service: community EoP
Psychological: stroke survivors motivated to engage to maintain health and fitness and as alternative to physio after rehab, but ultimately just want more physio
Physio see EoP as a bridge, ex professional see it as way to control own ex-regime
Social: physios role seen as very important—stroke survivor seeks presence of physio throughout EoP—want more interaction between physio and ex professional. Physio uncomfortable as could encroach on ex professional domain
Ex professional role—stroke survivors “left to own devices” and concerns reexpertise from stroke survivors, carers and physio. Ex professional confident in own ability but open to specialised training
Group exercise: limited interaction with other stroke survivors. Physio see opportunity for learning but acknowledge limited interaction based on own experience. Ex professional think EoP social
No theoretical model used to underpin results

Patterson and Ross-Edwards [48]Qualitative
interviews with stroke survivors ( )
Age: mean = 59.8
Gender: M = 6, F = 4
Time since stroke: not reported
Country: Australia
Service: community Stroke maintenance exercise class
Psychological: PA improved confidence and increased motivation, within group exercise class setting, but also in achieving goals within the community
Offered hope for recovery when see others with greater disability engaging and progressing in PA, which motivated to continue
Self-efficacy: exercise class offered practical, emotional, and social support. PA increased feelings of confidence, motivation, and associated improved self-efficacy, leading to minimisation of physical symptoms and perceived improved functioning in daily activities
Social: presence of health professionals important role in guiding exercises to do, but also in accessing ongoing support not accessible in community
Observing other stroke survivors achieving personal goals/making progress motivator to continue with PA and achieve own goals. Social support from other group members offered encouragement to attempt new exercises and challenge self-perceived limitations
Social benefits of exercising in a group setting important as they allow for exchange of experiences, support, and information with other stroke survivors. Created feeling of belonging and sense of community
Aspects of SCT self-efficacy