Conductive Education as a Method of Stroke Rehabilitation: A Single Blinded Randomised Controlled Feasibility Study
Table 2
Descriptive statistics for each outcome at baseline (T1) and reassessment (T2).
Outcome measure
Intervention
Control
T1 mean (SD)
T2 mean (SD)
T1 mean (SD)
T2 mean (SD)
Barthel Index
30
16.3 (3.3)
16.9 (3.0)
32
15.1 (4.9)
14.8 (5.0)
TUG (s)
28
34.9 (21.6)
38.0 (23.7)
27
31.5 (17.7)
47.4 (78.8)
10 m walk (s)
28
27.7 (20.5)
27.0 (20.9)
26
26.5 (16.3)
25.0 (18.8)
SIS strength
30
40.4 (24.6)
46.3 (25.3)
32
40.2 (24.7)
36.1 (20.6)
SIS memory
30
68.7 (24.5)
76.2 (22.7)
32
70.0 (22.7)
68.5 (28.4)
SIS emotion
30
63.8 (19.1)
67.4 (21.4)
31
60.5 (19.2)
61.9 (19.9)
SIS communication
30
81.6 (24.2)
83.0 (22.8)
32
63.7 (32.8)
65.0 (32.4)
SIS ADL
30
53.8 (17.7)
57.3 (20.3)
32
55.7 (23.3)
54.9 (25.1)
SIS mobility
30
57.8 (22.0)
66.8 (23.8)
32
58.5 (28.0)
58.0 (31.1)
SIS hand function
30
16.5 (23.8)
37.2 (34.6)
32
23.6 (34.0)
25.1 (30.7)
SIS participation
30
45.4 (28.9)
54.9 (27.7)
32
46.3 (27.5)
47.8 (24.2)
SIS % recovery
30
44.0 (19.5)
56.0 (21.0)
32
48.0 (18.6)
47.9 (20.0)
HADS anxiety
29
7.2 (4.4)
6.1 (3.7)
31
8.0 (5.8)
7.6 (5.5)
HADS depression
29
7.9 (3.9)
5.6 (3.8)
31
7.6 (4.6)
7.1 (4.8)
Note: Barthel Index scores out of 20; TUG: Timed Up and Go test; SIS: Stroke Impact Scale, scores out of 100; HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; each component scores out of 21.
